Scroll through pictures above to see full list of 0 and 1 rated restaurants across the Wycombe, South Bucks and Chiltern districts.

As happy couples across south Buckinghamshire prepare to celebrate Valentine’s Day in style on Tuesday, the Bucks Free Press reveals the county’s least hygienic places to eat.

From a cosy night in with a takeaway, to pub grub or a posh meal out, most people will have plans - but are there places which should be avoided?

We have compiled a list of the 57 restaurants, pubs, takeaways, cafes and sandwich shops which have been given a hygiene rating of 0 or 1 in the Wycombe, South Bucks and Chiltern districts, according to the Food Standards Agency.

Take a look through our list of restaurants above – you might even spot your favourite place to eat or somewhere you were tempted to try.

Bucks Free Press:

FHRS inspectors investigate how hygienically food is handled, the condition of the structure of the buildings and how the business manages and records what it does to make sure food is safe.

Businesses with a low rating are inspected more frequently than those who have a higher score and training and advice is offered by the environmental health team to help businesses to improve their standards of food safety.

In addition, safeguards are in place which not only allow businesses to appeal their rating, but also to request a re-inspection once improvements have been made.

Cllr Jean Teesdale, WDC cabinet member for environment, said: "Over 824 food establishments [in the Wycombe district] currently have a rating of 3 or better.

"Takeaways, pubs, cafes and restaurants with ratings of 0 or 1 actually only make up 9.9 per cent of all rated businesses in the district, so finding a safe place to eat shouldn’t be a problem.

"Food hygiene ratings help you to make an informed decision about where you might want to eat out.

“Our environmental health team work very hard to help drive up food safety standards in the district – and when businesses just don’t want to improve, we’ll take action against them to protect public safety."