News RSS Feed


Text banner 2

Waste could be burnt in future

1:00pm Thursday 28th December 2006

comment Comments (7)   Have your say »

By Paul Leat »

TONNES of household waste could be incinerated instead of being placed in landfill sites in future as a way of avoiding costly Government fines.

New legislation means that councils will be limited as to how much waste they can use for landfill without incurring severe penalties, and Buckinghamshire County Council has been looking at alternative ways of getting rid of our excess rubbish.

"My committee has had to become very knowledgeable about this highly complex technical subject in order to make sure we help get a solution for our council taxpayers which is value for money, environmentally sound, and delivers our objectives."

Cllr Richard Pushman

Last week, the overview and scrutiny committee for environmental services recommended an incineration process called Energy from Waste should be adopted.

The method, which was deemed the most cost- effective and environmentally friendly, was chosen ahead of an alternative process called Mechanical Biological Treatment with Anaerobic Digestion - which reduces the waste to a solid which can then be used to generate power.

The recommendation will now be put before the council cabinet when they meet in January.

Buckinghamshire homeowners currently produce 275,000 tonnes of rubbish each year. Around 40 per cent of this is currently recycled, with the aim to increase this figure to 45 per cent by 2010.

Cllr Richard Pushman, chairman of the committee, said: "My committee has had to become very knowledgeable about this highly complex technical subject in order to make sure we help get a solution for our council taxpayers which is value for money, environmentally sound, and delivers our objectives.

"They have made a point of visiting technologies to understand how they work, including the rigorous checks that are in place to ensure technologies are safe and environmentally-friendly.

"The hard work they have put in meant that, backed up with sound financial and technical advice from officers and consultants, they were able to reach a unanimous decision."


Your Say YourBucks

P Morris, says...
7:48am Fri 29 Dec 06

In one way, the decision to go with an incinerator was the easy one.

The BIG question to be answered is where will it be located?

NIMBYs of Bucks will be fighting hard to ensure it is not built near them - rubbish lorries going in and out at all times, fumes (or the fear of fumes) from the incinerator, no matter how high tech, etc. will ensure this project is delayed for years!

anon, says...
9:06am Fri 29 Dec 06

perhaps Cllr Peter Morris - it should be built in the Disraeli ward of Wycombe? Along with the Bucks voting NIMBY's that voted for your election?

Laugh-a-lot, says...
1:36am Sat 30 Dec 06

Anon appears to know a lot about our local councillors, last week it was the Mayor he was taking to task, has Anon an axe to grid because of past council action, is Anon on the council?
Interesting.

Ivor Bigun, says...
2:38am Sat 30 Dec 06

The residents of Wycombe are being asked to sort their refuse for recycling but their refuse collections are being reduced, ie. one “green” collection one week and a “non green” collection the next week, this means that we are ending up with having each bin emptied only every two weeks, which is just not good enough.

With the ever increasing number of new houses being built locally it is no surprise that more refuse is being generated. To stop the extra waste being created should we not stop building all these new homes in the area? More homes = more people = more rubbish.

I have been living in Wycombe for many years and quite honestly I don’t see why my refuse collection should be affected in favour of people who have only just moved into the town.

If incineration is so good why can’t we just incinerate the lot and go back to having our “non green” bins emptied every week?

Ivor, says...
8:12pm Sat 30 Dec 06

I wonder if Wycombe residents felt their space was being invaded when Ivor Bigun arrived in the borough all those years ago.

Ivor Bigun, says...
9:09pm Sat 30 Dec 06

I was only trying to point out the obvious, this being that the more people there are in Wycombe (with the current amount of waste they generate) the more waste that will be created. There is only a limited amount of waste that can be disposed of, in Wycombe we are now approaching the limit and, as a result, are having to suffer reduced collections perhaps Ivor (at 8.12pm) you are pleased at having rubbish hanging around for two weeks at your house with maggots in your bin?

We should not be worrying about the disposal of the waste, it should not be created in the first place. Why not tackle the over packaging of so many products that are sold in our shops?

By tackling the disposal we are missing the point, which is stop creating the mess in the first place. It’s not about waste disposal, it’s all about waste creation. Wycombe council can not solve the waste creation problem, only central government can do this with a national policy to the supermarkets, etc....

Oh, by the way, my family has been living in the area for many hundreds of years and have been involved (and still are) with the development and prosperity of the town during that time, we helped to make Wycombe what it is.... (Was that a good thing to say????)

Steve, Totteridge Hill says...
3:13pm Mon 25 Jun 07

When are we going to get our incinerator?

Your sayYourBucks

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Bucks Free Press account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?
Up in smoke? Waste could be burnt in future Up in smoke? Waste could be burnt in future

Sponsored Links


Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »