News RSS Feed


Text banner 2

Home extension may be demolished

6:14pm Wednesday 2nd July 2008

comment Comments (10)   Have your say »

By Hannah Williams »

A HOMEOWNER may be forced to demolish an extension after his retrospective planning permission was refused tonight.

South Bucks District Council's planning committee voted unanimously to turn down an application for a first floor side extension by on a house in Woodhill Avenue, Gerrards Cross.

More than 30 nearby homeowners wrote letters of objection to the plans, some claiming the extension in the residential area of exceptional character' was intrusive and overbearing'.

Planning officers recommended permission be granted prior to the councillors' decision.

A previous application was turned down in February last year.

Councillor Deirdre Holloway said: "This is extraordinary because as far as I can see someone has had an application turned down.

"It has been turned down and they have gone ahead and built it anyway."

She added: "I think it's really bad for all the people who put in planning permission and wait to get it."

Councillors heard the owner may choose to appeal the decision or be asked to take it down.


Your Say YourBucks

tony, says...
6:32pm Wed 2 Jul 08

course it should be demolished!
Councillor Deirdre Holloway said: "This is extraordinary because as far as I can see someone has had an application turned down.

"It has been turned down and they have gone ahead and built it anyway."

She added: "I think it's really bad for all the people who put in planning permission and wait to get it."


AND they should be made to pay all the costs involved with the planning committee

SBJones, Wycombe says...
6:39pm Wed 2 Jul 08

the council should go and knock it down immediately no appeal should be allowed

erm, ermsville says...
7:09pm Wed 2 Jul 08

hahahahahaha

hahahahahaha

hahahahahaha

not much else to say is there

Feist the Heist, High Wycombe says...
8:32pm Wed 2 Jul 08

This really annoys me. We are cuurently building an extension and have had to go through all the proper channels, as costly and time consuming as that may be. Why do these people think that they are above the rules that everyone else has to follow. Knock it down and make them pay, nothing else is acceptable in this case!

Catflap, work says...
10:15am Thu 3 Jul 08

name and sham please

acjy1985, high wycombe says...
12:33pm Thu 3 Jul 08

I agree with Tony. It should be pulled down and all cost retrieved. Surely it is against the law to build a one storey building without planning permission.

R of Wycombe, High Wycombe says...
4:27pm Thu 3 Jul 08

can i drive the bulldozer

rob, wycombe says...
5:24pm Thu 3 Jul 08

council only doing this because they are not screwing cash out of it

shylock, Terriers says...
11:34pm Tue 8 Jul 08

Catflap wrote:
name and sham please
That'll be name and shame then? Bet the BFP don't follow it up.

Johncp, ayrshire says...
9:16pm Thu 7 Aug 08

Here in Scotland,is a similar situation - a entension at the rear of a semi-detatched. Solo, though, how could I make "demolish" happen here?

Your sayYourBucks

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Bucks Free Press account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Sponsored Links


Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »