20 food outlets in Wycombe score 'zero' on hygiene rating

File photo File photo

TWENTY food outlets in Wycombe need to make ‘urgent’ improvements to meet food hygiene standards - according to a ratings system used by our councils.

This figure includes takeaway outlets, restaurants, shops and pubs which have scored ‘zero’ of out five in the Food Hygiene Rating Scheme.

Firms are given a green sticker to display their rating in the window, but are not required to do this.

However, you can easily check the rating of almost every food business in the county on the Food Standards Agency website. The website includes the option to sort the results by rating - CLICK HERE

The scheme has now been running for several months in Wycombe, with 900 premises inspected to help people choose where to eat out or shop for food.

Currently 84 food outlets are rated as one out of five – indicating ‘major improvements’ are necessary. However, nearly 300 premises in Wycombe have scored a ‘very good’ five out of five.

Inspectors look at how hygienically the food is handled, as well as the condition of the buildings and how the firm records what it does to make sure food is safe.

Wycombe District Council, which operates the scheme, said some of the zero ratings reflect “a lack of a formal documented food safety management system”, while other firms may have made improvements since the last inspection.

Related links

Spokesman Nick Sykes added: “Where there are serious contraventions that pose an imminent risk to public health, we do take action to protect this (which can include closing the premises down).

“In all other cases we take the appropriate enforcement action to secure compliance in line with our protocol.”

Cllr Audrey Jones, the council’s cabinet member for environment said it is “vitally important that food is prepared and cooked in the correct manner”.

But asked if the council advises people to avoid firms with a zero rating, Mr Sykes said: “This is not our role, the scheme provides information to the public to allow them to make informed decisions.”

The South Bucks district has about 480 food outlets - just over half the total in Wycombe - but only 11 of those have been given a rating of zero or one [with three rated zero]. Chiltern has about 600 outlets, with 45 given the bottom two ratings [with two rated zero].

For the ratings in South Bucks click HERE and for Chiltern click HERE

For more information on the ratings system click HERE

Comments(20)

Fit2drop says...
12:36pm Wed 14 Nov 12

name them

motco says...
12:56pm Wed 14 Nov 12

Look 'em up!

Ivor'sbestfriend says...
12:58pm Wed 14 Nov 12

99p Stores
37 - 38 High Street High Wycombe Buckinghamshire

Barnes Food & Wine
52-54 Castle Street High Wycombe Bucks

Bella Vita
1 - 3 Bell Street Princes Risborough Buckinghamshire

Black Lion Public House
The Black Lion Woodlands Drive Naphill High Wycombe

Chicken Cottage
5 Oxford Street High Wycombe Bucks

Denis's Kebab
High Street Traders High Street High Wycombe Buckinghamshire

Farmhouse Pizza
258 Desborough Road High Wycombe Buckinghamshire

Giant Pizza Company
6 Cross Court Plomer Green Avenue Downley High Wycombe

Guls Grill & Curry
256 Desborough Road High Wycombe Bucks

Kebabish Original
8 Oxford Street High Wycombe Buckinghamshire

Kings Ride Supermarket
Kings Ride Supermarket 28-30 Kings Ride Tylers Green High Wycombe

Naphill Mini Market
19 Main Road Naphill Buckinghamshire

Nasars
8 Corporation Street High Wycombe Buckinghamshire

Noshahi Halal Meat & Food Store
118 - 120 Desborough Road High Wycombe Buckinghamshire

Shammy's Fry
1 Dashwood Avenue High Wycombe Bucks

Star Of India
Holmer Green Road Hazlemere Buckinghamshire

Starlight Stores
8 High Street Downley Buckinghamshire

Thai Masala Restaurant
The Heart In Hand Cores End Road Bourne End Buckinghamshire

The Pad
Wycombe Air Park Booker High Wycombe Bucks

The Pheasant PH
The Pheasant PH 99 London Road High Wycombe Bucks

KrisChaplin says...
1:20pm Wed 14 Nov 12

Its very well looking at this list and thinking to best avoid, just make sure you have all the facts. I looked up my local chinese takeaway, and was concerned at the score, so I requested a copy of the inpspectors report under the freedom of information act. There was nothing wrong with hygene or standards, "only" book keeping of some logs. Once this was implemented, they jumped from 1/5 to 4/5.

Darren Hayday says...
1:56pm Wed 14 Nov 12

Yuck - there are one or two places that I shall stay clear off from now on...

Me, just me says...
2:28pm Wed 14 Nov 12

'The food safety officer inspecting a business checks how well the business is meeting the law by looking at:

how hygienically the food is handled – how it is prepared, cooked, re-heated, cooled and stored
the condition of the structure of the buildings – the cleanliness, layout, lighting, ventilation and other facilities
how the business manages and records what it does to make sure food is safe
At the end of the inspection, the business is given one of the six ratings. The top rating of ‘5’ means that the business was found to have ‘very good’ hygiene standards. Any business should be able to reach this top rating.

The food safety officer will explain to the person who owns or manages the business what improvements are needed and how they can achieve the top rating of '5'. The local authority will check that these improvements are made.

The Food Hygiene Rating Scheme has been designed to make sure that the ratings given to businesses are fair.'


Im a little worried, i eat at several of the places that get a '0', yuk

gungun says...
2:34pm Wed 14 Nov 12

Like anyone ever thought (or cared after a night on the beer) what the hygiene of your Doner Kebab or fried chicken supplier was.

Interesting that some pubs were mentioned and that book keeping can mark you down

Gerry47 says...
3:04pm Wed 14 Nov 12

Why was Ann Summers listed as excempt ? Aren't chocolate willies subject to food hygiene standards ?

Ivor'sbestfriend says...
3:12pm Wed 14 Nov 12

Gerry47 wrote:
Why was Ann Summers listed as excempt ? Aren't chocolate willies subject to food hygiene standards ?
Ask Ivor about that.

Scarletto says...
4:38pm Wed 14 Nov 12

Makes alarming reading if you click on some of the well known premises plus some of the little village stores.
We should all hope they've got the message and prohibition/closure orders are served if they persist when re-inspected.

readerabc says...
5:00pm Wed 14 Nov 12

book-keeping!!! - they mean record keeping - food safety logs, fridge temperatures, cleaning records etc

Lividov says...
5:46pm Wed 14 Nov 12

Brilliant! Interesting that not one curry house gets more than a 3. It's no better here in Marlow with Maliks only achieving 2 stars. Poor show all round. I hopes it make them buck their ideas up!

Voyeur says...
6:40pm Wed 14 Nov 12

This story makes me sick!

300Aylesbury says...
7:24pm Wed 14 Nov 12

The Black Lion Naphill, zero! And its just been refurbished. If you value your health look at the list and stay away.

RESPECTOTHERS says...
10:27pm Wed 14 Nov 12

Thank you Ivor

Me, just me says...
12:38pm Thu 15 Nov 12

300Aylesbury wrote:
The Black Lion Naphill, zero! And its just been refurbished. If you value your health look at the list and stay away.
I had food poisoning from there once, but i think it has changed hands since then

J B Blackett says...
11:45pm Thu 15 Nov 12

Some of these food businesses / franchises (especially those using poisonous transfats in Wycombe town , Marlow etc and surrounding areas) exude such a foul revolting stomach-churning toxic stench that it's a wonder they actually managed to score even a zero.
.
Those outlets surely should get negative scores - reflecting the immediate danger people reckless enough to let any of that smelly evil slimy oozy stuff near any of their bodily orifices.
.
You can tell which ones they are by just observing them (from the outside) .. You don't need a degree in hygiene to work out or spot which are the unhygienic and dangerous ones.

Lividov says...
12:24pm Fri 16 Nov 12

Why a negative score - isn't 0 stars bad enough?

wicker says...
2:07pm Fri 16 Nov 12

im a lil shocked at john hambden school score being sooooo low think they need to re access their catering manager as they are also responsible for the health and welfare of our children whilst in their care....we dont expect it to be put at risk ,put it this way a mobile trader scored higher than the school yes one of those horrible food vans well done them! sort your selves out

J B Blackett says...
1:37pm Sun 18 Nov 12

Lividov wrote:
Why a negative score - isn't 0 stars bad enough?
No - zero stars is not adequate. Some of these places are an actual threat and instant danger to anybody foolish or innocent enough to frequent these places.
.
Currently with a zero rating these awful oulets can still carry on trading and selling their toxic products to the general public. A negative score would mean they had to immediately cease trading until they put things right and were subsequently re-evaluated
.
Currently that does not happen and the public is put at unnecessary risk of food poisoning or worse.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree