147 county council jobs could go by June (From Bucks Free Press)
Send your news, photos and videos by texting bucksfreepress to 80360 or email
147 county council jobs could go by June
12:33pm Tuesday 15th January 2013 in News By James Nadal
Buckinghamshire County Council's HQ in Aylesbury
UP to 147 jobs at Buckinghamshire County Council could go between now and June.
The authority, responsible for roads and schools among other services, announced its budget plans last week and has told the BFP these posts may be lost in the first five months of 2013.
Redundancies are not necessarily going to occur in all of the 147 positions, officials said.
But the move is part of ongoing cut backs as funding from central Government continues to be reduced.
The council said it total savings over the last three years now amount to £68 million.
The numbers of staff at the council have already dropped from over 4,150 in September 2009 to 3,231 in September 2012, its latest figures show. These do not include teachers or school staff.
Council leader Martin Tett last week said more “back office savings” were being made for the next financial year, starting in April and officials have now said these are predominantly from services such as HR, Finance, ICT, Business Support, Property and Legal Services.
Aidan Shutter, council spokesman, said: “We send regular reports to the Dept. for Business Innovation and Skills on projected redundancies across the organisation.
“At present we have declared that up to 147 posts may be lost between January and June 2013.
“Not all these will result in redundancies as some are vacant and some covered by temporary staff. “We have a strong track record of managing workforce reductions so that they have the minimum impact on employees.
“The county council is constantly striving to find more efficient ways of delivering services or automating processes.”
He added: “In addition to finding more effective ways of delivering back office services, the county council is also delivering more income which is helping to close the budget gaps and protect vital front line services.”
Comments are closed on this article.
Comments (15)
12:37pm Tue 15 Jan 13
miccles says...
How about some of the top brass go???
4:41pm Tue 15 Jan 13
Bill Taxpayer says...
And they try to tell us they are a "cash-strapped council!!"
6:08pm Tue 15 Jan 13
DonRockell says...
6:34pm Tue 15 Jan 13
allrightnow2 says...
8:49pm Tue 15 Jan 13
demoness the second says...
And the government encouraging the belief that all people on unemployment benefit are workshy and wanting to cut it more.
Less jobs,more unemployment,less money being spent so even more jobs being loss.
This is truly awful... the rich get richer, the poor get poorer and the middle get squeezed.
8:49pm Tue 15 Jan 13
demoness the second says...
And the government encouraging the belief that all people on unemployment benefit are workshy and wanting to cut it more.
Less jobs,more unemployment,less money being spent so even more jobs being loss.
This is truly awful... the rich get richer, the poor get poorer and the middle get squeezed.
9:13pm Tue 15 Jan 13
gotanybiscuits? says...
.
That kind of cash could sort a few potholes.
9:59pm Tue 15 Jan 13
oharepd111 says...
10:32pm Tue 15 Jan 13
Aquator says...
You and I on a daily basis are expected to forgive one another for minor trespasses. What has happened that enables the banking system, both national and global to be empowered to utterly disregard the precautionary principle that is the foundation of the legislature
People are being driven into a desperate condition, is the intention to kill by means of the four horses? I think it is and so do increasing numbers of others.
10:59pm Tue 15 Jan 13
Mr Totterdge Hill says...
10:45am Wed 16 Jan 13
Bill Taxpayer says...
3:22pm Thu 17 Jan 13
washondo says...
~
They told us "if they paid peanuts, they got monkeys"; and.........?
~
Cheetah died very rich apparently.
10:45am Fri 18 Jan 13
washondo says...
7:48am Sun 20 Jan 13
washondo says...
~
Will the reduction of 147 staff constitute a reduction of responsibility and a proportional reduction in pay for the CEO? Why not?
~
Instead he will probably get a pay rise for efficiency.
~
How does that work??
7:55am Mon 21 Jan 13
williamjames says...
Some time ago WDC reduced the number of directors by 50% and the number of Heads of Service by 45% will little if any reduction of the staff deliverig and supporting services to the public.
It is now time for such a reorganisation in BCC to reduce the management overhead and bring service delivery into the 21st Century.