Vascular surgery heading for 'disaster', Wycombe MP tells the Commons (From Bucks Free Press)
Send your news, photos and videos by texting bucksfreepress to 80360 or email
Vascular surgery heading for 'disaster', Steve Baker tells the Commons
1:00pm Tuesday 15th January 2013 in News By Lawrence Dunhill
Image from BBC iPlayer
A “BLATANT rejection” of clinical evidence means vascular services for Bucks patients are heading for disaster, the House of Commons heard last night.
MP Steve Baker secured a late Parliamentary debate on the plight of Wycombe Hospital yesterday – raising further concerns around the loss of complex vascular surgery to Oxford.
The NHS shake-up, recommended by the South Central Cardiovascular Network, is aimed at creating a specialist centre at the John Radcliffe Hospital [JRH], benefitting from increased consultant cover and expertise.
But the changes were questioned several times last year by the Bucks Free Press and Mr Baker, who yesterday produced “clear clinical evidence” that Wycombe outperforms the JRH.
Diseases of the arteries and veins used to be treated by traditional surgery only, but problems can now be dealt with by using a more modern, less invasive procedure called endovascular surgery.
This involves using imaging techniques to see inside the body while a narrow tube [catheter] is guided to the site of the problem through the blood vessels, which generally means less risk, less pain and shorter recovery times for patients.
Last year an independent review of the changes found vascular services at Oxford are “ten to fifteen years behind the best”, while surrounding hospitals "probably provide a better endovascular service" (see related links).
And yesterday, Mr Baker said he had obtained data which shows Wycombe achieved eight vascular interventions for each amputation during the first half of 2012/13, compared with just 4.5 at the JRH.
He said “this shows a considerably greater degree of success in maintaining people’s limbs in very difficult circumstances”.
And the Conservative MP for Wycombe added: “Vascular services in Wycombe are not some ditch and gatepost operation to be salvaged by the great Oxford University hospitals, as Wycombe outperforms them with a smaller team. In this regard, it is the John Radcliffe that needs saving...
“Vascular services in the Thames Valley appear to be not so much sleepwalking into disaster as positively driving towards it.”
Despite detailing a series of problems, including the resignation of a senior surgeon, last year’s independent review said the changes should still go ahead on the basis that vascular services should be co-located alongside Oxford’s major trauma unit.
But Mr Baker says this was “a blatant rejection of the principle that is constantly used to justify centralising services away: clear clinical evidence”.
Certain vascular procedures, such as Carotid Surgery, are set to remain in Wycombe until 2014 at least, though the review said this is unsustainable in the long term (see related links).
And the likely loss of carotid surgery from Wycombe Hospital has raised concern that this could in turn threaten its critical care, coronary and hyper-acute stroke units.
In response to Mr Baker, health minister Dr Daniel Poulter noted the importance of vascular services to Wycombe, which has large Asian population, among whom there is a higher rate of cardiovascular disease.
However, he said changes to front-line health services are a matter for the local NHS, and evidence on a wider scale indicates that centralisation of vascular services achieves better outcomes.
He added: “Generally speaking, all surgeons need to do a minimum number of procedures in order to maintain regular competency, and to maintain continually high and good outcomes for patients...
“That is the reason for the service reconfiguration. The argument can be made, as my hon. Friend has done, that Wycombe should continue to provide those services, but we know that the national data and best evidence point to the fact that the services are best provided at specialist centres.”
See related links for a video of the debate and Friday's Bucks Free Press for a full report.
Comments are closed on this article.
Comments (16)
1:05pm Tue 15 Jan 13
Welwyn Dowd says...
2:00pm Tue 15 Jan 13
yog says...
6:01pm Tue 15 Jan 13
ChilternsBlue says...
7:22pm Tue 15 Jan 13
Darren Hayday says...
8:44pm Tue 15 Jan 13
Wycombe Elector says...
What we need is constructive comment, not people simply trying to create a platform that doesn't exist for their own political ambitions.
9:52pm Tue 15 Jan 13
J B Blackett says...
.
I know you can't win them all - but most MPs seem like either dead losses , dead weight or deadheads nowadays.
.
You know that's the truth (allegedly).
10:35pm Tue 15 Jan 13
Zia Ahmed says...
11:14pm Tue 15 Jan 13
J B Blackett says...
.
We don't think that's addressing the problem at all.
.
But you carry on believing it , if you want to. Good Luck.
9:22am Wed 16 Jan 13
Edgar Brooks says...
10:06am Wed 16 Jan 13
Darren Hayday says...
I personally think that Paul Goodman did a better job than Steve Baker in regards to trying to save Wycombe.
Here is a constructive comment just for you:
"Give us back our lost A&E and maternity services to Wycombe Hospital."
If Steve Baker really cared, then he could threaten to leave the Conservative Party over this.
But he will not as it’s his ticket and he will not bite the hand that feeds him.
10:53am Wed 16 Jan 13
Wycombe Elector says...
4:35pm Wed 16 Jan 13
Darren Hayday says...
But his party is in power at the moment and Jeremy Hunt and David Cameron should get their heads together and sort this NHS mess out (including Wycombe Hosptial)
But they don’t - they give out flowery Press Releases every so often and debate issues that most of us don’t care about.
It's the way that the system has been set up and you nor I (or Steve) can do anything about it.
That is why the majority of the public have little or no trust in politicians.
But as long as we have the Status Quo - then the system stays in place and one political party takes over from the last - which has been happening since ye olden days of the Whig and Tory parties...
5:43pm Wed 16 Jan 13
norma stitz says...
Mind you, if the Tories are still in power I doubt we will have a national health service either.
Lets face it their current reforms are designed to privatise health anyway.
9:12pm Wed 16 Jan 13
stevet123 says...
6:01pm Thu 17 Jan 13
J B Blackett says...
.
Words are cheap . And so far this chap has not taken any affirmative , positive or proactive action action about anything in Wycombe.
.
He is a fence-sitter and waits for the cat to jump one way or the other - as has been proven over several local issues in recent times.
.
Paul Goodman, whilst not an overwhelmingly great representative, did on several occasions go out his way to bring local issues to some effect to the attention of the arrogant powers that be .
9:39am Fri 18 Jan 13
Aquator says...
These events were also predicted and likewise it was known that the existing party political system would fail to provide remedy and once you know why so many bad things are happening, then and only then can we begin to rebuild.
What is the reason for these changes? A lack of money by chance?
UKColumn.org - Bradbury Pound.
We do not need party politics, nor should we allow everything to be put into the hands of private corporations.
Party politics as can be seen above simply causes division. These things we should not be dealing with on an adversarial basis.
We must return to the issuance of our own money. It is the tolerance of usury and the power of the central banking system that is proven to be behind these miseries.
Slavery and hardship are destined to manifest more and more, whilst the present system defiles the natural law and our people.