Residents group secures Judicial Review of council's decision (From Bucks Free Press)
Send your news, photos and videos by texting bucksfreepress to 80360 or email
Residents group secures Judicial Review of council's decision
11:33am Monday 28th January 2013 in News By Simon Farr
Residents group secures Judicial Review of council's ruling
A COUNCIL will have to defend its decision to leave two key sites out of the Daws Hill Neighbourhood Forum’s area before a High Court judge.
The forum (DHNF) has secured a Judicial Review of Wycombe District Council’s decision to omit Handy Cross and the old RAF Daws Hill base from its neighborhood area. Huge developments are planned for both.
The two parties will present their case to a judge at the Royal Courts of Justice next month in what is believed to be a groundbreaking case.
DHNF chairman Stewart Armstrong said: “We are very pleased.
“The action by WDC on the neighbourhood area limited DHNF’s ability to influence development on those sites in contradiction of the much vaunted Localism Act, which is supposed to give the residents the power to shape the future of where they live.
“These sites are clearly within any sensible definition of a neighbourhood area and therefore we believe that we have a good case – which we believe is a first of its kind and we know we’re being watched around the country.”
He added DHNF had snapped up a legal team on a no-win, no-fee basis, with a protective cost order of £10,000. Mr Armstrong understands the council’s PCO is £30,000 in a winner-takes-all scenario.
WDC’s ruling over the neighbourhood area was ‘called-in’ by the authority’s Improvement and Review Commission but it was upheld by Cabinet, leaving DHNF with “no option” to call in the barristers.
But WDC’s head of Planning and Sustainability Jerry Unsworth said the authority stands by its original decision to leave out the two sites.
He said: “WDC gave its reasons to the forum and these referred to the strategic nature of the sites and the wide ‘communities of interest’.
“[Other reasons were] the difficult timing with plans and applications for the sites well advanced and the other opportunities for the community to input to the planning of these strategic sites…
“Both the sites are major developments which will affect, benefit and be used by people across our district and beyond.
“As such both the council and the Daws Hill developer have clearly stated their commitment to work closely with local people and organisations, and the council has made strenuous efforts to ensure they are part of the process of shaping the future of both these areas.
“If a Neighbourhood Plan were to formally proceed it would take a considerable time to pass through the various consultation, examination, referendum and adoption stages - probably taking more than a year. This would be after the timing for council’s decisions.”
Neighbourhood Forums were born out of the Localism Act, which introduced new planning tools for community groups.
The idea is to give residents the chance to shape their communities.
The Judicial Review will take place on February 21 and 22.
Comments are closed on this article.
Comments (3)
2:09pm Mon 28 Jan 13
KTinBucks says...
Trawl the Planning media and you will find many examples of Councils being complemented on their co-operation with residents on Neighbourhood Fora. Not so WDC.
Despite the fine words, they unilaterally decided to reduce the geographical reach of the Neighbourhood Area, they did not consult with the DHNF but presented their decision as a fait accompli, then pointed to legal advice as their tail-covering justification.
It seems obvious from their actions that they will resist the aims and intentions of the new legislation at any cost, even to the extent of sinking citizens’ tax monies in avoidable legal battles.
What price harmony?
11:41pm Mon 28 Jan 13
yog says...
9:20am Wed 30 Jan 13
Power2thePeople says...
Yet Eric Pickles, Secretary of State, refused to make a decision on the Handy Cross Sports Area citing (among other reasons) the proposed development does not effect people in a wider area.
Come on guys. Make your mind up. Or do we need a High Court Judge to decide? Seems we do.
P2P