Ambulance crews faced with 'longest hospital delays on record'

Ambulance crews faced with 'longest delays on record' Ambulance crews faced with 'longest delays on record'

AMBULANCE crews are being forced to queue longer than ever before they are able to pass patients on to medics in A&E.

South Central Ambulance Service paramedics spent an extra 14 hours on the tarmac at Wycombe Hospital and 128 additional hours waiting at Stoke Mandeville Hospital in December.

Delays at Wexham Park Hospital were up to 256 hours, while SCAS crew queued for 170 hours at the John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford.

In total, SCAS ambulances spent 1,984 excessive hours waiting around at the hospitals it serves, which equates to 2.7 ambulances effectively being out of action for the entire month, the information obtained by the BBC under the Freedom of Information Act revealed.

Director of patient care at SACS Fizz Thompson told the Free Press: “Patient safety is our top priority. SCAS would never leave a patient without an appropriate clinical handover to hospital clinical staff.

“When we have ambulances queuing at hospital it means that our crews have to look after patients on trolleys in the Emergency Department (ED).

“On occasion, ambulances can wait for a considerable time at hospital because of capacity problems within that ED and when they do, they are unavailable to respond to 999 medical emergencies.

“SCAS has, in partnership with hospitals across the South Central Region, developed contingency plans to ease patient flows and to free up ambulance resources delayed at hospital.

“Multi cot vehicles and marquees may be used in exceptional circumstances, for example if there is no physical room left for us to queue inside the Emergency Department, or if the trust is faced with a major incident.

“We may have to do this in order to release ambulances to respond to 999 emergencies in the community.”

The deputy NHS chief executive David Flory wrote an open letter to health chiefs in June over concerns of ambulance to A&E handovers.

In the letter, he said he “expected” patients to be transferred from the care of ambulance crews to hospital staff within 15 minutes.

The letter states: “There is increasing concern about the ongoing problem of patient handovers from ambulances to hospitals.

“While this is not a widespread problem, the unacceptably long handover times in a number of places is sufficient to warrant our focused attention.

“There should be no doubt the delays have an adverse impact on patients’ experience of the service and may increase risk to patient safety.

“We must therefore take a “zero tolerance” approach to handover delays, and recognise that there is a joint responsibility on ambulance and hospital trusts to ensure such delays are minimised.”

Mr Flory went on to state he had encouraged appropriate action to be taken against organisations where patient transfers were problematic.

Comments(14)

s6blr says...
11:23am Fri 1 Feb 13

Gosh I feel so much better knowing that our A&E's ready for the consolidation to disimprove efficiency…

Utter validation that the regime in No. 10 will destroy what remains of the NHS.

Catflap says...
11:26am Fri 1 Feb 13

Surprised! i don't think so.

wearywasp says...
11:30am Fri 1 Feb 13

Got to fund our wealthy friends top rate tax cut somehow.

Honey33 says...
12:21pm Fri 1 Feb 13

The letter states: “There is increasing concern about the ongoing problem of patient handovers from ambulances to hospitals.
“While this is not a widespread problem, the unacceptably long handover times in a number of places is sufficient to warrant our focused attention.
“There should be no doubt the delays have an adverse impact on patients’ experience of the service and may increase risk to patient safety.
“We must therefore take a “zero tolerance” approach to handover delays, and recognise that there is a joint responsibility on ambulance and hospital trusts to ensure such delays are minimised.”
There is no need for NHS fat cats to hide their faces in shame. I will give you the solution and the zero tolerence; give us our A&E services back to High Wycombe, problem solved.

miccles says...
12:43pm Fri 1 Feb 13

Never used to be like this when A&E was at Wycombe aswell.

washondo says...
12:57pm Fri 1 Feb 13

Examples should be made.
~
Such Inefficiency cannot be tolerated. Those incompetents responsible MUST be sacked, and be seen to be sacked.

gpn01 says...
1:00pm Fri 1 Feb 13

This is a problem with "metric management" whereby an organisation focusses solely on delivering against the numbers instead of providing the service that was hoped for. In this case the backlog is probably because someone has instigated some bed allocation metric which means that beds aren't free'd up quickly enough for use.

The risk is that "ambulance queue time" will become a metric and some bright spark will soon realise that there's a really easy way to decrease queueing time ....get the ambulance to drive more slowly. The other option is to increase the ambulance journey time. Something that they've succeeded in already by closing a local A&E, thereby forcing ambulances to take patients to A&E's further away. At some point the number of patients dying in transit will increase and eventually the pen pushers will take notice. Sadly it'll need lives to be lost before something is done.

miccles says...
1:10pm Fri 1 Feb 13

gpn01 wrote:
This is a problem with "metric management" whereby an organisation focusses solely on delivering against the numbers instead of providing the service that was hoped for. In this case the backlog is probably because someone has instigated some bed allocation metric which means that beds aren't free'd up quickly enough for use.

The risk is that "ambulance queue time" will become a metric and some bright spark will soon realise that there's a really easy way to decrease queueing time ....get the ambulance to drive more slowly. The other option is to increase the ambulance journey time. Something that they've succeeded in already by closing a local A&E, thereby forcing ambulances to take patients to A&E's further away. At some point the number of patients dying in transit will increase and eventually the pen pushers will take notice. Sadly it'll need lives to be lost before something is done.
At some point the number of patients dying in transit will increase and eventually the pen pushers will take notice. Sadly it'll need lives to be lost before something is done.”

But will they take notice??

Won't they just say sorry, and say we need to do something, but that something will never bring A&E back to wycombe.

Darren Hayday says...
2:31pm Fri 1 Feb 13

This is what you get when you try and heal a broken leg with a sticky plaster...

But there will be no back down and a return to an A&E @ Wycombe because of ego's and reputations in management, etc

This is what we are forced with and only more unfortunate loss of lives are going to be the only way before they do turn-around.

stir up says...
6:04pm Fri 1 Feb 13

As already mentioned this is mainly due to the closure of the department in Wycombe and this is also the reason why queues in the department at Stoke are longer. It was so obvious that this would happen because the numbers were bound to increase when you close one place and expect the open one to take double the number of people. The cost of running ambulances to Aylesbury was also going to outstrip any savings. These managers are paid to supposedly run things properly but it seems they do not have the nounce to look at the implications of their actions in the longer term.

motco says...
6:32pm Fri 1 Feb 13

I seem to recall this change starting under the last government and continuing under the coalition. Fat chance, therefore, of any serious attempt at improvement. On the plus side, I suspect that you aren't counted as waiting in A&E until you arrive in the department. Ipso facto A&E waiting times are down! To quote the desk sergeant in Hills Street Blues: "Let's be careful out there!"

Arutha says...
10:37pm Fri 1 Feb 13

I'm beginning to think that the only way that we'll get an A&E unit back in Wycombe is if we set one up ourselves, that operates something like the old Cottage Hospital in Marlow used to, able to deal with anything that didn't require an X-Ray.
This would be better the the minor injuries unit we have now I suspect.
Any retired nurses want to do volunteer work?

shaky2 says...
1:25am Sat 2 Feb 13

How long before someones life is lost because of this situation

daemonite says...
8:39am Sat 2 Feb 13

I had to wait 12 hours for an ambulance to take my wife to hospital, and that was after I phoned up after 12 hours and they thought that my wife had been collected. This is yet another example of how not to run a health service. One of the contributing factors I think is that the NHS is treating far too many patients that have never contributed into the funding.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree