Attorney General thought gay marriage bill wasn't necessary

Attorney General thought gay marriage bill wasn't necessary Attorney General thought gay marriage bill wasn't necessary

DOMINIC Grieve, the Beaconsfield MP, says he abstained over the gay marriage vote in Parliament because he questioned its necessity.

The Attorney General, whose constituency includes Marlow, was one of 176 Conservative MPs who did not support the Government.

Normally he would be bound by collective responsibility as a Cabinet Minister to vote with the Government – or have to step down.

But the Prime Minister allowed a free vote and two Cabinet members in fact voted against the bill.

Mr Grieve insisted his decision would not have come a surprise to his colleagues.

Despite his reservations, Mr Grieve emphasised he does not believe the bill will force churches to have same sex marriages against their will.

He told the MFP: "I don't think that will happen. Nevertheless, there's a question about whether this legislation is in fact needed and whether it's necessary and the right way of going about creating equality. I have doubts about that."

A large number of constituents wrote to him about the issue.

"This was the biggest I've ever had, it ran to hundreds and hundreds of emails," he said.

"Overwhelmingly these were against the proposal."

A few did support the bill though some members of the Beaconsfield Conservative Association have indicated they will resign as a result, he added.

He believes the impact on the Conservative party has been exaggerated, with differences in opinion on all sides of the House of Commons.

Wycombe MP Steve Baker, Chesham and Amersham MP Cheryl Gillan and Aylesbury MP David Lidington voted against.

Comments(9)

thethe says...
3:04pm Fri 8 Feb 13

It's indicative of the white middle class middle aged population who live in his constituency.

Scarletto says...
3:35pm Fri 8 Feb 13

Dominic Grieve and some of the other Tories are disloyal to their party, their colleagues in the House and still persist in their discrimination against a minority who just want equality with others. No more than that..

Peter Cyprus says...
4:14pm Fri 8 Feb 13

Scarletto wrote:
Dominic Grieve and some of the other Tories are disloyal to their party, their colleagues in the House and still persist in their discrimination against a minority who just want equality with others. No more than that..
The only people who suffer discrimination are english speaking white, Christian heterosexuals! Obviously you are talking about homosexuals who currently have the same rights as heterosexuals to Marty someone of the opposite sex.

Peter Cyprus says...
4:15pm Fri 8 Feb 13

Peter Cyprus wrote:
Scarletto wrote:
Dominic Grieve and some of the other Tories are disloyal to their party, their colleagues in the House and still persist in their discrimination against a minority who just want equality with others. No more than that..
The only people who suffer discrimination are english speaking white, Christian heterosexuals! Obviously you are talking about homosexuals who currently have the same rights as heterosexuals to Marty someone of the opposite sex.
Should, of course read 'marry'.

Mutley says...
6:33pm Fri 8 Feb 13

thethe wrote:
It's indicative of the white middle class middle aged population who live in his constituency.
I don't know what "it" is, but if you're referring to opposition to the bill then I would say it's far more likely that opposition would come from muslims, sikhs, hindus, the black community and others whose faith means a lot to them rather than white middle-class Beaconsfield-ites.

yog says...
7:31pm Fri 8 Feb 13

Same old Tories. Nothings changed here.

downleylocal says...
10:22am Sat 9 Feb 13

Peter Cyprus wrote:
Peter Cyprus wrote:
Scarletto wrote:
Dominic Grieve and some of the other Tories are disloyal to their party, their colleagues in the House and still persist in their discrimination against a minority who just want equality with others. No more than that..
The only people who suffer discrimination are english speaking white, Christian heterosexuals! Obviously you are talking about homosexuals who currently have the same rights as heterosexuals to Marty someone of the opposite sex.
Should, of course read 'marry'.
I think Marty was right all along.

Old Paths says...
1:08pm Mon 11 Feb 13

It is clear enough who the real conservatives are in this debate - those who defend and uphold the traditional family as being one man and one woman.
Outside of that the PC brigade have it !

Bill Taxpayer says...
4:42pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Peter Cyprus wrote:
Scarletto wrote: Dominic Grieve and some of the other Tories are disloyal to their party, their colleagues in the House and still persist in their discrimination against a minority who just want equality with others. No more than that..
The only people who suffer discrimination are english speaking white, Christian heterosexuals! Obviously you are talking about homosexuals who currently have the same rights as heterosexuals to Marty someone of the opposite sex.
What about a homosexual's right to marry the person they love?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree