Bucks hospitals to be investigated over death rates (From Bucks Free Press)
Send your news, photos and videos by texting bucksfreepress to 80360 or email
Bucks hospitals to be investigated over death rates
9:08am Tuesday 12th February 2013 in News By Lawrence Dunhill
Bucks hospitals to be investigated over death rates
HOSPITALS in Buckinghamshire are to be investigated over their patient deaths rates, say health officials.
Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust is one of nine trusts which have been ‘outliers’ on the Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR) for two years running.
Sir Bruce Keogh, medical director of the NHS Commissioning Board, said: “The purpose of my investigation is to assure patients, public and Parliament that these hospitals understand why they have a high mortality and have all the support they need to improve…
“These hospitals are already working closely with a range of regulators. If there were concerns that services were unsafe the regulators should have intervened.”
Last week Sir Bruce announced probes into five trusts which were identified by a different measure, the Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI), as having higher than expected mortality rates.
This followed the publication of the Francis Report, which highlighted the "appalling and unnecessary suffering of hundreds of patients" at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust between 2005 and 2009.
Years of abuse and neglect at the hospital led to the unnecessary deaths of hundreds of patients, and inquiry chairman Robert Francis QC said the failings went right to the top of the health service.
He made 290 recommendations, saying "fundamental change" was needed to prevent the public losing confidence.
Mr Francis said the Trust’s board did not listen sufficiently to its patients and staff or ensure the correction of deficiencies brought to their attention, adding: “Above all, it failed to tackle an insidious negative culture involving a tolerance of poor standards and a disengagement from managerial and leadership responsibilities.
“This failure was in part the consequence of allowing a focus on reaching national access targets, achieving financial balance and seeking foundation trust status to be at the cost of delivering acceptable standards of care.”
He said checks and balances within the NHS should have prevented a serious systemic failure of this sort, but the problems were not detected by scrutiny groups, commissioners, regulators and professional bodies.
Concerns about Mid-Staffordshire had initially been raised by the authors of the Doctor Foster Hospital Guide, which publishes the HSMR figures.
Buckinghamshire Healthcare says action plans have been put in place to understand its high HSMR, and it has seen an improvement year-on-year as a result.
Lynne Swiatczak, Chief Nurse and Director of Patient Care Standards, said: “Our regular detailed reviews of patient case notes and mortality data has not identified any areas of concern with patient care, but our task force and Trust Board continues to look in-depth at this issue.
“As a provider of a wide range of services including acute care, five community hospitals, and a hospice, we have also been working with independent experts to understand how this may impact on our HSMR.
“We welcome the approach being taken by Sir Bruce’s review, in particular the additional support and assurance it will provide to, and build upon, our own work. We will ensure this review is given our full support.”
Comments(16)
Mrs DaPoint
says...
9:43am Tue 12 Feb 13
Jade12
says...
9:47am Tue 12 Feb 13
Darren Hayday wrote:You are so right! This has been long overdue, hopefully they can sort out this mess.
I'm glad that this Trust is being investigated (at long last) - as I don’t believe that they listen to us. If they were listening, then we would have out lost services returned - especially our A&E department and also maternity, SCBU, etc
Yes Wycombe hospital is old and would need to be rebuilt - but it is wrong to slowly close it down and make us travel miles to surrounding hospitals.
QualityCare4all
says...
9:48am Tue 12 Feb 13
In 2009 mortality rates were 114 (normal is 100)
In 2010 rate was 118.
In 2011 rate was 112.
In 2012 rate was 110.
Not good but showing improvement. Is it all parts of the hospital or just some services? Cardiology perhaps? We need more info please.
Why no investigation after 2010?
Why now?
Mike Henson
says...
11:37am Tue 12 Feb 13
rachie6991
says...
12:00pm Tue 12 Feb 13
wayneo
says...
12:08pm Tue 12 Feb 13
Voyeur
says...
12:48pm Tue 12 Feb 13
J B Blackett
says...
1:02pm Tue 12 Feb 13
Mike Henson wrote:A rather uneducated insensitive and misinformed comment
Err, people do die in hospital, it's a given. What's needed is ages against those figures so the older and terminally ill can be excluded.
Scarletto
says...
3:30pm Tue 12 Feb 13
looper
says...
9:12pm Tue 12 Feb 13
QualityCare4all
says...
10:28am Wed 13 Feb 13
Sadly it seems that each year there are accidents that result in harm and sometime death to patients.
The recent Francis report makes soem recommendations about the handling of complaints: http://cdn.midstaffs
publicinquiry.com/si
tes/default/files/re
port/Executive%20sum
mary.pdf
See nos. 109-122. No 118 is particularly interesting as it suggests that a report of each complaint is published on line . They had 700 complaints in 2011-12.
This action would show that the trust is learning and improving.
We need that feedback.
rjpastaw
says...
12:25pm Wed 13 Feb 13
How it can be either right or efficient to centralise major medical services onto a site which is both unprepared for and unsuitable for that purpose - and that's without the added drawback of being sited on a minor road - If that represents the level of medical competence, planning and commitment to effective medical care in Bucks then may God help us all - clearly the "professionals" wont....
rjpastaw
says...
12:30pm Wed 13 Feb 13
rjpastaw
says...
12:33pm Wed 13 Feb 13
J B Blackett wrote:I fully agree - Henson's posting is both arrogant and patronizing - I wonder if he is by any chance a doctor?
Mike Henson wrote:A rather uneducated insensitive and misinformed comment
Err, people do die in hospital, it's a given. What's needed is ages against those figures so the older and terminally ill can be excluded.
Edgar Brooks
says...
9:04pm Wed 13 Feb 13
rjpastaw wrote:It's doubtful that he's old; when he gets into his 70s it's a safe bet that he won't feel quite so ready to be dismissed and written off.
J B Blackett wrote:I fully agree - Henson's posting is both arrogant and patronizing - I wonder if he is by any chance a doctor?Mike Henson wrote: Err, people do die in hospital, it's a given. What's needed is ages against those figures so the older and terminally ill can be excluded.A rather uneducated insensitive and misinformed comment
If all of these enquiries get us back to the days when doctors worked with their patients, it'll be a huge step in the right direction; I, for one, am heartily sick of being talked AT, instead of being listened TO.
Darren Hayday says...
9:35am Tue 12 Feb 13
Yes Wycombe hospital is old and would need to be rebuilt - but it is wrong to slowly close it down and make us travel miles to surrounding hospitals.