Updated: Ex-parish clerk jailed for £28k council fraud (From Bucks Free Press)
Send your news, photos and videos by texting bucksfreepress to 80360 or email
Ex-parish clerk Lynne Turner jailed for £28k council fraud
12:36pm Friday 15th February 2013 in News By Rebecca Cain
Ex-parish clerk jailed for £28k council fraud
FORMER Hughenden Parish Council clerk Lynne Turner has been jailed for nine months for transferring £28,200 of public money into her personal account.
The 50-year-old of Tancred Road, High Wycombe, was found guilty of ten counts of fraud by abuse of position last month.
She was sentenced to nine months behind bars for each count – to run concurrently – at Oxford Crown Court today.
The charges relate to her time as clerk of the parish council, where she moved £28,200 from the council's bank account to her own between August 2010 and May 2011 in 31 different transactions.
His Honour Judge Pringle QC said she had abused the trust of the parish council and the residents in the parish and he had no other option but to serve her a jail sentence.
He said: "You expect people, particularly those who are serving the community when placed in a position of trust, to honour the trust that people place in them and to behave with propriety and you sorely failed to do so."
Prosecution Jerome Silva explained how the current clerk, Charlotte Watts, noticed the discrepancies in the accounts when she started at the council after Turner resigned.
Defence Dejan Mladenovic said Turner had previous good character.
He said a psychiatric report showed she had adjustment disorder where she behaves in a way that is inextricably linked to her inability to acknowledge any wrongful acts.
He said: "It is part and parcel of the reason why she had difficulties accepting her criminality in the first place."
He added: "Mrs Turner does intend and does want to repay all of the mony she took and defrauded the parish council of.
"I am told by her she would be in a position to begin making these repayments within the next six to seven months."
He said the case has caused stress to herself and her family and she deeply regrets her actions.
In his summing up his His Honour Judge Pringle QC said: "You are 50 years of age. You have no previous convictions of any sort and until 2010 you, Mrs Turner, worked hard, it seems all your life.
"You brought up your family in what, I suspect, was a commendable way.
"In 2010 you had been working for Hughenden Parish Council for 16 years as the clerk to the parish council finances.
"Many of the parish council in the time you served there got to know you well and you were completely trusted by them.
"It would, it seems, be the case that you were continued to be trusted by them up until and during the course of your trial because you called two of them as character witnesses.
"The plain fact of the matter is that you, Mrs Turner, abused that trust- the trust that had been placed in you by the parish council and all the residents of that parish.
"In August 2010, no doubt because of financial pressures you had got yourself into, you began to divert funds from the parish accounts into your own personal account.
"You started slowly. £300 was the first amount, then another £300 and after a month or so you obviously became confident and sums of £1,000- sometimes on consecutive days- were placed in your own bank account.
"The total amount came to just over £30,000.
"You expect people, particularly those who are serving the community when placed in a position of trust to honour the trust that people place in them, to behave with propriety and you sorely failed to do so."
Comments(24)
Jay-Tee
says...
1:37pm Fri 15 Feb 13
JACK-Wooburn
says...
1:44pm Fri 15 Feb 13
Swains
says...
1:53pm Fri 15 Feb 13
spudlum
says...
1:55pm Fri 15 Feb 13
BOOKERite
says...
2:03pm Fri 15 Feb 13
sparky49 wrote:Is a Parish Clerk a politician?
Another bent politician and a tory to boot.
Sparkles26
says...
2:06pm Fri 15 Feb 13
Marmite XO
says...
2:10pm Fri 15 Feb 13
For that reason I'd have sentenced her for longer.
buser
says...
2:43pm Fri 15 Feb 13
Marmite XO wrote:Perhaps because she couldn't put her
I don't see why she didn't just pay it back straight away and avoid all the costs and time of going to court.
For that reason I'd have sentenced her for longer.
hands on the odd £30,000? From the original text, she stole the money because she was in debt.
Marmite XO
says...
2:49pm Fri 15 Feb 13
buser wrote:Oh come on, who can't get their hands on 30k in an emergency.
Marmite XO wrote:Perhaps because she couldn't put her
I don't see why she didn't just pay it back straight away and avoid all the costs and time of going to court.
For that reason I'd have sentenced her for longer.
hands on the odd £30,000? From the original text, she stole the money because she was in debt.
Jay-Tee
says...
3:13pm Fri 15 Feb 13
Sparkles26 wrote:She knows perfectly well how a housewife and a mother should behave, having done a fantastic job at both.. again you shouldnt just believe everything you read on the internet, and to further on what spudlum has said gain correct information before jumping to conclusions on a matter that neither concerns you directly or personally and that you know nothing about.
" normal housewife"?!! what's normal about ripping people off! Hope she has time to reflect on how a "normal housewife and mother should behave
sparky49
says...
4:06pm Fri 15 Feb 13
Jay-Tee wrote:Hello
Unless you know her personally or were present at the court hearing, I dont believe you have any right to call her a 'bent politician'?
A convicted thief, who broke the parish councils trust and stole money.
How is that not bent?
sparky49
says...
4:09pm Fri 15 Feb 13
Jay-Tee wrote:You seem well informed and upset about comments, then tell us what we don't know or accept that people will draw their own conclusions.
Sparkles26 wrote:She knows perfectly well how a housewife and a mother should behave, having done a fantastic job at both.. again you shouldnt just believe everything you read on the internet, and to further on what spudlum has said gain correct information before jumping to conclusions on a matter that neither concerns you directly or personally and that you know nothing about.
" normal housewife"?!! what's normal about ripping people off! Hope she has time to reflect on how a "normal housewife and mother should behave
As it has been said before a convicted thief who broke trust and stole money.
Minority Report
says...
4:45pm Fri 15 Feb 13
Swains
says...
5:07pm Fri 15 Feb 13
N17YIDDOS
says...
5:08pm Fri 15 Feb 13
I am so glad that Lynne Turner has been found to be someone who abused her position - she did this in general regarding her dealings with residents - she was only a clerk after all. The previous HPC who backed her up should be ashamed that all this happened on their watch and this shows how poor they were as a public body.
buser
says...
5:11pm Fri 15 Feb 13
Marmite XO wrote:Sadly, I understand, quite a few. I personally know someone who owes that sort of amount to HMCE and they certainly aren't a one off. If you have no credit rating and no one is prepared to bail you out, short of 'misappropriating' the money, the choices seem limited.
buser wrote:Oh come on, who can't get their hands on 30k in an emergency.
Marmite XO wrote:Perhaps because she couldn't put her
I don't see why she didn't just pay it back straight away and avoid all the costs and time of going to court.
For that reason I'd have sentenced her for longer.
hands on the odd £30,000? From the original text, she stole the money because she was in debt.
Swains
says...
5:51pm Fri 15 Feb 13
buser
says...
6:12pm Fri 15 Feb 13
buser wrote:I wasn't suggesting that everybody owing this sort of money resorted to stealing. I was saying raising £30,000 was not always easy or possible. The case I quoted face a 2nd bankruptcy and losing their home. Sometimes the money involved in the proceedings is literally the tip of the iceberg and a lot more money is owed elsewhere. There is help out there and the letters can be helpful but just getting £30,000 with zero credit rating isn't a question of just asking. For me, there is no excuse for theft.
Marmite XO wrote:Sadly, I understand, quite a few. I personally know someone who owes that sort of amount to HMCE and they certainly aren't a one off. If you have no credit rating and no one is prepared to bail you out, short of 'misappropriating' the money, the choices seem limited.
buser wrote:Oh come on, who can't get their hands on 30k in an emergency.
Marmite XO wrote:Perhaps because she couldn't put her
I don't see why she didn't just pay it back straight away and avoid all the costs and time of going to court.
For that reason I'd have sentenced her for longer.
hands on the odd £30,000? From the original text, she stole the money because she was in debt.
Minority Report
says...
6:21pm Fri 15 Feb 13
Minority Report
says...
7:16pm Fri 15 Feb 13
NobodyParticular
says...
7:16pm Fri 15 Feb 13
ImpeturbableLawrence
says...
9:48pm Fri 15 Feb 13
Stand up for England
says...
11:32pm Fri 15 Feb 13
NobodyParticular wrote:No, it means all will be served at the same time. She will be in prison for 9 months and all sentences deemed to have been served. A joke in the system !!... but I'll bet she doesn't serve anything like 9 months !!
Sorry not to do with the above argument but would like a little clarity: It says she has been sentenced to 9 months but then later says "She was sentenced to nine months behind bars for each count – to run concurrently – at Oxford Crown Court today." As she was found guilty of 10 counts does that mean she's been sentenced to 90 months?
sparky49 says...
1:18pm Fri 15 Feb 13