Councillors' concerns at government planning rule change proposal

Cllr Graham Harris

Cllr Graham Harris

First published in News Bucks Free Press: Photograph of the Author by , Reporter

BUSINESSES in the Chiltern district could be negatively affected by government plans to make it easier to convert buildings into housing, council bosses fear.

Local authorities around the country are currently being consulted over proposed changes to planning regulations.

They would make it easier to convert retail and financial business premises into new homes in a bid to help councils meet housing targets.

And while members of Chiltern District Council are searching for ways of meeting housing needs in the district, they also fear the proposed changes will have a negative impact on businesses in the region's towns.

Cabinet members said at a meeting yesterday communities in the Chiltern district could end up 'poorer' if businesses were forced to look elsewhere for premises to operate from.

Council leader Isobel Darby said: "Whilst it's good to relax certain rules, our fear is it can perhaps go too far, especially in an area such as ours where there's such a demand for housing.

"We could end up losing retail units and it could be very difficult to change them back at a later date.

"We could end up with poorer communities because they will lack some of the things they will need."

Cllr Graham Harris, cabinet member for sustainable development, added: "We could end up with a substantial amount of retail property being used for residential. We could see a shortage of facilities to promote local businesses."

Cllr Harris said he would respond to the consultation and reflect members' concerns on the proposals.

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:19pm Wed 27 Aug 14

BucksComment says...

Well, possibly, but better that than concreting over the Green Belt.

No new housing ever seems to consider the infrastructure required to support it anyway
Well, possibly, but better that than concreting over the Green Belt. No new housing ever seems to consider the infrastructure required to support it anyway BucksComment
  • Score: 6

6:22pm Wed 27 Aug 14

faircuppa says...

This is already taking place anyway but will not meet the demand for family housing. See Boots development Wycombe High St. Roads and schools are the main pressures but the ConDemNation has introduced Infrastructure Levy to compensate! Let us see how far that stretches after councillors have top sliced it for vanity projects.
This is already taking place anyway but will not meet the demand for family housing. See Boots development Wycombe High St. Roads and schools are the main pressures but the ConDemNation has introduced Infrastructure Levy to compensate! Let us see how far that stretches after councillors have top sliced it for vanity projects. faircuppa
  • Score: 1

9:40am Thu 28 Aug 14

Kania 2000 says...

Since the changes to rates exemption on empty commercial premises, it is only to be expected the owners will seek to make alternative use of commercial premises.
Since the changes to rates exemption on empty commercial premises, it is only to be expected the owners will seek to make alternative use of commercial premises. Kania 2000
  • Score: 3

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree