News RSS Feed


News index forum banner.

Green light given to extend Adams Park

9:28am Friday 25th April 2008

comment Comments (9)   Have your say »


THE battle to keep London Wasps in High Wycombe has been given a major boost after a Government inspector said the Adams Park stadium should be taken out of the green belt.

This decision will make it easier to expand and eventually sell the stadium - owned by Wycombe Wanderers - so the two clubs can move to a bigger home.

“We are disappointed that the restraint on the green belt has gone"

Nigel Phillips, chairman of Sands Residents’ Association

Rugby giants Wasps have previously threatened to leave Wycombe unless more seats were found, and this new development could increase the capacity to around 12,500.

Wanderers managing director Steve Hayes, , said of the inspector's decision: "This makes life a lot easier."

The Hillbottom Road, Sands, stadium only holds 10,000 - but Wasps have been told by its league that it must have at least an extra 2,500 seats to play in the Guinness Premiership.

Wanderers could pocket £1m an acre when Adams Park is finally sold after it was taken out of the heavily protected green belt, a leading estate agent said.

Chartered surveyor Alan Chandler of Stupples, High Wycombe said: "The stadium site would be worth £1m an acre if it was sold as a brownfield industrial site - there is demand for industrial sites at Sands.

"If it was a green belt site, it would be worth the going rate for agricultural land which is £4,000 an acre."

The Planning Inspectorate this week approved plans by Wycombe District Council to take the stadium and its car park out of the green belt.

Wanderers boss Steve Hayes said the news boosted their plans to put in temporary seating to accommodate Wasps' fan base.

Mr Hayes, Wanderers' managing director and a major shareholder in Wasps, said: "We are looking at temporary seating for the Wasps for the future"

He said: "The council may be willing to help, Wanderers may be willing to help and you are half-way there.

"But you have to go through a great deal of red tape when it is on the green belt."

Extra seating would make a huge difference' until the stadium moved, he said.

Mr Hayes said: "We and the council don't want to see Wasps leaving the town so we have to work together to make this a win-win situation."

But conservation leaders yesterday hit out at the news which they say means a precious part of the green belt will be lost.

They said the site is now likely to be used for industrial units, similar to the surrounding industrial estate. Housing will not be allowed.

Tony Fooks, vice chairman of The High Wycombe Society, which works to protect the town's heritage, said: "We are concerned as to what could happen to the site should Adams Park be moved.

"We would like to have seen it return to the green belt. Green belt does allow for some stadium and recreation facilities but it doesn't mean it should be used for light industrial."

The news showed the danger of green belt being lost by stealth', said Mike Chadwick of the Chiltern Society.

He said: "It means when circumstances change down the road the green belt has been lost permanently."

Residents have long complained about the ground, the final building in Hillbottom Road before High Wycombe east spills into countryside, as it is at a dead end and can only be accessed from Lane End Road.

Nigel Phillips, chairman of Sands Residents' Association, said: "We are disappointed that the restraint on the green belt has gone but on the other hand it will make it easier for the site to be sold."

Residents were far more pleased that two fields in Lane End Road had been put into the green belt, he said.

Councillor Hugh McCarthy, responsible for planning at the council, said the change in status reflected the area's built up nature'.

He said: "This fits with our long term vision for that area, that Adams Park would ultimately become an extension of the employment area."

The council recommended the change in its Wycombe Development Framework Core Strategy, which the Planning Inspectorate has to give final approval for.

It will be adopted by the council in July.


Your Say YourBucks Free Press

TQWood, Hazlemere says...
9:54am Fri 25 Apr 08

seems to me its all about the Wasps, why dont they get their own stadium! why are they even based in Wycombe? The local interest should be for Wycombe Wanderers not this interloper.

slacker, Flackwell says...
10:12am Fri 25 Apr 08

I wouldnt knock the Wasps being here, they bring money to the town and money to the Wycombe Wanderers club.

mac, HW says...
10:12am Fri 25 Apr 08

Another 2500 people to create more traffic and congestion in Sands on match days. whoopee.

DaveyBoy2008, high Wycombe says...
10:25am Fri 25 Apr 08

Its temporary seating. It's about time the club got a new ground! Especially if they got to share a ground with a premiership rugby club.

stewj, Loudwater says...
1:33pm Fri 25 Apr 08

good news for the club about time too

David St, High Wycombe says...
1:42pm Fri 25 Apr 08

I'd rather see it being purely a rugby stadium. Wanderers is way too expensive to watch in comparison.

Mike R, Wycombe says...
2:12pm Fri 25 Apr 08

Good news for Wanderers, Wasps and Wycombe in my opinion. Although a new stadium site does need to be found sooner rather than later as the traffic down there on matchdays is pure chaos.

Ron Schreck, says...
6:47pm Fri 25 Apr 08

TQWood wrote:
seems to me its all about the Wasps, why dont they get their own stadium! why are they even based in Wycombe? The local interest should be for Wycombe Wanderers not this interloper.
Without the Wasps groundshare agreement with the Wanderers, the football club would not be able to survive financially and would continue to go in the red to the point they have to sell their best players just to stay afloat. Once they sell their players, the only ones playing for the Wanderers are the beggers who will play for almost nothing just to be in a league team. they will then be relegated out of the league. I think I remember something similar to this a few years back. when the clubs lost out on the TV money and one chairman decided to cut back. He sold his best players, gave the rest a cut in pay, and gave no money to bring in new GOOD players. THAT is why Wycombe is now playing in League 2 instead of League 1 or the Championship. They blamed it all on Sanchez and gave him the sack. A manager can only do as good as his bosses let him.
okay back to the subject. I have noticed that the average attendance at the football games in Wycombe has been around 5,000 in a stadium that holds 10,000. enuff said.

Mike R, Wycombe says...
6:37pm Sun 27 Apr 08

Ron, a good point made about the attendance stuff. Although I dont support WW I love watching football and have often wanted to go down but the prices they charge for league 2 football is just far too much in my opinion.

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Links


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »