Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting bfp news to 80360 or email »
12:20pm Wednesday 7th May 2008
A YOUTH has been made the subject of an Anti-Social Behaviour Order for conduct described as "extensive, appalling and unacceptable" by a court.
Anthony Crawford, 17, has been warned he will "inevitably" be sent to prison if he breaches the terms of his ASBO within the next two years.
The Bourne End teenager was served the ASBO yesterday by Wycombe District Council and Thames Valley Police.
The chairman of the bench at Wycombe Magistrates Court said of Crawford's behaviour: "It was committed over a long period and you have shown total disregard, not only to yourself and your family, but to neighbours and to others in the community, and in particular towards the police."
He added: "That behaviour will have caused harrassment, alarm and stress.
"This behaviour continued after several very significant interventions by the authorities. You simply have not responded to anything else."
A photograph of Crawford has been released because he was "approaching the age of maturity", and the picture's publication was "necessary and proportionate" to his behaviour, said the chairman of the bench.
Under the terms of his ASBO, Crawford is prohibited from driving or riding any motorised vehicle in any public place without the permission of the owner, without a licence or without legal documentation for the next two years.
He is also barred from being abusive, insulting or threatening and from using intimidating language or behaviour, and also from damaging, taking or interfering with the property of others without permission.
FH, Amersham says...
1:22pm Wed 7 May 08
Under the terms of his ASBO, Crawford is prohibited from driving or riding any motorised vehicle in any public place without the permission of the owner, without a license or without legal documentation for the next two years.All those things are illegal anyway, all the time (not jsut two years) and for everyone. So why bother with the ASBO? If that's what he does, send him through the normal courts and charge him with actual crimes.
Bella, Wycombe says...
1:22pm Wed 7 May 08
FH, Amersham says...
1:26pm Wed 7 May 08
Under the terms of his ASBO, Crawford is prohibited from driving or riding any motorised vehicle in any public place without the permission of the owner, without a license or without legal documentation for the next two years.All those things are illegal anyway, all the time (not jsut two years) and for everyone. So why bother with the ASBO? If that's what he does, send him through the normal courts and charge him with actual crimes.
Nige_Wycombe, High Wycombe says...
2:09pm Wed 7 May 08
Nige_Wycombe, High Wycombe says...
2:10pm Wed 7 May 08
Elmo, High Wycombe says...
2:11pm Wed 7 May 08
LillyMoe, High Wycombe says...
2:18pm Wed 7 May 08
Marmite, HW says...
4:54pm Wed 7 May 08
mungefuddler, totteridge says...
5:31pm Wed 7 May 08
Bella, Wycombe says...
5:37pm Wed 7 May 08
yabbadabbadoo, wooburn green says...
8:00pm Wed 7 May 08
Carlton De Souza, Bowerdean area says...
9:46pm Wed 7 May 08
woooooopy, wycombe says...
9:51pm Wed 7 May 08
smokey, high wycombe says...
9:54pm Wed 7 May 08
Anto, bourne end says...
9:55pm Wed 7 May 08
spotty, Holmer Green says...
10:23pm Wed 7 May 08
Dad, Bourne End On Thames, Bucks. says...
10:38pm Wed 7 May 08
HWMAN, High Wycombe says...
5:38am Thu 8 May 08
Steve, Totteridge Hill says...
8:15am Thu 8 May 08
smokey, high wycombe says...
9:47am Thu 8 May 08
Steve, Totteridge Hill says...
12:31pm Thu 8 May 08
smokey wrote:I like your style...but missed something?
I think the word "no" is not used enough. I think that threats need to be made and carried out. I think that children from a very very young age should be taught to respect adults. Remove TV, DVD's, computers etc from young children's bedrooms. You are killing them with kindness. Above all, teach them that respect has to be earned and they have no rights - just priviledges ( when i say rights I obviously do not mean the basic human rights of foos, sleep roof over head etc.) I mean the automatic assumption that interrupting conversations is right, that just because their friends have all the latest stuff doesn't mean that they can. That they do not have the right to talk to you like a piece of dirt. I also find that teens like boundaries -it gives them somthing to moan about. Above all life experience counts and at the end of the day, young people need to realise that. BTW I do have an 18 year old and a 21 year old so I am speakng from experience.
smokey, high wycombe says...
2:38pm Thu 8 May 08
Steve wrote:oh - sorry!
smokey wrote: I think the word "no" is not used enough. I think that threats need to be made and carried out. I think that children from a very very young age should be taught to respect adults. Remove TV, DVD's, computers etc from young children's bedrooms. You are killing them with kindness. Above all, teach them that respect has to be earned and they have no rights - just priviledges ( when i say rights I obviously do not mean the basic human rights of foos, sleep roof over head etc.) I mean the automatic assumption that interrupting conversations is right, that just because their friends have all the latest stuff doesn't mean that they can. That they do not have the right to talk to you like a piece of dirt. I also find that teens like boundaries -it gives them somthing to moan about. Above all life experience counts and at the end of the day, young people need to realise that. BTW I do have an 18 year old and a 21 year old so I am speakng from experience.I like your style...but missed something? Are you saying you deprived your kids of these things or you have problems because you didn't? I've a 13 year old that has to ask permission to watch TV, play on pc, watch dvd etc. Her friends think she's hard done by...I know she's better behaved because of it. AND she still loves us... The first word she learnt was NO, and we don't get any chat back if I say because I said so when she is refused something. Cruel aren't we...
woooooopy, wycombe says...
7:17pm Thu 8 May 08
Mario, Bucks says...
11:22am Sat 10 May 08
Steve, Totteridge Hill says...
9:11am Sun 11 May 08
Mario wrote:Proof that the state is mad!
Did you know a couple of police forces in England an Wales have successfully prosecuted parents under the 1997 Protection from Harrasment Act? On one occasion, a child made a complaint to the police about mental abuse (because the parents had withdrawn his computer and tv). On another occasion a teacher made a complaint to the police about economic abuse (as the parents had withdrawn a child's pocket money facility). Another mother and father have also been successfully prosecuted for false imprisonment for locking their child in the bedroom. Parenting is now largely controlled by the State, whether you like it or not. If someone makes a complaint about your parenting decisions it becomes a completely different ball game!
Elmo, High Wycombe says...
9:46am Mon 12 May 08
FH, Amersham says...
1:53pm Wed 14 May 08
police forces in England an Wales have successfully prosecuted parents under the 1997 Protection from Harrasment Act?
On one occasion, a child made a complaint to the police about mental abuse (because the parents had withdrawn his computer and tv).
SoupSHVS, bourne end says...
7:23pm Tue 8 Jul 08
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find a job in High Wycombe and all around Buckinghamshire.
Search Now »
Make a date in High Wycombe and Buckinghamshire now!
Search Now »
Search for properties all over High Wycombe and across the UK.
Search Now »
Find used vehicles for sale in High Wycombe and all over Buckinghamshire
Search Now »
Bella, Wycombe says...
1:16pm Wed 7 May 08