News RSS Feed


News index forum banner.

Review call for infamous murderer of Bucks man

2:49pm Wednesday 4th June 2008

comment Comments (19)   Have your say »


RESIDENTS are being urged to back a call for a review into the case of the last woman to be hanged in Britain for the killing of a Penn man.

The sister of Ruth Ellis is backing an online petition calling on prime minister Gordon Brown to review her case.

Ellis was sent to the gallows in 1955 aged 28 for the murder of boyfriend David Blakely at a pub in Hampstead, north London.

He was buried in Penn churchyard. Ellis' family wanted her to be buried next to Blakely but could not find the space and she was interred at St Mary's Church, Amersham.

Ellis was arrested at the scene of the murder at the Magdala pub on April 10, Easter Sunday and infamously told her trial "it's obvious when I shot him I intended to kill him".

Yet her elder sister Muriel Jakubait and writer Monica Weller allege in a book that a friend of Ellis', Desmond Cussen, pulled the trigger and have launched the campaign for justice.

So far 175 people have signed the petition and Mrs Weller said the year-long plea for support, to close on July 4, had been hit by a lack of publicity.

Mrs Weller told the Bucks Free Press: "I hope that people who are interested in justice will support the petition and request the prime minister to look again."

She said she had uncovered new evidence which demanded a review of Ellis' case.

Mrs Weller, of Bookham, Surrey, said Ellis, her hands crippled by rheumatic fever, would not have been able to fire the gun, a .38mm Smith and Wesson revolver.

And she said she tracked the police officer who attended the scene and was told Ellis did not have blood on her clothing - disputing the claim she fired one shot at point blank range.

In 2003 the Court of Appeal rejected a review of the case, which helped further opposition to the death penalty, finally abolished in 1964.

The petition is at http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/RuthEllis55/


Your Say YourBucks Free Press

Franky, High Wycombe says...
8:16pm Wed 4 Jun 08

How about signing a petition for the British troops to leave all the places they have no right to be? That would actually save their lives and the lives of others. Why waste time and energy on something that makes no difference to the world we live in?

slacker, Flackwell says...
11:36pm Wed 4 Jun 08

What is the point? Its a long time history and we have to think of the present. She admitted it so it is a done deal.

I can think of better things to spend the money on rather than an expensive enquiry.

Elizabeth Morcombe, says...
10:55am Thu 5 Jun 08

It was Desmond Cussen not Cullen - read Robert Hancock's book 'Ruth Ellis-the last woman to be hanged' -an authoritative read which dispels many myths about Ruth Ellis
quote

wayne, wycombe says...
3:26pm Thu 5 Jun 08

Err, she murdered a man with a revolver, she was found guilty by a Jury and hanged, why is this non-event even being considered as newsworthy?

monica weller, leatherhead says...
7:58pm Thu 5 Jun 08

Slacker Flackwell asked 'what is the point?' The point is that the details about the case were in closed files for 50 years. Only now are we beginning to see what was actually going on in 1955.I do not agree with Elizabeth Morcombe that Robert Hancock's book dispels the myths about Ruth Ellis.How can she be sure about that? Mr Hancock admits in his book that he also wrote the serialised life story of Ruth for the Woman's Sunday Mirror in 1955.Ruth Ellis was not allowed to see journalists whilst she was in the condemned cell yet the author apparently interviewed her there.Franky in High Wycombe 'can think of better things to spend the money on'.In order to move forward in this life we need to learn from history. And the true story of Ruth Ellis is one story that needs to be blown wide open.It has not been told truthfully. Wayne of Wycombe has understandably, like many, taken the accepted story about Ruth Ellis at face value. We know now that Ruth Ellis lied in court to protect somebody. She was a humble, very poor person, who had been brainwashed by men with influence.Misinforma
tion about the so-called peroxide prostitute was, and still is, dished out by the bucketload.I would like to respectfully ask all you 4 people who have taken time to comment about my petition, whether you have read anything about my findings in the national press. The answer will be a resounding 'NO'. Perhaps you need to ask yourselves why.Thank you for taking time to comment. Monica Weller

FH, Amersham says...
9:52pm Thu 5 Jun 08

It's not a question of whether the research is valid and she may have been innocent.

Slacker's question is still valid. What is the point (other than intellectual curiosity) in using time and money to do anything when she's long dead? If you're worried about miscarraiges of justice, campaign for those who are still living and suffering, both in the country and abroad.

monica weller, leatherhead says...
11:18pm Thu 5 Jun 08

What an odd world we live in FH of Amersham. "What is the point other than intellectual curiosity?"You certainly don't know me!I am not an intellectual.The'poi
nt'is, Ruth Ellis may have died 53 years ago but the miscarriage of justice that surrounded her then is here now. It represents the very worst about the society we live in. I say we cannot as humans sit back and be content to say it happened years ago, therefore it is not relevant today. Justice, in my opinion, should form the crux of the society we live in.Unless we all know the difference between justice and injustice how can we possibly set an example to our young people? Who do they look up to as role models if the difficult, un-pc bits are swept under the carpet?In order to know where we are going we need to know where we have come from. Finding the truth for Ruth Ellis's sister Muriel has been my No 1 goal for the last five years. For 53 years successive governments have said Ruth Ellis was guilty. And it was an open and shut case of cold-blooded murder. With my thorough research I have exploded that myth.Ruth Ellis was hanged for a crime she did not commit.She admitted killing Blakely out of misplaced loyalty.I will continue to fight for Ruth Ellis and for a just society.Thank you for your interest.Monica Weller

wayne, wycombe says...
9:43am Fri 6 Jun 08

Monica, you put your points across very rationally and while your points might well be applicable of today, I don't believe one can attribute standards of today, with that of 50 years ago, if we did, where does it stop? People used to get hanged for stealing a loaf of bread, do they not also deserve a pardon because the death penalty no longer applies to that crime?

There is no doubt that Ruth Ellis pulled the trigger, the only concern was that she was aided and abetted by her ex lover who provided the revolver, the person she 'lied' for,this might well have implicated him in the murder but that said, the murder was clearly premeditated and as such, justice in my opinion was served.

One thing I will say having studied Albert Pierrepoint, Ruth Ellis went to her death bravely and so moved Albert Pierrepoint, that he attended her Grave and wrote on a number of occasions to Ruth's sister; it was not however, the reason why he resigned as Chief Executioner.

monica weller, leatherhead says...
10:35am Fri 6 Jun 08

Hi Wayne - thank you for your reasoned message.

My Petition is based on up-to-date and accurate findings which supersede previous authors' and lawyers'research -hence my Petition.

53 years ago Ruth Ellis was hanged for a crime she did not commit. She may have looked as if she was shooting Blakely - but she did not kill him. It would have been physically impossible and with no firearms training for her to have shot 3 out of 4 rounds of ammunition from a Smith and Wesson revolver (not an automatic gun as previously thought)accurately, on target, from a distance, and in the dark.Only one was shot at point blank range - less than 3" from the body. What is more Ruth's light coloured suit that she wore to apparently shoot Blakely in was spotless in the Hampstead Police cell - not a drop of blood or blob of grease from the gun.Yet there were pools and splashes of blood at the scene of the crime. I would respectfully say that your words 'there is no doubt that Ruth Ellis pulled the trigger' are not applicable.

Standards? What standards? The true story about Ruth Ellis has been covered up for too long.

Just because 53 years has gone by it does not mean that we should stop striving for the truth.

Albert Pierrepoint did indeed write to Muriel Jakubait. I have read every letter. He or his agent pulled a great publicity stunt at Ruth's grave which unfortunately dragged Muriel into the macabre scene. Please read RUTH ELLIS MY SISTER'S SECRET LIFE of which I am the co-author, if you want to hear what really happened regarding Pierrepoint's visit to Ruth's grave.

Thank you for your interest. Monica Weller

FH, Amersham says...
4:47pm Fri 6 Jun 08

If an innocent person pleads guilty for any reason other than police bullying, that's sad, but not necessarily a miscarriage of justice.

And whilst I understand the interest and importance of exposing injustice, I still don't see the point in petitioning for a pardon for someone who is long dead and when most of the people involved in the case are also dead.

If your research has unearthed wrong practices that are still happening, then apply that knowledge to current cases and petition for retrials of those you believe are alive and wrongly imprisoned, ie who can benefit from a campaign.

wayne, wycombe says...
5:28pm Fri 6 Jun 08

Sorry, you've lost me now, how does not having firearms training but pointing and shooting a revolver at a person with live rounds justify a Pardon for murder?

I'm not sure if you are aware but the law at the time required that one only had to be an accessory or an accomplice to a murder in order to receive the death sentence Derek Bentley being one of the more widely known Unfortunately. Countless others etc have also received the death penalty merely by being present at the time of the murder, the end result would still mean that Ruth would have received the death penalty regardless of who pulled the trigger, she would have been found guilty of murder and have received the just sentence of the time.


I am convinced that Ruth Ellis should not be pardoned,I am interested however, why Pierrepoint did what he did, that I will be sure to look into further. Cheers

monica weller, leatherhead says...
6:36pm Fri 6 Jun 08

FH - you are of course entitled to your opinion. And I don't agree with.Nor would I dare suggest what you should or should not be doing to promote justice. We shall have to agree to differ.I am not in a position, on this message board,to spell out everything I have found about the case in graphic detail. Thank you for your interest.Monica Weller

Wayne - thank you for your message. Ruth Ellis would not have had the physical strength to shoot a .38 Smith and Wesson gun of the type retrieved at the scene of the crime, once, let alone 6 times.Speak to any firearms expert about that particular gun and I think you will find they will agree with me.

145 women were sentenced to death in the 20th century. 14 were actually executed, the remainder received a reprieve.

Ruth Ellis was not properly represented at her trial.

The Director of the Metropolitan Police Laboratory at New Scotland Yard was not asked to repeat at the Old Bailey trial, crucial evidence about the gun which conveniently broke during testing so ballistics could not be properly carried out. Nor was he asked to repeat information about the trigger pull of 10lbs which required definite and deliberate muscular effort. Nor was he asked to repeat clearly that the trigger of the gun needed to be cocked 6 times. In other words this gun needed a 2-handed operation. Ruth's left hand was gnarled as a result of contracting rheumatic fever as a teenager which had destroyed bone around her left hand finger joints.

All this information has been secreted in closed files for nearly 50 years. Is that justice?

Ruth Ellis may have admitted that she shot Blakely. Have you never heard that people lie, Wayne?

Ruth's defence counsel did nothing to help her.

But you have to look at what was going on at the time. Ruth Ellis was portrayed wrongly in the press as a common tart, therefore she was expendable.

Despite the fact she pleaded not guilty, she had already been found guilty by the press before she set foot in the Old Bailey.

There is much more to the story than you and most of the UK population realise.

But I have not had the luxury of 'playing on a level playing field'in the press.

Thank you for your interest. We will have to agree to differ. Monica Weller

wayne, wycombe says...
8:57pm Sat 7 Jun 08

Not sure where my post went from last night, probably the bucks 'free'press censorship stasi again.

Anyway, a .38 can be cocked and fired with one hand, there are multiple links on youtube of children firing them. The 10lb trigger pull, is if you don't **** the hammer and instead use the trigger alone, the .38 is a double action revolver.

I'm afraid, that having fire many types of firearm myself, I disagree that Ruth Ellis could not have fired this weapon in the manner described.

That said, I do bid you good luck with your quest, at lest you are doing rather bleating from the comfort of an armchair. You have my admiration for that.

wayne, wycombe says...
8:59pm Sat 7 Jun 08

my god! they even censor c o c k as in c o c k the hammer. This is not a free press, it's shambolic.

monica weller, leatherhead says...
11:25pm Sat 7 Jun 08

Wayne,
Having consulted current and senior ex-police officers over the last 5 years, firearms experts and 2nd World War service personnel, all of whom have used this weapon, the consensus of opinion is that it was an extremely difficult gun to operate.Some said it scared the daylights out of them. The recoil alone knocked them backwards in many cases.Many of those people have signed my petition. A police officer who attended our book signing admitted that he couldn't operate this particular gun.

I give talks on the subject of this miscarriage of justice and am often approached by members of the public who belonged to shooting clubs (from novices to experts) and service personnel, all of whom used this type of S + W and want to share their experiences with me. All agreed with my findings.

I have handled the gun at the Crime Museum, New Scotland Yard. I couldn't even get my finger round the trigger and I have big hands. Ruth Ellis had tiny hands, one gnarled with bone destroyed around the finger joints.

Mr Nickolls,Director of the Metropolitan Police Laboratory in 1955 stated clearly in his police report, and at the magistrates court that the gun with its 10lb pull required a 'definte and deliberate muscular effort'. He also stated that the gun broke during testing. Therefore ballistics could not be carried out on it.

He was not asked to repeat any of this crucial evidence at the Old Bailey trial.

This information, and much more, has been locked away for nearly 50 years in closed files.Only now can we start to see what was going on.

Ruth Ellis was not properly represented at her trial.She may have admitted to shooting Blakely but she pleaded not-guilty. She was entitled to a proper defence.

For political reasons Ruth Ellis had to be found guilty.

There is a lot more to the Ruth Ellis story than anyone realises.

Ruth Ellis lied in court.It has taken nearly 50 years to find that out because all the documentation has been locked away from public scrutiny. That is immoral.

People say all this happened 50 years ago, who cares?

I care. There has been a cover up. Ruth Ellis was murdered by the state.

Thank you for your time. We must agree to differ. Alternatively I look forward to seeing your signature on the Petition.
Monica Weller

wayne, wycombe says...
1:43pm Sun 8 Jun 08

You can quote every and any expert you wish, it doesn't change the fact that a firearm in anyones hands can be deadly, irrespective of who is using it, and even to the person using it. Perphaps you might care to explain why various witness statements read in Court showed that Ruth Ellis shot the very relvolver by means of target practise.

If Ruth Ellis lied in Court and by so doing, brought about her own demise,then how on earth can you claim that the state 'murdered' her? the evidence thus far does not warrant a Pardon. Good luck with it, but i won't be signing the petition, sorry.

monica weller, leatherhead says...
5:34pm Sun 8 Jun 08

Wayne
I think we'll leave it there.You are mistaken about the statement read in Court. Mrs Kensington Yule was the only 'witness' called to the Old Bailey. She knew nothing of, and didn't state anything about any target practice. I'm not sure where you've acquired that information but it isn't correct, sorry.

I will not respond to your 2nd paragraph on this comment page.Nothing in the case is what it seemed.

Thank you for your interest.

Monica Weller

Blueberry, S Bucks says...
6:15pm Mon 9 Jun 08

I still don't understand why the governement would want to kill her, even if she was "a common tart, therefore she was expendable".

And if they thought she was a mere tart, she'd be too unimportant for the state to bother with.

Even if her portrayal in the press was unfair, she's not the first or last defendant in that position.

monica weller, leatherhead says...
12:14am Tue 10 Jun 08

Blueberry - I cannot go into the type of detail that you are looking for, on this message board. If you really are interested in the truth about the Ruth Ellis case, and in my new findings, may I suggest you read our book 'RUTH ELLIS, MY SISTER'S SECRET LIFE.'Alternatively, or as well as, you could read my Blog online which is called 'Searching for the Truth about Ruth Ellis.'You should find some answers. Thank You. Monica Weller

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Links


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »