Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting bfp news to 80360 or email »
12:48pm Thursday 17th July 2008
CRUCIAL exam papers for 11-year-olds have not been marked properly, Buckinghamshire's top education boss has claimed.
There had been "widespread mis-marking" for key stage 2 English tests said Marion Clayton, cabinet member for achievement and learning at Buckinghamshire County Council.
The failures - which have hit headlines nationwide - risked children being told their results were not as good as previously thought, she said.
Pupils also take the exams in maths and science.
Key Stage 2 results - for children in the last year of primary school - were released on Tuesday, a week late.
Many heads believe the "subjective" nature of English has led to poor marking.
The council said 33 out of 126 primaries had received incomplete results and "many other schools are asking for remarks of the papers".
Mrs Clayton said: "We are being told of widespread mis-marking, sometimes it's too lenient and sometimes too harsh. There is little consistency of marking and no parity.
"And it gets worse - some schools still have missing papers.
"We've learned that an entire batch of papers from two schools turned up in completely random schools in other parts of the country.
"Another school has had papers returned with pupils with names starting with the letters A-G missing."
Mrs Clayton, who declined to name these schools, called the situation a "disgrace" that will "cause untold and unnecessary concern to parents, pupils and schools".
She said: "What will it do to children's confidence if they are marked down?"
Rosemary Saunders, headteacher at Downley Primary School, said: "We will certainly be returning some of the papers because we don't think that certain areas have been marked as accurately as they could.
"We will have to go through the rest with a fine tooth comb to see that the scores are what they should have been."
But Graham Kilner, head at High Wycombe's Highworth Combined School, said while the delay was "very regrettable" it had no issues with the marking.
Key stage 3 results, for 14-year-olds, were due last week but are now expected tomorrow. These are needed to put children into sets and inform league tables.
Beaconsfield School head Alex Russell said: "We are obviously very concerned about the quality of the marking.
"We will be checking all the papers that come back to make sure they are accurately marked as they should have been."
Dr Mark Fenton, head at Dr Challoner's Grammar School in Amersham, said: "I think that debacle is an accurate description - clearly it's not a very satisfactory situation."
SBJones, Wycombe says...
1:47pm Thu 17 Jul 08
Red Fred, HW says...
2:14pm Thu 17 Jul 08
Observer, of Education says...
7:36pm Thu 17 Jul 08
moominmama, says...
8:32pm Thu 17 Jul 08
Observer wrote:I totally agree, it's not too difficult to be a top school when you have creamed off the those most able to pass the test. We should give children a level playing field, to lots of parents, grammer school is just a status symbol, and it is mostly children who have the benefit of wealth who make it into grammers. AND isn't single sex education (exception Borlase) rather 1950's ? There is more to education than academic results!
Another reason to get rid of the 11 plus.
Abolish the selective school system in Bucks and there would be less problems of this nature.
gurney, high wycombe says...
10:32pm Thu 17 Jul 08
Blueberry, S Bucks says...
11:19pm Thu 17 Jul 08
Another reason to get rid of the 11 plus.Huh? The SATs problems are national - nothing to do with 11+. By all means debate Bucks selection procedures, but it's not relevant to this story.
deecee, high wycombe says...
7:59am Fri 18 Jul 08
Steve, Totteridge Hill says...
8:52am Fri 18 Jul 08
Blueberry wrote:Well spotted Blueberry...
Another reason to get rid of the 11 plus.Huh? The SATs problems are national - nothing to do with 11+. By all means debate Bucks selection procedures, but it's not relevant to this story.
Red Fred, HW says...
10:05am Fri 18 Jul 08
Red Fred, HW says...
10:07am Fri 18 Jul 08
Blueberry, S Bucks says...
1:21pm Fri 18 Jul 08
Why aren't they marked by us in the UK?They are marked (or not) in the UK. But it's a US company that is in charge of organising, recruiting etc. Interestingly on the radio today, US educationalists were being interviewed about bad experiences with the company.
Blueberry, S Bucks says...
2:21pm Fri 18 Jul 08
Red Fred, HW says...
2:32pm Fri 18 Jul 08
shylock, Terriers says...
6:42pm Sat 19 Jul 08
Blueberry wrote:But a load of the papers turned up in the US!
Why aren't they marked by us in the UK?They are marked (or not) in the UK. But it's a US company that is in charge of organising, recruiting etc. Interestingly on the radio today, US educationalists were being interviewed about bad experiences with the company.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find a job in High Wycombe and all around Buckinghamshire.
Search Now »
Make a date in High Wycombe and Buckinghamshire now!
Search Now »
Search for properties all over High Wycombe and across the UK.
Search Now »
Find used vehicles for sale in High Wycombe and all over Buckinghamshire
Search Now »
Catflap, work says...
1:44pm Thu 17 Jul 08