News RSS Feed


News index forum banner.

Air park campaigners welcome stadium proposal

6:29pm Monday 28th July 2008

comment Comments (61)   Have your say »


RESIDENTS have welcomed plans for a new sports stadium - if it means the end for Wycombe Air Park.

Wycombe District Council announced last week that the site in Booker, Marlow, is being considered as a location for a replacement stadium for Adams Park where Wycombe Wanderers and Wasps play.

Householders who live under flight paths from the site are aggrieved at increasingly 'noisy' aircraft.

Lane End resident Susan Pratt, spokeswoman for Wycombe Air Park Action Group, said: "It could be ideally located. I hope that it would mean an end to the air park in favour of a sports village and other facilities that would benefit the whole community."

She said the stadium proposal would now be at the centre of the group's campaign for change:"We'll do anything we can to support Wycombe District Council to find an alternative to the site."

Peter Jennings, of Finings Road, Lane End said: " As far as I'm concerned I would sooner have a football club than an air park. I don't think the football would be disruptive, it's only every two weeks."

Richard Wetenhall, 46, of Church Road, Lane End, said: "If both are located there then there will be even more congestion and I would worry about road access.

"However, if some kind of sensible, balanced solution could be found it has to be a good overall for Wycombe."

WDC leader Lesley Clarke said the council was unable to give say at this stage whether the move would spell the end for the Air Park.

WDC Spokeswoman Becky Wotherspoon said: "London Wasps, Wycombe Wanderers and Wycombe District Council have agreed to work together on a six-month feasibility study of the Air Park site.

"This study will involve looking at the practicalities of continued Air Park operations alongside a new stadium, access issues and how any scheme could be funded.

She added: "We would like to stress that we are at a very early stage in this process and our first step will be to carry out a feasibility study of the site."

There will be a budget of £250,000 for the first stage of the project.

Tim Orchard, managing director of the air park, said he knew no more about the proposal than what was in the council's statement.

Fans of the two teams have reacted positively to the suggested location.

Wanderers supporter Richard Vere, 21, an Essex University student from Marlow said: " I think it's good to move away from Adams Park because parking is a nightmare, especially when the weather is bad.

"The air park has got better access roads and is closer to the motorway."

Wycombe Wanderers Supporters Trust said it did not want to comment until more details were released.

Wasps season-ticket holder David White said: "It's good news. Clearly, Wasps are the champion team of Europe and it's ridiculous they are playing at a stadium with such a small capacity - it's simple economics."


Your Say YourBucks Free Press

Ivor, says...
7:01pm Mon 28 Jul 08

Looks like the future of the Air Park is in doubt then.

It will be a shame to see it go but the panes have caused such a noise nuisance over the years.

Read my latest blog to find out what happened on my recent trip to the Air Park. Click on the “Opinion” link on the menu on the left then click on “Readers Blogs”.

wayne, wycombe says...
7:01pm Mon 28 Jul 08

More sloppy 'journalism', when you state 'residents', please be more concise, I am a local resident and I am in favour of keeping the airfield, as are most of the people I speak with. Pratt is but one person with a large gob.

Ivor, says...
7:07pm Mon 28 Jul 08

When the Air Park is closed how about building a motor racing circuit on the site? There’s plenty of land there....

Read my latest blog to find out what happened on my recent rip to the Air Park. Click on the “Opinion” link on the menu on the left then click on “Readers Blogs”.

George - Wycombe, says...
8:18pm Mon 28 Jul 08

Keep Wycombe Air Park GREEN - There are plenty of green spaces near Lane End for houses.

George - Wycombe, says...
8:23pm Mon 28 Jul 08

Football and Rugby would mean 3 or 4 games a fortnight plus other function, that AND retaining the Air Park is a right winner for the action group.

Spitfire, High Wycombe says...
8:27pm Mon 28 Jul 08

George - Wycombe wrote:
Football and Rugby would mean 3 or 4 games a fortnight plus other function, that AND retaining the Air Park is a right winner for the action group.
Oh I do so hope that happens.

Plus ça change..., Flightpathcombe says...
8:34pm Mon 28 Jul 08

In the name of fairness, the posted messages - 50+ - after your earlier article on this matter a few days ago seemed to tell a different story, with one 'noisy' exception...

Most also seemed pro finding a better home for the soccer and rugger teams, some at the park, some nearer to the Handy Cross area.

I too am not sure what your first bold, capitalised word 'RESIDENTS' actually means, in terms of percentage.

AJHW, High Wycombe says...
9:47pm Mon 28 Jul 08

I used to live a mile from Leyton Orient's ground and could hear the crowds as if they were a few roads away. Not being a killjoy it didn't really bother me but having also lived under a pleasure airfield flight path I know which one I'd prefer to listen to on a sunday afternoon - planes every time.

odbyt, High Wycombe says...
10:10pm Mon 28 Jul 08

Luckily for Lane End resident Susan Pratt, the moving of the sports ground from Sands to Booker airfield will have no negative affect for her. She will not see an increase in Cars, buses and pedestrians in their droves. She will not be blocked in her home by eager fans desperate to park as close to the ground on match day as possible.

If these plans get the go ahead I feel for the people that live in Claymoor and Clayhill, Booker common and Holmers Farm. These are the local residents that should be consulted more on these plans and not those that live in Lane End and Frieth etc.

Leave the airfield alone. It has been there for 70 years and has been an asset to the town and stops civil jets flying at low level over the town causing more noise pollution than you can imagine.

Ivor, says...
10:25pm Mon 28 Jul 08

odbyt, High Wycombe on 10:10pm:
Leave the airfield alone. It has been there for 70 years and has been an asset to the town and stops civil jets flying at low level over the town causing more noise pollution than you can imagine.
After careful thought on the subject I am beginning to agree with you.

Spitfire, High Wycombe says...
11:06pm Mon 28 Jul 08

Ivor wrote:
odbyt, High Wycombe on 10:10pm:
Leave the airfield alone. It has been there for 70 years and has been an asset to the town and stops civil jets flying at low level over the town causing more noise pollution than you can imagine.
After careful thought on the subject I am beginning to agree with you.
Careful thought?! This can't be an authentic Ivor post.

Ivor, says...
11:21pm Mon 28 Jul 08

Spitfire wrote:
Ivor wrote:
odbyt, High Wycombe on 10:10pm: Leave the airfield alone. It has been there for 70 years and has been an asset to the town and stops civil jets flying at low level over the town causing more noise pollution than you can imagine.
After careful thought on the subject I am beginning to agree with you.
Careful thought?! This can't be an authentic Ivor post.
I can confirm this is a genuine post and I am beginning to think the aerodrome (no matter how much aggravation it has caused me) should stay as it does serve a useful purpose as odbyt has pointed out.

I shall see how things develop and may even start a campaign to save the aerodrome.

Spitfire, High Wycombe says...
11:28pm Mon 28 Jul 08

The purpose being nothing to do with the people who enjoy using the airfield every day but that now you think with the airfield gone you might hear more jetliners?

You are an **** and it baffles me why you have a voice on this allegedly serious newspaper website.

Ivor, says...
11:34pm Mon 28 Jul 08

No, no you have got it all wrong. After thinking carefully about my visit to the aerodrome I can see exactly how much the people who fly the planes appreciate the place. Those who run and use the airfield are obviously taking great pride in what they do so they must be enjoying it. Who am I to deprive them of their pleasure?

You may be lucky that I do have a blog on this site after all if the airfield is under threat surely every little bit of support that can be mustered will be needed to save it?

Spitfire, High Wycombe says...
11:36pm Mon 28 Jul 08

The 4* term above was in fact a 3 letter word often used to describe a donkey. The censorship has come as somewhat of a surprise.

Franky, High Wycombe says...
11:49pm Mon 28 Jul 08

Forget everything else. Since when has Booker been in Marlow? It's actually further away from Marlow than High Wycombe town centre..... Very strange!!

smokey, high wycombe says...
7:03am Tue 29 Jul 08

Ivor wrote:
Spitfire wrote:
Ivor wrote:
odbyt, High Wycombe on 10:10pm: Leave the airfield alone. It has been there for 70 years and has been an asset to the town and stops civil jets flying at low level over the town causing more noise pollution than you can imagine.
After careful thought on the subject I am beginning to agree with you.
Careful thought?! This can't be an authentic Ivor post.
I can confirm this is a genuine post and I am beginning to think the aerodrome (no matter how much aggravation it has caused me) should stay as it does serve a useful purpose as odbyt has pointed out. I shall see how things develop and may even start a campaign to save the aerodrome.
YOU start a campaign!!
Don't make me laugh. You are a coward that hides behind his keyboard and the only reason that you have backed down on this one is cos you know that you have made a prat of yourself and you are wrong.

Merge in Turn, says...
9:18am Tue 29 Jul 08

Plenty of empty land between HX and Marlow. The fact its on a slope didn't stop them at Loakes Park nor Adams Park.

yabbadabbadoo, wooburn green says...
9:20am Tue 29 Jul 08

well my parents live near the wycombe wanderers ground now-and when you are visiting it's a bloody nightmare on match days cos of the traffic (some people will park anywhere and block anything!!) the crowds walking to and from the ground, etc etc which i'm not complaining about as we are used to planning around it
(tho sometimes we forget and caught up in it!!) but i wander how long it will be before the "anti airfield brigade" will start the "anti stadium protest" when they realise the bloody chaos it causes !

Spitfire, High Wycombe says...
9:33am Tue 29 Jul 08

Some people, and Susan Pratt sounds like a perfect example, have so little going on in their lives they will find anything to complain about.

Sparky, Booker says...
10:25am Tue 29 Jul 08

If only the BFP read the messages here, the headline would have said Residents against stadium plans. Think they are the idiots now!!!

Wycombe Live, Shop, Work, High Wycombe says...
11:10am Tue 29 Jul 08

My family and I live next to the new Cressex Link Road but I am in two minds as to the relocation of what will probably be a larger stadium for both the Wanderers and the Wasps. We get planes flying over and we also have enough traffic as it is but then it makes sense to develop the council owned airfield rather than buying private land between Handy X and Marlow. Those charities that benefit from car parking would also loose out I guess but then the stadium can't stay where it is because there isn't enough room. Whatever we as residents say will be ignored. We were when the linked road went through and I dare say the council will go with the majority as usual.

Wycombe Live, Shop, Work, High Wycombe says...
11:36am Tue 29 Jul 08

Can I also request that they build a dedicated sliproads on and off the M40, in both directions, for the away supporters? Then the local roads would only need to cope with local traffic.

MikeyPikey, High Wycombe says...
11:49am Tue 29 Jul 08

I think the 'residents' that believe a shared football and rugby staduim would cause less disruption than an airfield are wrong, and they may well live to regret it. I would hate to live near a staduim, its not only football and rugby every week -if its a big enough stadium other events (such as music events) will attract huge amounts of people, traffic, noise, littering, light polution etc. They have to pay for the stadium somehow, so no doubt they will encourage the use of it all week long if they can!

Spitfire, High Wycombe says...
12:07pm Tue 29 Jul 08

Wycombe Live, Shop, Work wrote:
Can I also request that they build a dedicated sliproads on and off the M40, in both directions, for the away supporters? Then the local roads would only need to cope with local traffic.
While a nice idea I think the council might want to encourage some away supporters (or far travelling Wasps supporters) to come into Wycombe centre just for a little bit.

acjy1985, high wycombe says...
12:18pm Tue 29 Jul 08

I used to live over a mile away from St. Mary's stadium in Southampton. I know it is bigger than Wycombe's stadium would be but even over the noise of a city I could tell from the cheers who had scored. The air park is an important part of Wycombe/Booker. It has an excellent(if pricey) flying school and being built on a ridge, it is ideal for glider to catch thermals and updrafts. I now live in Cressex near the Empire cinema and although I hear aircraft they are not even slightly irritating. I work directly underneath where the planes tow the gliders and again they are fine. A new stadium being built over the airfield would be a great loss and cause a lot more traffic around the already busy Handy Cross. Weekday evening fixtures would be hell with away supporters arriving in town for 6.30 ready to park and get to the game by 7.45 kick off.

Elmo, High Wycombe says...
12:28pm Tue 29 Jul 08

Spitfire wrote:
Wycombe Live, Shop, Work wrote: Can I also request that they build a dedicated sliproads on and off the M40, in both directions, for the away supporters? Then the local roads would only need to cope with local traffic.
While a nice idea I think the council might want to encourage some away supporters (or far travelling Wasps supporters) to come into Wycombe centre just for a little bit.
Bang on, any developement should also be a boon to other local industries. The rugby runs a free shuttle bus from the station to the ground and a couple of the town centre pubs do get some extra trade on the day.

If Wasps commit to this they will become our team, not just a long term tenant, and the whole town should embrase them as they are one of the most successful European teams since the professional era began. So lets get some hardcore Wycombe based Wasps support going on.

Drinks anyone?

Lib/Lab Watch, Watching Left Wing Nutters says...
12:28pm Tue 29 Jul 08

I thought that 'Mr Pratt' was the spokesperson for this Action group?...

Tharus Bond, Wycombe says...
12:59pm Tue 29 Jul 08

the airpark is only noise to people who actually listen for the noise and number of aircraft taking off from places like this. they obviously people who use that as an excuse to moan about the noise.
I live near the Flackwell Heath football ground and everytime their is a game our road turns into a car park and some nights the bus has trouble getting through!
Their fixtures board says they have ample parking! that is our road.
Maybe wanderers should build it on the training ground instead.

Ivor, says...
2:09pm Tue 29 Jul 08

Lib/Lab Watch wrote:
I thought that 'Mr Pratt' was the spokesperson for this Action group?...
No. “Mr Pratt” is the person from the powers that be who came up with the silly idea that has put the future of the Air Park in jeopardy and is looking at the feasibility of building a stadium for Wycombe Wanderers in Marlow wasting £250,000 in the process!

Have you seen Ivor’s blog today? Click on the “Opinion” link on the menu on the left then click on “Readers Blogs”.

Elmo, High Wycombe says...
2:15pm Tue 29 Jul 08

...and so the u-turn is complete.

Ivor, says...
2:17pm Tue 29 Jul 08

....more of a loop-the-loop!

At least I'm facing in the right direction....

Elmo, High Wycombe says...
2:21pm Tue 29 Jul 08

Are you sure, your first post on the subject, in reply to the story of angry residents being locked out of the meeting, went as follows:

This is outrageous! The planes are nothing but a nuisance and should be stopped.

The Air Park should be closed and the land used for a new football ground or for houses.


Not entirely sure how you expect to gain any additional respect for your opinion after such a dramatic swing in direction. I mean, it's not as if your word carries that much weight around here as it is.

tom, marlow says...
2:24pm Tue 29 Jul 08

Ivor wrote
....and is looking at the feasibility of building a stadium for Wycombe Wanderers in Marlow wasting £250,000 in the process!


Booker is not in Marlow, its best part of 2 miles away. Postcodes are for the convenience of the royal mail delivery system, they were never intended as a basis for making confusing comments about where a foorball ground should or shouldn't be.

We have our own issues about football ground redevelopment.

Ivor, says...
2:28pm Tue 29 Jul 08

I made a mistake as I can now see that the Air Park is actually doing a good job for Wycombe. True the planes do cause a nuisance but not as much nuisance that we may have if they were not there.

I should have known better than to be swallowed in by a proposal from one of the powers that be.

Save the airfield!

Elmo, High Wycombe says...
2:30pm Tue 29 Jul 08

Spin, spin, spin...

...you should've worked for Blair.

wayne, wycombe says...
3:26pm Tue 29 Jul 08

Air law determines that no aircraft may fly within 1500ft of a public gathering, in other words, you be able to have a stadium within the air traffic zone of an active airfield. If the stadium gets the OK, the airfield goes, it's as simple as that.

Incidentally, Land Registry documents show that Susan Pratt has only lived at Spring Coppice (nr Lane End) since 1993, so they knew full well that there was an airfield all but a field away.

wayne, wycombe says...
3:29pm Tue 29 Jul 08

Air law determines that no aircraft may fly within 1500ft of a public gathering, in other words, you be able to have a stadium within the air traffic zone of an active airfield. If the stadium gets the OK, the airfield goes, it's as simple as that.

Incidentally, Land Registry documents show that Susan Pratt has only lived at Spring Coppice (nr Lane End) since 1993, so they knew full well that there was an airfield all but a field away.

Sparky, Booker says...
3:35pm Tue 29 Jul 08

I think the message here is think before you speak Ivor.

Sparky, Booker says...
3:36pm Tue 29 Jul 08

What a Pratt!!!

Elmo, High Wycombe says...
3:41pm Tue 29 Jul 08

FYI, There's someone up there buzzing about right now.

smokey, high wycombe says...
3:50pm Tue 29 Jul 08

Elmo wrote:
...and so the u-turn is complete.
which just goes to show what a complete numpty he is. He just likes to argue for arguement sake and wind people up.

Well done Mr Cohen - your baa lamb is doing a grand job.

Wycombe Live, Shop, Work, High Wycombe says...
3:57pm Tue 29 Jul 08

The Booker Gliding Club quotes Marlow in their address. Just noticed it on their website:
Wycombe Air Park, Marlow, Buckinghamshire, SL7 3DP

manuiabeach, High Wycombe says...
4:53pm Tue 29 Jul 08

Do Wycombe ratepayers want to pay for another 6 month feasability study, since they have been contributing for so many years to the development, expansion and control of Adams Park partially for a non-resident sports team????
Ask them.
In the interest of freedom of information, please cost!

acjy1985, high wycombe says...
4:57pm Tue 29 Jul 08

I think the planes "buzzing" around at the moment are the Red Bull Air race planes. The race is being held in central London. This surely must be bringing a bit of cash to Booker Air Field. They are great to watch as they do a lot of aerobatics. They are a bt noisier than the usual aircraft but at once a year they are excellent to have here.

Elmo, High Wycombe says...
5:03pm Tue 29 Jul 08

Great view from my office window.

mike h, cressex says...
5:12pm Tue 29 Jul 08

the sooner the planes stop flying over my house the better.If we can give a community stadium to the area & the Wanderers & Wasps both have the much larger ground to increase ther turn over to buy better playes.It would appear at last Wycombe district council are moving to keep Wasps in town good on them.

Elmo, High Wycombe says...
5:13pm Tue 29 Jul 08

manuiabeach wrote:
Do Wycombe ratepayers want to pay for another 6 month feasability study, since they have been contributing for so many years to the development, expansion and control of Adams Park partially for a non-resident sports team???? Ask them. In the interest of freedom of information, please cost!
The only bit of development needed to bring Adams Park up to snuff for the Rugby was the addition of plastic reinforcement to the pitch. I understand this was paid for by QPR (Fulham FC?) as part of the deal to move Wasps out of Loftus Road in the first place. There has been some temporary structures put in place, i.e. the drinks tent, which actually was to save costs, as was the new on-site shop as the Eden development meant the closure of the town centre shop.

As for the non-resident sports team, they have been here for 5 years now, have even moved their reserve team games to Henley (a cracking evening out, btw) and are looking to commit to a permanent move to the new stadium.

I would suggest that they should soon no longer be seen as non-resident, rather an integral and very successful part of this town.

matthewjohn, highwycombe says...
9:43pm Tue 29 Jul 08

what will local residents complain of then. noisy crowds and the refs whistle!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!
quote
quote

matthewjohn, highwycombe says...
9:43pm Tue 29 Jul 08

what will local residents complain of then. noisy crowds and the refs whistle!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!
quote
quote

mr blobbly, says...
8:41pm Thu 31 Jul 08

Let's have the stadium, then a retail park, then more council houses.. Oh wait, we don't have any more petrol and can't afford anything now anyway.

wayne, wycombe says...
11:43pm Thu 31 Jul 08

ah, but we need 250 more houses to pay for this fruitless study. Why WE, are paying, for what amounts to a commercial enterprise is anybody's guess; one can only assume it is for the vanity of a few Councillors who want this Stadium to be their baby and so that their legacies are diverted from the monster that is Eden, to one they believe, is the more poplular.

sr, says...
12:12pm Fri 1 Aug 08

Maybe time is flying by as I get older, but it seems like Adams Park isnt old enough to be 'out of date' - the noise, parking hassle and noise disruption caused by football crowds, cheering and chanting will be far worse and more often than a few gliders and helicopters!! Hope the miserable moaners get what they ask for so they can, like Ivor, think a little harder before shouting out the need for change. Ha ha.

redkite, Newmer Common says...
4:48pm Fri 1 Aug 08

Once again, every single one of you are missing the point.
The Company which runs Wycombe Air Park pays a peppercorn rent of less than £45,000 per annum. This for a site that is potentially worth in the order of £200,000,000. Yes £200 million. Whether you live near the air park or not, Whether you love the aircraft or not, you the rate payer are currently subsidising the relatively small amount of people who fly at the air park, and most of them are from out of town.
I for one do not like subsidising these people. Either the air park pay the going rate for such a sight or the council should find someone else who is willing to pay.
The figure should be considerable more than it currently is.
The council need to have an independent survey done at the air park to acertain its market value. The operater of the air park should then pay this figure or get out and let someone else who is willing to pay, move in. I think you will find that the current operater is unwilling to pay a figure much more than the current fiure of £45,000 per annum. I think if you ask, Wasps would be willing to pay a figure more in keeping with the value of the site.
Its not about Planes, it's not about Rugby, it's about Money and who is willing to pay the market value.

wayne, wycombe says...
12:52am Sat 2 Aug 08

We are not missing the point you patronising fool. YOU! have not considered that not every activity is about money. Taxpayers subsidise Buses and the miniority that use them, Taxpayers subsidise parks, sports facilities, London WASPS etc etc, are we going to be like the US and put a price on everthing? I would pay a premium on the air park if it means keeping it green and not concreting over it.

You also misrepresent the facts, the £45000 you mention is a rent,you have conveniently not incorporated the lease amount into your vastly inflated figures.

if you don't like the noise, why the hell did you move here? I wonder whether we could start a campaign against the nuisance neighbours who move into the area, only then to try and change peoples' way of life because it does not fit in with their own.

If you don't like it, there's two words that would be appropriate to use but which are likely to be filtered.

Lastly, please enlighten us how you quantify your statement that most who use the airfield are from outside the area?

redkite, Newmer Common says...
11:30am Sat 2 Aug 08

Wayne you are not in touch with the facts.
AAA Ltd the Lessee of the Council Ground on which ther airpark stands pays a total figure for the site to WDC of less than £45,000 per annum.
If you do not believe me,ask the council and they will tell you. I can assure you that the figure is correct.I got it from the coucil under thge Freedom of Information Act.
You must be the only rate payer prepaired to subsidise the activities at Booker.


wayne, wycombe says...
2:33pm Sat 2 Aug 08

You have ignored answering my points in paragraph 1 of the previous post, why don't you answer them?

Please reconcile the following question with a YES or NO answer, does the LESSEE pay for using the airfield? simple question that a 5 year old could answer.

Lastly,your argument is a biased generalisation that attempts to mask your true agenda of seeing the airfield close.

As for I "must be the only 'rate payer',prepaired to subsidise the activities at Booker", again, you make a hasty generalisation and an appeal to belief by loading a statement with YOUR keyword, 'subsidise'; it is rather mischievous but telling as to why you do this.

Maybe I am subsidising the oxygen with which you breath by planting trees in my Garden, you are likely to be subsidised by a high rate taxpayer who pays more Council tax than you do, shall I ask that you be wiped off of the face of the earth as a result? No, like your reasoning, it would be both a ridiculous and fallacious argument.


GJW, High Wycombe says...
9:19am Sun 3 Aug 08

Why are Locals now complaining about aircraft noise? The airfield has been in existence for something like 70 years and so most of the complainants, if not all, have moved into the area knowing that aircraft use the facility. Wycombe Air Park has very strict noise abatement proceedures that pilots have to adhere to, avoiding overflying many of the local villages. Obviously there will still be aircraft noise but the flight training organisations at Wycombe Air Park do their utmost to keep noise to a minimum. Has anyone given a thought to what impact this proposal will have on the flight training organistaions and the people employed by them. Where will they go? There are other aviation related businesses on the site which would also be affected. I fly (not at Booker) and I am also a Wycombe Wanderers supporter but I see this whole scheme as being of benefit only to London Wasps. Wycombe Wanderers are unable to fill the stadium they already have!
What will happen to the Adams Park facility if the proposal goes ahead? Will it be retained for the benefit of the local community or will it be an excuse for an inappropriate development within the Greenbelt?

Any answers from those putting forward these proposals?


wayne, wycombe says...
10:34am Sun 3 Aug 08

Has anyone given a thought to what impact this proposal will have on the flight training organistaions and the people employed by themquote


I guess that's why the Council are spending £250,000 of our money to find out GJW; unfortunately, like the moron who moved next to a pub in Lane End then complains about the noise; the airfield has its own share of people who move nearby, then complain about it.

angie, Booker says...
6:51pm Thu 7 Aug 08

As a resident of Clayhill for the past 15 years I would like to say I DO NOT agree that Wycombe Air Park is the best site for a football stadium, It would totally destroy the peace and quiet for all residents of Clayhill, Claymoor and surrounding areas as we would be inundated with cars trying to find parking spaces on OUR estates, also stangers wondering around both of which would put our homes and children at risk.
all this area is a quiet rural area and should remain so. As for aircraft noise, which I might add is minimal is a damm site better than hundreds of football fans shouting and screaming. it would be nice if the people whose lives are to be disrupted were consulted prior to plans. we already have to contend with horrible smells comeing from recycling centre and noise from heavy lorries going to the tip so what else do we have to put up with!!! people who don't live on the doorstep of the air park should consider how the would feel if this stadium was oppisite their homes, I am sure they would have a different opinion then.
PLEASE LEAVE WYCOMBE AIR PARK AS IT IS AND DONT DESTROY MORE OF WHAT LITTLE COUNTRYSIDE WE HAVE!!!

GJW, High Wycombe says...
9:06am Sun 10 Aug 08

I hope that Wycombe District Council will listen to the views of all the local residents in the vicinity of Wycombe Air Park, not just the ones that have so much time on their hands that they have nothing better to do than complain about aircraft noise. The one self-appointed "spokesperson" who has had recent media attention surely does not speak for the majority of local residents, who I am almost certain would prefer the retention of the airfield as opposed to the proposed new footbal / rugby stadium and the disruption that goes with it. Wycombe District Council - please listen the views of all those affected, not just those that shout loudest!
Money makes the World go round, so it is said, but we are getting into a hopeless situation if money rules the World. Listen to people like Angie who posted the previous comment, she lives close to the airfield and does not have a problem with it as I suspect is the case generally. There are always a very few in every community that take it upon themselves to campaign for change, when the benefit is only to themselves.
I support Angie's comment - PLEASE LEAVE WYCOMBE AIR PARK AS IT IS AND DONT DESTROY MORE OF WHAT LITTLE COUNTRYSIDE WE HAVE!!!

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Links


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »