News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


bux2

Your Area News by you News by email Contact Twitter facebook Blogs Topics Video


Council boss: Holywell Mead, High Wycombe pool issue "shut"


A COUNCIL leader who led the closure of Holywell Mead outdoor swimming pool tonight said the matter is “shut” after being pressed by the opposition.

Conservative councillor Lesley Clarke stepped into a discussion between a finance boss and Liberal Democrat Trevor Snaith after Cllr Snaith raised the pool.

She said: “I think we have already made a decision on Holywell Mead pool.

“We took that decision in February this year. I know it’s hard for you to understand that but the decision has been to made to close it.

“We did not have the money to keep it open. I don’t know how many times I have to say that to yourself and the Bucks Free Press.”

She said: “I hope that that keeps the matter shut.”

At the time of closure the council said the pool was under-used.

Cllr Clarke spoke after Cllr Snaith, a strong opponent of the closure, asked about the council’s future plans for the site.

Cllr Roger Wilson, responsible for finance on the council, said there were not plans on the table to sell the facility.

And he warned the council would have to take some “very hard decisions” in future.

Cllr Clarke said the Government’s grant to the council could be cut by ten per cent and it would be “folly in the extreme” to overspend.

She said: “We are trying desperately to make sure everything works properly. We are trying to keep our frontline services going.”

The meeting was told the council’s investments fell in value from £62.6m at the start of the 2008/09 financial year to £58.8m at the end.

Investments include £2.5m locked in Icelandic bank Glitnir.

The council is also trying to sell nearby Bassetsbury Manor for more than £1m.

Last week TV presenter and Holmer Green resident Fern Britton called the pool closure "short sighted" (see link, below).


Comments(62)

J B Blackett says...
7:08pm Mon 28 Sep 09

What an arrogant undemocratic person !

lidopraiser says...
7:22pm Mon 28 Sep 09

The Council does not know what it is doing. Tony Green said it was 'mothballed' not shut. It made a loss and the local group said they would run it for them. That was not accepted. Then the group offered to raise the deficit for a year so that it could re-open and get back on its feet. Now it is 'shut' as it always is at this time of year. There is no reason at all why it should not 'open' next April with the support of the Friends of the Pool group. I heard somewhere they are having a public meeting on October 13th. It is time that Lesley Clarke and Tony Green recognised that this issue will not go away. Cllr. Snaith is right to keep pressing for solutions and should not be 'shut up' like the pool has been. Critique is the Springboard to success,Trevor. Do ignore them when they go off 'in the Deep End'.

yog says...
7:41pm Mon 28 Sep 09

Yes Lesley but that decision was made without any consultation with local residents. When are you going to ask local residents what they want?

The pool group are willing to work with WDC to secure a viable future for the pool, surely that is in everyones interests?




giant says...
7:53pm Mon 28 Sep 09

And he warned the council would have to take some “very hard decisions” in future.... Well my dear fellow good housekeeping always works.
I propose none of the elected councillors claim expenses for next five years. You guys are in it for public service.
Reduce number of elected officials. Do we really need all of you?
Downsize head count at WDC.
Monitor closely the costs related to tendering.
Reduce community cohesion programmes. Stop wasting money on the Muslim community. Muslims arrived in Wycombe decades ago not last year or year before that. Should the Muslim community need cohesion ask for collection amongst the well of in the community (they do it every Friday in the mosque), ask Muslims businesses to fund cohesion.
The most important money saving measure could be Wycombe becoming a unitary authority. To hell with Marlow and rural Buckinghamshire. I want my taxes spent on facilities in this town.

giant says...
7:53pm Mon 28 Sep 09

And he warned the council would have to take some “very hard decisions” in future.... Well my dear fellow good housekeeping always works.
I propose none of the elected councillors claim expenses for next five years. You guys are in it for public service.
Reduce number of elected officials. Do we really need all of you?
Downsize head count at WDC.
Monitor closely the costs related to tendering.
Reduce community cohesion programmes. Stop wasting money on the Muslim community. Muslims arrived in Wycombe decades ago not last year or year before that. Should the Muslim community need cohesion ask for collection amongst the well of in the community (they do it every Friday in the mosque), ask Muslims businesses to fund cohesion.
The most important money saving measure could be Wycombe becoming a unitary authority. To hell with Marlow and rural Buckinghamshire. I want my taxes spent on facilities in this town.

Marsh Crusader says...
7:56pm Mon 28 Sep 09

With the closure of the pool and putting Bassetsbury Manor up for sale, denying community groups the chance to run or develop community needs, cutting grants to organisations like Environment centre, Citizens Advice, Race Equality and many more - why don't you Clllr's Clarke & Green erect five barred gated on the London & West Wycombe roads and declare Wycombe closed !!!!!

J B Blackett says...
8:01pm Mon 28 Sep 09

These councillors are totally out of touch with the folk of this town on almost every topic.
.
They are almost beyond description in their self-congratulatory twaddle that issues from their orifices. Playing their silly little political games !
.
It appears that not one of them on our side , I'm afraid. And we are nearly powerless be get rid of them

giant says...
8:04pm Mon 28 Sep 09

Can I propose two term maximum representation at district and county level for all elected officials? For instance Councillor Mahboob Hussain (Bhatti) not only looks like a relic from a bygone but also he has been elected Councillor for far too long and he is not the only one. Two term limit will improve the democratic process and also reduce deadwood and it may, just may stop Muslim community from block-voting candidates every time there is an election.

giant says...
8:05pm Mon 28 Sep 09

bygone era

time to go clarke says...
8:41pm Mon 28 Sep 09

Cuts more cuts and more cuts !!
no public consultation !!
You have loads of money in reserves!!
Time to go Clarke!!

rambler241 says...
9:02pm Mon 28 Sep 09

There's a large building in the town centre that's surplus to requirements - OUR requirements that is. It's filled with people who seem to have no duty of responsibility to anyone but themselves. I vote that it be closed,and its inhabitants moved to a call centre somewhere in the north of Scotland. They'd be about as much use there to the voters and taxpayers of High Wycombe as they are now. The building could be sold, and the cash used for projects that residents actually want, including the refurbishment and reopening of Holywell Mead Pool.

DeepThinker says...
9:12pm Mon 28 Sep 09

Clarke. Up herself or what?

weyfarer says...
9:16pm Mon 28 Sep 09

I will say this till I am blue in the face- you people in Wycombe voted these cllrs in one way or another. I am afraid Wycombe reaps only what its people sow.
Wycombe needs a town council- look at other examples such as Risborough where the council acting for the poeple is stepping in to try and save the British Legion and Molins Sports Club. The people will ultimately fund this through the local rates but democracy is alive and well in at least one corner of Wycombe District.
Holywell could be saved by Wycombe Town Council (if such a body existed).

J B Blackett says...
9:50pm Mon 28 Sep 09

^^ You are correct weyfayer of Risboro.
.
These people represent nobody but themselves and their 'little' pals and are wrecking Wycombe, its heritage , culture and history in pursuit of a weird alien incomprehensible game of their own.
.
They must be brought to book and that will only happen when we have a Town Council that defends Wycombe form malicious attacks by self-interest groups.

chris740 says...
9:50pm Mon 28 Sep 09

hey clarke. its time you jumped in the deep end of our disused pool,

you are so blind, you cant see what you are doing to the town

demoness says...
3:38am Tue 29 Sep 09

Could she be more out of touch with local opinion if she tried?
Odious woman.
Selling off the family china - that pool has been earmarked for a developer - put money on it!

Neil Bailey Save Holywell Mead Pool says...
8:03am Tue 29 Sep 09

Dear Lesley

Our group has striven on a number of occasions to connect with the council and open a two way financial and operational discussion as a community group not as a bidding supplier.

I will re-iterate our previous offer - work with the council and community to re-open the pool - work with the council and community to mitigate sensible risks - create a long term community fund to support the pool for the future for the benefit of all of our community.

Regards

Neil Bailey

Chair - Holywell Mead Pool - Save Our Swim

poolfan#101 says...
8:29am Tue 29 Sep 09

I was under the impression that whichever party was voted in they were there to represent ALL of the people not just those that voted for them.
Is it not this councils duty to do just that and represent us all?
The group who are trying to save this fantastic pool are an asset to our community. They are seeking to save a unique and potentially valuable facility and are trying to do so by mitigating any financial obligation of this council.
If this issue is annoying our esteemed council leader, as it clearly seems to be doing, why not simply let the Pool Group have the lease to the pool and let them turn it around. If it really is as much of a money pit as we are repeatedly told it is then why not just sit back and let the Group fail. Then our council can simply sit back and say "we told you so" and the whole excersise would have cost them nothing!
However allowing the Pool Group the opportunity to fail or (as is more likely) succeed our Council would be allowing some of their voting public the chance to become the sort of community enterprise that this sad and decaying town really needs.

weyfarer says...
9:03am Tue 29 Sep 09

poolfan#101 wrote:
I was under the impression that whichever party was voted in they were there to represent ALL of the people not just those that voted for them. Is it not this councils duty to do just that and represent us all? The group who are trying to save this fantastic pool are an asset to our community. They are seeking to save a unique and potentially valuable facility and are trying to do so by mitigating any financial obligation of this council. If this issue is annoying our esteemed council leader, as it clearly seems to be doing, why not simply let the Pool Group have the lease to the pool and let them turn it around. If it really is as much of a money pit as we are repeatedly told it is then why not just sit back and let the Group fail. Then our council can simply sit back and say "we told you so" and the whole excersise would have cost them nothing! However allowing the Pool Group the opportunity to fail or (as is more likely) succeed our Council would be allowing some of their voting public the chance to become the sort of community enterprise that this sad and decaying town really needs.
Well said poolfan; however if you lived anywhere else in Buckinghamshire your local council would be forced to listen to you, unfortunately Wycombe town is the only unparished part of Bucks leaving you an anomoly without a local council to represent you. if you had a town council they could give the townspeople all the options available (at a cost of course). This is called local democracy.

Plus ça change... says...
9:06am Tue 29 Sep 09

Don't forget the Roman villa...

Just one piece of mosaic, a couple of shards of pottery make a history.

poolfan#101 says...
9:09am Tue 29 Sep 09

Are our Council scared to put this to the public? Are they arfaid that they would have to do a massive U-turn in the face of public opposition to their plan?
I agree with the previous comment that there is some hidden plan for this site. The pool is closed, Bassetbury Manor is up for sale....it will be the closure of the tennis courts next and then what?
I for one do not want to see the area developed, it has a charm that is found nowhere else in this concrete ridden town. I want to be able to swim in the open air and listen to the trees russtle and the birds sing. What Council woldn't want that for their community?

weyfarer says...
9:18am Tue 29 Sep 09

poolfan#101 wrote:
Are our Council scared to put this to the public? Are they arfaid that they would have to do a massive U-turn in the face of public opposition to their plan? I agree with the previous comment that there is some hidden plan for this site. The pool is closed, Bassetbury Manor is up for sale....it will be the closure of the tennis courts next and then what? I for one do not want to see the area developed, it has a charm that is found nowhere else in this concrete ridden town. I want to be able to swim in the open air and listen to the trees russtle and the birds sing. What Council woldn't want that for their community?
What council wouldn't want that for their community? Quite simply one that is made up and run almost entirely by tories that don't live in Wycombe town and simply have little interest outside of their own communities.

yog says...
9:58am Tue 29 Sep 09

However Cllrs Green & Clarke run the council and they are both cllrs from Wycombe town!

weyfarer says...
10:06am Tue 29 Sep 09

That may be so yog, but to run the town they need their cronies from Hazlemere, Marlow etc behind them backing them all the way. And they are more worried about their own electorate's than Wycombe!!

Wycombe Marsh Rebel says...
11:09am Tue 29 Sep 09

Cllr Clarke has stated "We did not have the money to keep it open", yet the pool group are offering the funds to refurbish and open it next year. Cllr Wilson said "there were not plans on the table to sell the facility", so why keep it derelict and unused when a group has offered to get it up and running....possibly making a profit at no cost to the Council. These arguments make no sense to me. This Tory Council is completely out of touch with the people of Wycombe and its a shame we have to wait until 2011 before we can vote Cllr Clarke and her cronies out. Sadly by then we will have no community facilities left in Wycombe.

Farmer Pickles says...
11:17am Tue 29 Sep 09

When they lost all that money in Iceland and were forced to come clean about how much money they had in reserve we were told that they had a duty to invest this money as a contingency for a rainy day.

To then justify closing the pool, selling Bassetsbury Manor and making other efficiency savings based on the current economic downturn makes no sense as we still have a large contingency fund for such circumstances, as it was only a very small proportion of it which was lost in an Icelandic Bank.

Surely during the last decade the district council's investments have been reaping massive returns which could now be used to get us through this downturn without having to raise taxes or make efficiency savings.

If a contingency fund is not actually going to be used when it is needed the only people to benefit from it is the people who are paid to manage it (not always very well in the case of Landsbanki).

demoness says...
11:59am Tue 29 Sep 09

The reason that Ms clarke and her colleagues are ignoring the folk who want to save the pool is because the lib dems are using it as a political tool. Get the lib dems away from it - remove any connection to their site and then lets see what happens.
This is all about politics and these well meaning people are being used as pawns.
Imagine it - they persuade the council to keep the pool open - can't you just see what the Lib dems would make of it from a political point of view? They would use it as a major focus in their campaign.
All the pool is to them,is astick to beat the tories with which to me is just as contemptable as closing the pool is.

time to go clarke says...
12:35pm Tue 29 Sep 09

demoness wrote:
The reason that Ms clarke and her colleagues are ignoring the folk who want to save the pool is because the lib dems are using it as a political tool. Get the lib dems away from it - remove any connection to their site and then lets see what happens. This is all about politics and these well meaning people are being used as pawns. Imagine it - they persuade the council to keep the pool open - can't you just see what the Lib dems would make of it from a political point of view? They would use it as a major focus in their campaign. All the pool is to them,is astick to beat the tories with which to me is just as contemptable as closing the pool is.
Lets remember the Tory's closed the pool !!
There are some Tory's that want to save pool but are afraid to speak out against the Tory line. Ask local Tory councillor their personal position on the pool !!!
Its an issue that WDC mainstream Torys put self interest and cuts first and refuse to accept what local people want.


tom.marlow says...
12:38pm Tue 29 Sep 09

demoness wrote:
The reason that Ms clarke and her colleagues are ignoring the folk who want to save the pool is because the lib dems are using it as a political tool. Get the lib dems away from it - remove any connection to their site and then lets see what happens. This is all about politics and these well meaning people are being used as pawns. Imagine it - they persuade the council to keep the pool open - can't you just see what the Lib dems would make of it from a political point of view? They would use it as a major focus in their campaign. All the pool is to them,is astick to beat the tories with which to me is just as contemptable as closing the pool is.
So they should give up their campaign in order to keep the LibDems out ?
.
What exactly will that acheive?

yog says...
1:03pm Tue 29 Sep 09

If the Conservatives wanted to save the pool they wouldn't have closed it in the first place!!!!
The Lib Dems are the official opposition on the council. Of course they are going to oppose the closure of community facilities!!!!
I cannot believe how some people (well one!) seem to have such difficulty understanding the basic job of an opposition i.e. to hold the ruling party to account.






Save Wycombe says...
3:14pm Tue 29 Sep 09

Surely the real reason the Council don't want to let the Pool Group run the pool is this:
they might just be successful!

yog says...
3:25pm Tue 29 Sep 09

I think you have hit the nail on the head. If the pool group were successful it would show up how badly run it was before hand.
Yet chairman Neil Bailey (above) has again repeated the call for the Council to engage with the group and work together to ensure the pool has a viable future.

There is only so many times you can offer the hand of friendship.


I know the truth says...
3:48pm Tue 29 Sep 09

This is a sad attempt by the liberal democrates to try and get back into power - they don't care about the pool - they only care about power.

demoness says...
3:48pm Tue 29 Sep 09

yog wrote:
If the Conservatives wanted to save the pool they wouldn't have closed it in the first place!!!! The Lib Dems are the official opposition on the council. Of course they are going to oppose the closure of community facilities!!!! I cannot believe how some people (well one!) seem to have such difficulty understanding the basic job of an opposition i.e. to hold the ruling party to account.
Holding the party to account is one thing and yes I agree they should.
BUT using an emotive subject such as the pool is something else.
Oh I know that no one else agrees with me on here but I have as much contempt ( if not more) for the lib dems as I have for any of the parties.
More so for the lib dems because they hide their ambitions "for the good of the community".
Oh and BTW Yog - whats it got to do with you anyway - you live in Brighton?

tom.marlow says...
4:01pm Tue 29 Sep 09

How does your contempt for the Lib Dems compare with your contempt for Marlow? More ? Less? the same ?

yog says...
4:08pm Tue 29 Sep 09

So the Lib Dems can hold the ruling party to account as long as it is not an emotive subject??????

I suggest you go back to stalking Ivor, more your level!


Gordina Brown says...
4:18pm Tue 29 Sep 09

I agree with you demoness, all political parties are the same. The Lib Dems are full of broken promises. Of course the opposition are going to oppose the closure of community facilities....until they get elected and have to do exactly the same thing. Unless the Lib Dems have a secret money pot to keep all these underused community facilities open Yog??? The pool was NOT used and re-opening it under a charity won't make the slightest bit of difference. Its sad, but a fact of life. How many people moaning about its closure actually swam in it???

demoness says...
4:27pm Tue 29 Sep 09

tom.marlow wrote:
How does your contempt for the Lib Dems compare with your contempt for Marlow? More ? Less? the same ?
Tricky one Tom.... I'll get back to you. ;)

demoness says...
4:30pm Tue 29 Sep 09

yog wrote:
So the Lib Dems can hold the ruling party to account as long as it is not an emotive subject?????? I suggest you go back to stalking Ivor, more your level!
Oh Yog - you Bi atch.. lol.
No that's not what I said. The Lib dems set up a website that pool supporters could join . My point is that they should not have done that.
By all means show support BUT do not get directly involved .

OMG - if you think I am stalking Ivor, does that mean you are stalking me stalking Ivor??

*is scared...*

yog says...
4:32pm Tue 29 Sep 09

Interesting that you mention a secret pot of money because there was one!
At the last annual budget setting meeting the Liberal Democrat Councillors proposed using a 'pot of money' that was indeed sat in a bank account doing bugger all.
The Lib Dems proposed using some of this to reopen the pool and to keep the Council tax increase down. Yet Conservative Councillors voted against this measure and instead broke their election promise.

Interesting that despite the Conservatives saying they couldn't use the money guess which pot of money the Conservatives are now dipping into? The very same pot of money!

Gordina Brown says...
5:05pm Tue 29 Sep 09

yog wrote:
Interesting that you mention a secret pot of money because there was one! At the last annual budget setting meeting the Liberal Democrat Councillors proposed using a 'pot of money' that was indeed sat in a bank account doing bugger all. The Lib Dems proposed using some of this to reopen the pool and to keep the Council tax increase down. Yet Conservative Councillors voted against this measure and instead broke their election promise. Interesting that despite the Conservatives saying they couldn't use the money guess which pot of money the Conservatives are now dipping into? The very same pot of money!
"If" this is true Yog, then why is it not front page news??

yog says...
5:19pm Tue 29 Sep 09

Ok fair enough will take up that challenge!

time to go clarke says...
6:16pm Tue 29 Sep 09

yog wrote:
Ok fair enough will take up that challenge!
Come to Full Council meeting on 5th at 6.30pm
Public welcome -- i will be in public gallery

Pool questions will be asked !!!

Hear yet again how Tory's continue to disregard public opinion

bexs60 says...
6:43pm Tue 29 Sep 09

This story makes my blood boil.
I recently visited family in Lincolnshire and discovered that besides having a local open air swimming pool, those under 16 yrs of age and over 60 yrs of age could actually swim FREE OF CHARGE under a new government backed scheme!
On my return to Wycombe I contacted various swimming pools in the area to ask them if they were taking part in this scheme and the nearest ones I could find were Aylesbury and Amersham, so I contacted Wycombe District Council and spoke to the gentleman incharge of sports and entertainment for Wycombe. His response was interesting to say the least.
He said " this is a governement backed scheme for the under 16's and over 60's and while we received a grant from the government for this purpose it was not sufficient money and we couldnt raise the extra money needed to put it in place"
Can you believe that! So not only do they close a pool that everybody is willing to pay to visit but when they are given money by the government to encourage people to swim that wont cost the majority of them anything they do nothing about them because the money was insufficient, bet they didnt hand back the grant they were given towards it though?
What is going on with this Council, they shut down Swimming Pools, refuse to fund government backed projects when they are given part payment anyway and even agree to pay for partial repairs to bridges in bloody Maidenhead which is in Berkshire not Buckinghamshire!
God it makes me spit!

baggs says...
7:03pm Tue 29 Sep 09

why will the council not let the save the pool group do ther thing do they not want to lose face? when the group suceads the council could look good !! dont hold your breath

J B Blackett says...
8:11pm Tue 29 Sep 09

SO TO SUMMARIZE :
.
It would appear from most of the comments above , there would appear to be mainly two distinct opinions about this pool decision by the (our ?) 'councillors' at WDC.
.
1. First option
They are nearly all raving bonkers and are simultaneously inept incompetents that haven't got a clue about anything and are just playing silly petty pathetic political games with public facilities.
.
OR 2.
They are colluding / plotting / conniving together involving a secretive hidden agenda to dispose of a public asset (hidden from the public ) to suit their own party / gang /personal schemes - definitely not in our interests.
.
I know what I think. What do you think ?
. Regards

timmyo says...
9:44pm Tue 29 Sep 09

Shame the Council haven't been getting the proper rent from the Air Park over these years.

If they'd been getting the half a million extra quid a year they should have been, there would have been no need to close the pool.

If they get the rent increase, why don't we ask for it to be used to keep the pool open?

George1 says...
10:27pm Tue 29 Sep 09

"Councillor Clarke is reported as saying that at the time the decision to close Holymead was made, the facility was under used".

IT WAS FEBRUARY 2009 and the pool an OPEN AIR one.

How many times do we have to call for LESLEY CLARKE'S RESIGNATION?

BRITAIN'S RICHEST COUNCIL IS FAILING THOSE OF US PAYING FOR THE TORIES INCOMPETENCE.



TheInsider says...
10:48pm Tue 29 Sep 09

For the past ten years the UK has been booming. Money was plentiful and councils had money to invest in fanciful banks and money making schemes.
Now we are in recession, councils all over the UK are selling off facilities and land which is the property of the residents.
Money "made" during boom times and sitting in reserves should be used to keep these facilities open during the rainy days we are experiencing. Land can be rented, properties rented, and facilities tendered. Closing and selling off the UK's heritage to investors (some of which are investment companies from overseas) is a national disgrace. Huge swathes of London are now owned by overseas companies and heads of state.
There are councils all over the UK, selling off and closing down facilities and using the excuse of the recession to do so.
Once they are gone they never come back. Residents all over the UK must stop this national sell-off and closure scandal which is being carried out by many different parties at local level.

J B Blackett says...
12:18am Wed 30 Sep 09

Why are these people from BRIGHTON (yog , The Insider etc) so interested in WYCOMBE affairs and voicing their opinions on very local matters ?
.
Does anyone out there know ? Is there a prospective LD candidate for WYCOMBE in the offing , who is also currently resident in BRIGHTON ?
.
Just curious that's all !

demoness says...
6:45am Wed 30 Sep 09

J B Blackett wrote:
Why are these people from BRIGHTON (yog , The Insider etc) so interested in WYCOMBE affairs and voicing their opinions on very local matters ? . Does anyone out there know ? Is there a prospective LD candidate for WYCOMBE in the offing , who is also currently resident in BRIGHTON ? . Just curious that's all !
Thank you JB.
I have been villified on here for daring to critisise the lib dem's motives.They like to see themselves as the "fluffy bunny" party who only thinks of the community. I see them as a group of desperate wannabee politicians who will do anything to get into power.
I don't understand why people who live in Brighton are so interested in what goes on in Wycombe - and it has never been explained to me. :(

bexs60 says...
7:25am Wed 30 Sep 09

Ever thought people in Brighton might actually hail from Wycombe and like to keep themselves in the loop?
I spent a few years living elsewhere and kept up to date with daily goings on in Buckinghamshire because it is where I am from and it interests me!
Just a thought ............

weyfarer says...
8:39am Wed 30 Sep 09

I'll say it again shall I; You voted them in, you reap what you sow I am afraid. Vote yourselves a town council and they will be able to bow to public pressure and save the thing. If you lot put as much energy into that as you have writing blogs on here Holywell will be saved.
Looks like an interesting meeting at WDC coming up, how will Clarke & Co dodge this one?

time to go clarke says...
9:15am Wed 30 Sep 09

weyfarer wrote:
I'll say it again shall I; You voted them in, you reap what you sow I am afraid. Vote yourselves a town council and they will be able to bow to public pressure and save the thing. If you lot put as much energy into that as you have writing blogs on here Holywell will be saved. Looks like an interesting meeting at WDC coming up, how will Clarke & Co dodge this one?
Public invited to Full Council on 5th of October at 6.30pm in Council Chamber. Ill be in Public Gallery.
Will be a few pool questions!
Join me and discover the arrogance of the Tory Councillors who wont listen to public opinion

demoness says...
9:33am Wed 30 Sep 09

bexs60 wrote:
Ever thought people in Brighton might actually hail from Wycombe and like to keep themselves in the loop? I spent a few years living elsewhere and kept up to date with daily goings on in Buckinghamshire because it is where I am from and it interests me! Just a thought ............
Fair comment Bex but I think that there is more too it than that. Yog only EVER comments wheh he or she can make a snide remark about the council or big up the lib dems..

TheInsider says...
9:41am Wed 30 Sep 09

I live in Brighton and will answer your question about my interest in the issue. I support all UK sports facilities and health strategies, particularly council and state funded facilities. Sport should be accessible to all irrespective of age, wealth, location etc. As I have stated in my comments, Wycombe, Brighton and dozens of other towns and cities across the country are axing facilities irresepctive of party persuation. I have no political allegiance, I am an ordinary person who loves sport and feels that sport for young people is vital for keeping kids occupied and healthy. I am saddened by the continued pressure on state facilities across the UK. As we all know, there is already a divide in health care provision in the UK (postcode lottery health), the charging of higher education fees is different in England&Wales from Scotland and we also have a situation where some councils have chosen to offer the free swimming scheme and others do not. The same with the free bus pass scheme.
Sport and health provision should not be reliant on your postcode.
Please feel free to Google the King Alfred Leisure Centre, Brighton, to see a similar situation in Brighton, where the only pool/health centre in the city is not being repaired/lost an investor for re-development.
Remember many of Britain's best athletes, Olympians and footballers have started their careers in ordinary council run centres. Once they are lost, they are lost forever.



bexs60 says...
10:37am Wed 30 Sep 09

"we also have a situation where some councils have chosen to offer the free swimming scheme and others do not"

Wycombe were given the funding for the free swimming scheme, but I was informed that the money was insufficient to put the scheme in place, and when I asked if the money had been handed to back to where it came from, the subject was quickly avoided and changed!

J B Blackett says...
2:00pm Wed 30 Sep 09

bexs60 wrote:
Ever thought people in Brighton might actually hail from Wycombe and like to keep themselves in the loop?
I spent a few years living elsewhere and kept up to date with daily goings on in Buckinghamshire because it is where I am from and it interests me!
Just a thought ............
OK bexs60 , I do understand what you are saying and fully concur.
,
And even more - to substantiate what you said , the reason I am curious is because several generations of my family were born and bred in in various parts of Brighton.
.
In fact when my earlier ancestors were there it was not called Brighton. It was initially called Brighthelm (Saxon name) then Brighthelmstone (as on my ancestors birth certificates) and finally Brighton after the Prince Regent made it 'fashionable'.
.
So I was intrigued to know why folk from Brighton were interested in Wycombe affairs , when in my particular case the reverse is true.
.
I have looked into Brighton's history in pursuit of my family's history, but are not totally up-to-date with sports facilities and council affairs (it does have a strong Green Party presence).
.
I also have learned (this surprised me at first) that Brighton has some of the most deprived areas in the whole of England and lots of social problems - the least of these is probably open-air swimming pools, I think.
.
Regards

J B Blackett says...
2:42pm Wed 30 Sep 09

demoness wrote:
bexs60 wrote:
Ever thought people in Brighton might actually hail from Wycombe and like to keep themselves in the loop? I spent a few years living elsewhere and kept up to date with daily goings on in Buckinghamshire because it is where I am from and it interests me! Just a thought ............
Fair comment Bex but I think that there is more too it than that. Yog only EVER comments wheh he or she can make a snide remark about the council or big up the lib dems..
Sorry , demoness, but if you read my post above, you will see my motives for querying the 'Brighton Gang's' comments was for historical / familial reasons .
.
Not for the political motives you thought might be behind those comments.
.
However you may glad (or sad) to learn that Brighton Council unlike Wycombe was until recently in a No Overall Control (NOC) situation. Mostly Tory but with a strong Labour and Green Party presence.
.
You may also be glad to learn that there were only 2 Lib Dem members .
The main point is that Brighton has not got what Wycombe has - a vast overwhelming Conservative majority which can and does bulldoze any project or decision they want through their powerful party machine.
.
This is not what I want from our democratic system - the WD council members just ignore the folk of Wycombe who they now consider as mere vote-fodder.
.
Brighton certainly has lots of problems, but not this one.
.
Regards to you and yours

weyfarer says...
8:33pm Wed 30 Sep 09

time to go clarke wrote:
weyfarer wrote: I'll say it again shall I; You voted them in, you reap what you sow I am afraid. Vote yourselves a town council and they will be able to bow to public pressure and save the thing. If you lot put as much energy into that as you have writing blogs on here Holywell will be saved. Looks like an interesting meeting at WDC coming up, how will Clarke & Co dodge this one?
Public invited to Full Council on 5th of October at 6.30pm in Council Chamber. Ill be in Public Gallery. Will be a few pool questions! Join me and discover the arrogance of the Tory Councillors who wont listen to public opinion
I will try to attend if possible. I hope in your response to their arrogant answers you will inform them that Wycombe would be far better served by a town council. Could it be that the reason WDC Tories are so against a town council is that it would be mainly made up of town members- probably Labour and Lib-Dem for the most part meaning they won't control it... Call me an old cynic, hmmm...

Neil Bailey Save Holywell Mead Pool says...
11:16am Thu 1 Oct 09

Dear All

Thank you for your continuing support and healthy debate. For all members of our local community please come and meet the pool group on Tuesday 13th October at the Environment Centre at 7:30 - 9:30 pm. We will be available to discuss the excellent opportunities that the pool and it's facilities potentially presents to the Wycombe Community - for those who expressed interest in the Brighton link there is an interesting organisation called the Brighton Swim Centre that is one of the largest lifesaving and swimming teacher training centres in the country. It would be delightful to see Wycombe develop it's own version of this to skill up many of the people in our community for new careers and new hope.

Regards Neil Bailey

Chair

Holywell Mead Pool - Save Our Swim

Novacool88 says...
1:58am Sun 4 Oct 09

Maybe you should all get onto the only people the council listen too, The university, they need a pool and lets face it, what the uni wants the uni gets, it would be better than another multi story car park


Campaigners outside Holywell Mead swimming pool Cllr Lesley Clarke.JPG

Council boss: pool issue "shut"

Cllr Lesley Clarke



Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses