News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


bux2

Your Area News by you News by email Contact Twitter facebook Blogs Topics Video


Full story: 'Project Pinewood' rejected after unanimous vote


UNIQUE plans for a £200m expansion at Pinewood Studios were thrown out by councillors after a mass demonstration this afternoon.

More than 100 protesters were at the South Bucks District Council building as the planning committee discussed the proposal to build live-in film sets with 1,400 new homes on Green Belt land in Iver Heath.

A marquee was set up outside the Capswood building in Denham for protesters to watch the proceedings and a loud cheer could be heard as councillors voted unanimously to reject the plan.

Councillors were shown artist's impressions of the live-in sets, which would include a mock-Parisian square and Venice canal.

But Cllr Mike Thomson accused Pinewood of showing a “lack of respect and recognition” to the Green Belt, while Cllr Deirdre Holloway said the studios had tried to sprinkle star dust in councillors eyes.

She said: “Behind these sets you just have a housing estate - to build so many houses in the Green Belt is every developers dream.”

Committee chairman Jacquetta Lowen-Cooper summed up members views saying the decision should not be seen as 'anti-Pinewood'.

She said: "We feel strongly about our Green Belt land and we don't want development on it.”

An industry insider, who asked not to be named, said Pinewood would appeal the decision.

The appeal would go before the Planning Inspectorate, an independent national body that rules on complex or controversial planning applications.

It could be judged at a public inquiry.

Cllr Julian Wilson, representing the residents of Iver Heath, warned Pinewood could sell the land to developers once planning permission is obtained.

He told the meeting: “This proposal by Pinewood Studios Ltd can only be a way to maximise the value of the Green Belt land they have bought.

“1,400 houses in this area will sell for, on my estimation, £420m – what a valuable outline planning permission to sell.”

Protester Mitchell Gear spoke for the 'Stop Pinewood' campaign and afterwards told the BFP: “This is only the first step but there was some very sensible and rational arguments put forward by councillors.

“Once all the homes have been built it will be a huge asset to sell – that is not in the public interest.”

Ivan Dunleavy, the chief executive of the studios parent company, Pinewood Shepperton PLC, told councillors that the benefits of skills, training, jobs, affordable homes and growth presented by the project gave it very special circumstances to develop on the Green Belt.

Group director for corporate affairs at Pinewood Andrew Smith said after the meeting: “This project is of national significance and of great benefit not only to our community and region but also to the UK and its creative industries. “We remain committed to the vision of this project and to developing and sustaining UK creative industries at Pinewood for the future. We will now review the details of South Bucks District Council’s decision”.

Protesters had arrived at Capswood from 3.30pm and though some squashed into the meeting, most watched the proceedings via a video link in a marquee outside. Patricia Selby-Lowndes lives on Fulmer Common Road, near the proposed site, and was delighted with the unanimous decision.

She said: “What a lot of tosh from Pinewood – how about 'Project Green Belt instead?” Her neighbour Jeff Sparrow said: “Now that's a result – this was just an excuse to build 1,400 houses which they can then sell off.”

Wendy Angell, 43, lives in Iver Heath and said the traffic is already terrible through the village: “Our pictures on the wall shake when big vans go through and this would just make things worse. “This is just a massive housing development and should be treated as one.”

Elly Angell, 70, said: “We can't get planning permission for an extension to our house because it's on protected land – why should Pinewood get to build over a thousand new homes?”


Comments(10)

Oliver Newbury says...
5:57pm Wed 21 Oct 09

NIMBY's! I agree about the houses - we don't need them - but the studio! It must be allowed to grow. Think of the jobs and the boost to the local economy.
-
You can hardly see Pinewood as it is. I'm sure an extension would be well hidden and not a scar on the landscape. Oh well...

James_Booker says...
6:43pm Wed 21 Oct 09

Oliver Newbury wrote:
NIMBY's! I agree about the houses - we don't need them - but the studio! It must be allowed to grow. Think of the jobs and the boost to the local economy. - You can hardly see Pinewood as it is. I'm sure an extension would be well hidden and not a scar on the landscape. Oh well...
I doubt whether many people would have a problem with Pinewood expanding within their own site. People are objecting to them trying to build a massive housing estate in a totally inappropriate location.

Your assertion that 'an extension would be well hidden and not a scar on the landscape' suggests that you haven't even looked at the plans before commenting.

Pinewood is a company on the verge of finanical ruin and this project is a desperate act of vandalism that must be resisted.

Oliver Newbury says...
6:56pm Wed 21 Oct 09

James_Booker wrote:
Oliver Newbury wrote:
NIMBY's! I agree about the houses - we don't need them - but the studio! It must be allowed to grow. Think of the jobs and the boost to the local economy. - You can hardly see Pinewood as it is. I'm sure an extension would be well hidden and not a scar on the landscape. Oh well...
I doubt whether many people would have a problem with Pinewood expanding within their own site. People are objecting to them trying to build a massive housing estate in a totally inappropriate location.

Your assertion that 'an extension would be well hidden and not a scar on the landscape' suggests that you haven't even looked at the plans before commenting.

Pinewood is a company on the verge of finanical ruin and this project is a desperate act of vandalism that must be resisted.
No, I haven't looked at the plans. I am basing my assertion on what I already know or believe to be the case. I may be wrong.
-
I just don't want Pinewood Studios to fall. It's a fantastic facility.

WycombeSuxers says...
7:52pm Wed 21 Oct 09

hooray! they better not appeal because then we could be in trouble

JonathanStuart-Brown says...
9:29pm Wed 21 Oct 09

Save The British Film Industry assure The Pinewood Studio staff in Iver Heath that we seek to guarantee and provide extra job security for them in their present place of work.

Now Pinewood Shepperton's planning application is refused , the film manufacturing sector will finally expand out of the South East Only club.

However it will be more secure in Iver Heath at the same time.

We aim for a minimum 15 acre site in every county in The UK; initially linking Pinewood Studios HQ in Iver Heath to The West Midlands along the M40 and M42.

Indiana Jones and Star Wars were made on a 15 acre site. So every county gets the tools to do the job but each can be part of THE PINEWOOD STUDIOS brand. Every Region's Regeneration and Lottery money can be in the Pinewood coffers.

The proposed 100 acre major state-of-the-art bold brilliant Pinewood Studios expansion can be done much bigger, much better and with sounder finances in The West Midlands.

Pinewood can build their sets, theme parks, trade on big scale tourism, be close to The Shakespeare tourist industry in Stratford-on-Avon and if need be assisted by West Midland regeneration finance.

Gisela Stuart MP will call for a relocation of the expansion to Longbridge tomorrow now planning permission is refused South Bucks. Other MPs will echo the call and there are several West Midland sites which are suitable.

Our aim is for Pinewood Shepperton PLC to think bigger and become as visible in the UK as The NHS. Then Pinewood Studios will be similarly loved and more secure in public finance should they ever have a few lean years.

This will shore up longterm job security in the HQ and heritage site of Pinewood Studios, Iver Heath.

Pinewood can plan bigger to build The Pyramids, sci-fi sets, Beijing, Moscow, Tokyo, Washington, whatever is in demand for film and TV production BUT do so within The UK rather than take jobs to cheap labour, cheap land in China and Malaysia.

They can attract in any TV and film production in any language offering the full list of sets, sound stages, post-production which any financier may require.

Finally they will be a British brand able to take on and maybe one day takeover Coca Cola, McDonalds and Sony, Disney, anyone.

The Pinewood Studios mothership will still be in Iver Heath along with the beautiful community and greenbelt land.
A feel good, nay feelgreat ending. Justice and freedom at long last. Finally a genuine British Film Industry.
......and a vital victory for EVERY greenbelt in South-East England.

Stop Project Pinewood we salute your courage, resolve, integrity.
Pinewood Board and Shareholders we are ready to talk. Gisela Stuart MP is ready to lead the expansion to Longbridge and West Midlands . You will love it when you see it.

Jonathan Stuart-Brown
www.savethebritishfi
lmindustry.com

JonathanStuart-Brown says...
9:52pm Wed 21 Oct 09

Happy Birthday Ronnie, a double celebration !
Jonathan Stuart-Brown
www.savethebritishfi
lmindustry.com

Oliver Newbury says...
10:03pm Wed 21 Oct 09

JonathanStuart-Brown wrote:
Save The British Film Industry assure The Pinewood Studio staff in Iver Heath that we seek to guarantee and provide extra job security for them in their present place of work.

Now Pinewood Shepperton's planning application is refused , the film manufacturing sector will finally expand out of the South East Only club.

However it will be more secure in Iver Heath at the same time.

We aim for a minimum 15 acre site in every county in The UK; initially linking Pinewood Studios HQ in Iver Heath to The West Midlands along the M40 and M42.

Indiana Jones and Star Wars were made on a 15 acre site. So every county gets the tools to do the job but each can be part of THE PINEWOOD STUDIOS brand. Every Region's Regeneration and Lottery money can be in the Pinewood coffers.

The proposed 100 acre major state-of-the-art bold brilliant Pinewood Studios expansion can be done much bigger, much better and with sounder finances in The West Midlands.

Pinewood can build their sets, theme parks, trade on big scale tourism, be close to The Shakespeare tourist industry in Stratford-on-Avon and if need be assisted by West Midland regeneration finance.

Gisela Stuart MP will call for a relocation of the expansion to Longbridge tomorrow now planning permission is refused South Bucks. Other MPs will echo the call and there are several West Midland sites which are suitable.

Our aim is for Pinewood Shepperton PLC to think bigger and become as visible in the UK as The NHS. Then Pinewood Studios will be similarly loved and more secure in public finance should they ever have a few lean years.

This will shore up longterm job security in the HQ and heritage site of Pinewood Studios, Iver Heath.

Pinewood can plan bigger to build The Pyramids, sci-fi sets, Beijing, Moscow, Tokyo, Washington, whatever is in demand for film and TV production BUT do so within The UK rather than take jobs to cheap labour, cheap land in China and Malaysia.

They can attract in any TV and film production in any language offering the full list of sets, sound stages, post-production which any financier may require.

Finally they will be a British brand able to take on and maybe one day takeover Coca Cola, McDonalds and Sony, Disney, anyone.

The Pinewood Studios mothership will still be in Iver Heath along with the beautiful community and greenbelt land.
A feel good, nay feelgreat ending. Justice and freedom at long last. Finally a genuine British Film Industry.
......and a vital victory for EVERY greenbelt in South-East England.

Stop Project Pinewood we salute your courage, resolve, integrity.
Pinewood Board and Shareholders we are ready to talk. Gisela Stuart MP is ready to lead the expansion to Longbridge and West Midlands . You will love it when you see it.

Jonathan Stuart-Brown
www.savethebritishfi

lmindustry.com
That sounds great- as long as Pinewood in Iver Heath is recognised at the original Pinewood.
-
We've got to have a bit of pride!

JonathanStuart-Brown says...
11:13pm Wed 21 Oct 09

If you read the website posts you will see this is one of the core goals of Save The British Film Industry. You are the original, The HQ, the place of highest honour. We just want to boost the brand and do the stuff you do not want...and give every county in the UK a stake in Pinewood Studios future maximising your public and political support across the nation. We are not grabbing from but giving to Iver Heath.
We are partners not predators. Come and see the money and the space(s) we have to offer.
Jonathan Stuart-Brown
www.savethebritishfi
lmindustry.com

Voyeur says...
12:46am Thu 22 Oct 09

I cannot see why councillors who rejected this application cannot be a little more far sighted.
.
Surely it is not beyond the realms of possibility to trade off this Green belt land with some other area which is not yet in the Green belt and thereby maintain the Green Belt balance without stopping much needed development and expansion of what certainly is a local important industry.
.
If it goes to appeal I suspect the Government Planning Inspector will give it the nod anyway.

David Smyth says...
1:45pm Thu 22 Oct 09

Voyeur, HW says...
12:46am Thu 22 Oct 09

I cannot see why councillors who rejected this application cannot be a little more far sighted.
.
Surely it is not beyond the realms of possibility to trade off this Green belt land with some other area which is not yet in the Green belt and thereby maintain the Green Belt balance without stopping much needed development and expansion of what certainly is a local important industry.
YVoyeur, HW
Your understanding of what constitutes green belt seemingly approaches the same level as Pinewood's, none! SBDC were entirely right in rejecting this blot on the landscape. Pinewood already heve permissions to develop their current site/business park. Indeed, Pinewood could easily accommodate a lot of their proposals, even before divesting the substantiial proportion of their current site of non film making activities. There would not be room for 1400 homes in any such development, but if you read the planning officers report then you would accept that this was inappropiate in this area in any case and for many reasons. SBDC Planning Committee endorsed fully the findings in the report.
This peoposal was never about film making in the first place. Pinewood were decieving people in this respect. It was about Pinewood Companie/s making vast profits from a building development.
There are brown field sites up and down the country that would welcome a home building proposal though unlikely in the form that Pinewood proposed. Hopefully Pinewood will have the sense to draw a line under this, not appeal, and get back to their business of providing facilities for the making of films, somthing they claim to be world class in providing already!


'Project Pinewood' rejected after unanimous vote 'Project Pinewood' rejected after unanimous vote

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses