News RSS Feed


Bid to slash Buckinghamshire County Council pothole budget axed


COUNCIL bosses today agreed not to slash the pothole budget in half after an outcry from residents.

Buckinghamshire County Council’s cabinet said £678,000 should not be taken from the popular ‘We’re Working On It’ programme as planned.

The county’s roads were littered with more potholes after last month’s prolonged snow and ice. The county pumped in £2m as an immediate measure.

The decision was taken ‘in light of the current state of the county’s road surfaces’ and cuts to funding in recent years, a council report says.

It says the move is possible because more homes will be charged council tax, netting the council an extra £1.4m.

The move comes as the council announced a pay freeze for staff (see link, bottom of story).

Councillor Peter Hardy, who led a watchdog probe which urged against the cut, said: "We are very pleased. Public concern on roads had increased dramatically.

"The question will be 'will that be enough?'"

Waste chiefs will also keep a threatened £681,000 because of ‘increased uncertainty’ over the cost of an incinerator, set to be built in Bedfordshire.

It means the council will be asked to confirm a two per cent increase in its share of the council tax, about two thirds of the final bill.

This will take its share to £1,077.74, an extra £21.13 on this year.

Conservative council leader, Councillor David Shakespeare, today said this would be 2.5 per cent the following two years – but zero under a Tory Government.

Yet a raft of job losses and service reductions will go ahead including cuts to library opening hours, youth workers and rights of way maintenance (see link, bottom of story).

Already, 71 posts have been lost as part of a £21.4m savings programme. More than half were through not filling empty posts, the report says.

So far, bosses have identified 31 more who will be made redundant. About 200 jobs will go in the next two years.

A major pressure facing the council is looked after children, with councils expected to do more in light of the Baby P scandal.

This could see the council overspend by £2.2m and £100,000 will be taken from Sure Start children’s centres, for the county’s poorest youngsters, to help fund care.

Bosses also warn a Government pledge to give free personal care to the most vulnerable OAPs living at home will put a £1.7m dent in the budget.

The council says it will lose an estimated £1.7m savings it hoped to find from sharing services with other councils.

This 'Pathfinder' plan was scrapped last month amid controversy after it emerged the councils had spent £1.2m setting it up (see link, bottom of story).

The budget will need to be approved by the Conservative-controlled authority next month.



Your Say YourBucks

faye93x, Wooburn Green says...
4:58pm Mon 8 Feb 10

"It means the council will be asked to confirm a two per cent increase in its share of the council tax, about two thirds of the final bill" - so hang on a minute, am I reading this right? a possible 2% INCREASE in the BCC bill???? Now how did Windsor and Maidenhead Council manage a 4% REDUCTION in the bill and still managed to cope in the wintery conditions???? (Now some of you may say to go and live in Windsor and Maidenhead Council district if I am that concerned - I have done for many years and moved to Wooburn Green to get out of Maidenhead) If I have read this wrong I so apologise

towncryer, HIgh Wycombe town says...
6:24pm Mon 8 Feb 10

Bucks is a Tory Run council that has total dominace to ride roughshod over residents.
Windsor and Maidenhead is marginal seat for Tories and they have to be more careful with funds and increases of will lose council again to Liberal Dems

The answer to Bucks is stop voting TORY !!!

tigeran, high wycombe says...
10:46pm Mon 8 Feb 10

towncryer wrote:
Bucks is a Tory Run council that has total dominace to ride roughshod over residents. Windsor and Maidenhead is marginal seat for Tories and they have to be more careful with funds and increases of will lose council again to Liberal Dems The answer to Bucks is stop voting TORY !!!
Stop voting Labour!! At the end of the day they are the ones who have total control over what happens!! Wycombe is not Labour so get b*gger all funding. Get rid of Gordon Brown for ANYONE!!!

whingefree, Hazlemere says...
7:56am Tue 9 Feb 10

Blimey Tigeran you are a loyal Tory.


Anyone reading this story, about a Tory Council that has been in power for about 100 years and manages to blame the Labour Party is living in the land of make believe.

DeepThinker, Wycombe says...
8:47am Tue 9 Feb 10

Unfortunately Tigeran is correct. Government funding will often be aimed more at those areas where the local council is the same political party as the government.
.
The Tories have done it before and the Labour Party are even worse at it, election or no election.
.
The other trick is for government to announce new initiatives and spending, but they only fund 50 - 80% of it. The local councils MUST carry these initiatives out and have to raise the money by cutting other services and/or raising council tax, for which the local council gets criticised for. Some areas do get a bigger share of the pot than others and that often depends on their political colour. Once again both Labour and Tories use this one quite regularly.

Agniesca, High Wycombe says...
9:58am Tue 9 Feb 10

Scrap property tax, have local income tax which would be based on ability to pay. Scrap central government grants, reduce national income tax. This would give local tax-payers a direct input to what they fund

moosecl, hazlemere says...
1:44pm Tue 9 Feb 10

Agniesca wrote:
Scrap property tax, have local income tax which would be based on ability to pay. Scrap central government grants, reduce national income tax. This would give local tax-payers a direct input to what they fund
You are making a lot of sense - somebody make this person an MP and sharpish.

williamharte, Loosley Row says...
2:36pm Tue 9 Feb 10

So the pothole budget has not been slashed - great! But this budget's being spent with a single contractor and, based on what I've seen recently, this contractor has few - if any - quality standards imposed as part of the contract which they've negotiated with Bucks CC!

What commercial principle is being applied when the Council puts itself in the hands of a monopoly supplier?

What aspect of 'commercial confidentiality' justifies the Council refusing to make public the terms of this contract - or any others - which they have entered into using our money?

What are the Council personnel doing to ensure that the quality standards being applied by their monopoly contractor are appropriate / reasonable?

kaytay, Princes Risborough says...
4:04pm Tue 9 Feb 10

All I ca say is I wish the potholes I had to drive over/past were as shallow as the ones in the picture! The worst bit is some of them have been filled in since the snow but then random ones have been left so you feel confident to drive on your side of the road then you hit one hard. I've aalready been to the garage to have some of the damage repaired!

Comments are closed on this article.

Potholes on Rose Avenue, Hazlemere - which one resident should be "condemned" Bid to slash pothole budget axed

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »