Send your news, photos and videos by texting bucksfreepress to 80360 or email
6:16pm Thursday 25th February 2010 in News By Oliver Evans
COUNCILLORS today approved a consultation on moving Adams Park stadium in what a their leader called a ‘momentous decision’.
Wycombe District Council cabinet members approved a major consultation that could see its planning policy changed to permit a new stadium.
A report says ‘all potential sites need to considered’ including those in the protected Green Belt.
Wycombe Air Park is thought to be a preferred choice for the stadium, which would re-house Wycombe Wanderers and London Wasps football and rugby clubs.
They were also asked to approve a controversial ‘collaboration agreement’ with the clubs.
The council will put cash into building the stadium and have a stake in its ownership, a move that has angered some who feel WDC should not be working to benefit a private business.
The Bucks Free Press and two members of the public were asked to leave under local government laws when this item was discussed.
This was because the information was about ‘the financial business of any particular person’.
After 40 minutes the press and public were allowed back in where the consultation was approved within minutes. It is thought the collaboration agreement was approved.
Council leader Lesley Clarke said: “I think you already know you made a momentous decision today.”
The council has earmarked £500,000 for the consultation to progress the ‘core strategy alteration’.
Cllr Clarke today told the Free Press this was the same £500,000 previously reported as being used for feasibility studies into the plan.
Options will be published in October for consultation with another consultation on the ‘preferred option’ in February 2011.
It would be given a public hearing by an independent inspector in May 2012.
The authority agreed in June 2008 to work with the clubs to ‘resolve the issues’ it faces within the next five years.
Wasps boss Steve Hayes – who also owns Wanderers – has warned the rugby club could leave the town unless a new stadium is found.
Today’s report says the clubs ‘share a constrained site which limits the scope of both clubs’ ambitions and does not reflect their potential contribution to the district’s profile, economy or community’.
It warns the council could face a challenge from the Government if it approved a stadium plan that was not allowed under its policies.
We reported earlier today how an 83-year-old man has written to Prime Minister Gordon Brown opposing the scheme.
Click the link below to read the full report presented to the council today.
Comments(29)
BigTommy
says...
7:11pm Thu 25 Feb 10
readerabc
says...
7:33pm Thu 25 Feb 10
Laneender
says...
8:05pm Thu 25 Feb 10
MC=2
says...
9:39pm Thu 25 Feb 10
sportsturf
says...
9:40pm Thu 25 Feb 10
BOGITS
says...
9:42pm Thu 25 Feb 10
chris740
says...
10:26pm Thu 25 Feb 10
J B Blackett
says...
1:02am Fri 26 Feb 10
Laneender
says...
8:54am Fri 26 Feb 10
J B Blackett wrote:Exactly, I wonder whether Wanderers fans make of this? I can't imagine that they would want to leave Adam's Park for a Stadium that quite frankly would make one feel like they were chucking a sausage down a High Street. Wycombe doesn't need Hayes, Wycombe needs another Martin O'Neil.
It seems all so secretive, sly, sneaky and smelly - and that's just the people involved. . The project itself has a strange stomach-wrenching stench also (IMHO)
wayneo
says...
9:00am Fri 26 Feb 10
Laneender wrote:I agree with you, however the members of WAPAG probably haven't seen the feasibility technical reports as to how they are going to carve up the airfield. The Gliding will go, heli-traffic will get worse in my opinion, incuding more turbines so bully for them, they'll have to explain to their neighbours how they not only have an airpark next door but a ruddy great Stadium, hotel, housing and retail outlets sitting in between LaneEnd and Cressex.
Keep putting in as many requests for information, lobby your MP Councillors etc. Hayes might be able to bully his supporters but he won't bully us. I've nothing but contempt and loathing for this man. This with WAPAG and various other councillors has been engineered from the start, well enough is enough; if it's a battle they want then a battle is what they are going to get.
TheT0nemeister
says...
9:33am Fri 26 Feb 10
wayneo
says...
9:33am Fri 26 Feb 10
martyb
says...
12:10pm Fri 26 Feb 10
busman2009
says...
12:34pm Fri 26 Feb 10
JP80
says...
12:43pm Fri 26 Feb 10
yog
says...
12:52pm Fri 26 Feb 10
sai-diva
says...
1:12pm Fri 26 Feb 10
wayneo
says...
2:23pm Fri 26 Feb 10
wayneo
says...
2:27pm Fri 26 Feb 10
sai-diva wrote:Send Clarke a picture of yourself in a gold frame, that might suffice.
I want to move my business and if I don't get a bung from the council, I'm off. Where do I apply??
Monte Cristo
says...
5:20pm Fri 26 Feb 10
demoness
says...
5:57pm Fri 26 Feb 10
hondo
says...
7:41pm Fri 26 Feb 10
Wanda Brown
says...
11:19pm Fri 26 Feb 10
wayneo wrote:Oh it doens't have to be gold, she can be bought with silver and a light lunch!
sai-diva wrote: I want to move my business and if I don't get a bung from the council, I'm off. Where do I apply??Send Clarke a picture of yourself in a gold frame, that might suffice.
hondo
says...
2:49am Sat 27 Feb 10
John Ley
says...
11:21pm Mon 15 Mar 10
John Ley
says...
11:28pm Mon 15 Mar 10
John Ley wrote:I meant to say Transportation Winter Maintenance Budget 1,005,708 2009/10 - Bucks County Council above.
Winter Maintenance Budget 1,005,708 2009/10 - Bucks County Council. Adams Park stadium consultation budget £500,000 - Wycombe District Council. Doesn't this just show that local government just don't have a clue when it comes to spending taxpayers money!
John Ley
says...
11:44pm Mon 15 Mar 10
BigTommy wrote:The Bucks County Council Transportation “Winter Maintenance” budget was only 1,005,708 in 2009/10 – if local government can’t afford to grit the roads properly when it snows then they certainly should not be paying 500,000 for planning the relocation of Adams Park Football ground.
Half a million pounds! ~ What a waste ~ Steve Hayes must be laughing his head off - as must the councillors who have received presents from him in the past. ~ I wonder of they will get any more presents from him? ~ This ISN'T money spent for the good of the town. This ISN'T the time to be spending the money in this way. ~ The council will save money by making cutbacks and by reducing the number of people they employ. They will raise council tax "to ensure services can be maintained" and yet they will "earmark" £500,000 for this consultation. ~ How is this money to be spent? Do they employ outside consultants? What are the connections between Steve Hayes, Councillors and Consultants? Are any "friends" going to benefit? Who is going to make money - no matter what the outcome of the "consultation"? ~ THIS IS DISGUSTING.
Wanda Brown
says...
12:07am Thu 18 Mar 10
Find a job in Buckinghamshire.
Search Now »
Make a date in Buckinghamshire now!
Search Now »
Search for properties across the UK.
Search Now »
Find used vehicles for sale in Buckinghamshire
Search Now »
ivor says...
6:26pm Thu 25 Feb 10
~
It's a disgrace and a snub in the face for the taxpayers of the Wycombe district.
~
Have you read Ivor’s blog today? Click on the “YOUR SAY” link at the top of the page then click on “BLOGS”.