News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


bux2

Your Area News by you News by email Contact Twitter facebook Blogs Topics Video


Buckinghamshire house sales 'fall through because of train plan' High Speed 2


HOUSE sales have fallen through after controversial plans were announced to run a new high speed train line through the Buckinghamshire countryside, a councillor has said.

Councillor Martin Tett said people had called him ‘in tears’ because the plan – announced on March 10 – had made their sale fall through.

And he said he has never seen such a strong public reaction to an issue than the proposed route, to run under the Chalfonts and Amersham and overground by Great Missenden.

He said: “From the day this was announced there are people ringing up saying their purchasers have pulled out of the purchase of their houses.”

This included one deal which collapsed on the day the route was announced, he said.

Cllr Tett, cabinet member for strategic planning for Buckinghamshire County Council, said: “I have never seen such a massive explosion of concern and apprehension across Buckinghamshire.”

Some still though the plan – for 250mph trains to the Midlands and north – was a ‘small Railway Children type’ scheme.

Yet he said: “This is not – this is a rail motorway.”

Branding the plan ‘catastrophic’ he said: “We have to fight this proposal for all our residents.”

And he said he wanted to give ‘particular credit to the press who have done a great job in publicising this’. The Bucks Free Press last week launched a campaign opposing the plan.

Councillor Mike Colston said the county was ‘famous’ for the protected Chilterns Area of Outstand Natural Beauty, which the line would cut through.

This is one of two within 70 miles of London, he said. “They act as the living lungs for London so people can get away from the stress of urban living.”

The overground section would be a ’25 mile swathe of destruction through some of the finest countryside in the South East of England’.

He said he hoped the Government would find a colony of rare animals such as crested newts so the plan could not go ahead.

Councillor Marion Clayton said the impact would be ‘unbelievable, horrendous’ while Councillor Bill Chapple said: “It is pie in the sky but is absolute devastation on the ground.”

And she said she was ‘appalled’ that there would be no public inquiry into whether it should go ahead as it would be presented as a bill in Parliament.

A public consultation will take place later this year.

Councillor Valerie Letheren, responsible for transportation, said: “The blight is going to be huge.”

She said council chiefs met transport minister Lord Adonis the day before the route was announced.

Cllr Letheren said: “We told them then if they went through the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and Buckinghamshire, the reaction they would get.

“I don’t think they would have been disappointed. Ever since that was published there has been tremendous alarm from our residents.”

The Government is consulting on compensation for people who will experience ‘exceptional hardship’ as a result of the line, which would be open by 2026.

A debate on the impact of the plan on the county will be held in Parliament this week.

Click the link below for our stories on the plans.


Comments(9)

miccles says...
12:21pm Mon 22 Mar 10

Fix the roads, and the countryside would look even better.

motco says...
12:40pm Mon 22 Mar 10

"Cllr Tett, cabinet member for strategic planning for Buckinghamshire County Council, said: “I have never seen such a massive explosion of concern and apprehension across Buckinghamshire.”

Not since the incinerator plans in 2008 then!

J B Blackett says...
12:57pm Mon 22 Mar 10

motco wrote:
"Cllr Tett, cabinet member for strategic planning for Buckinghamshire County Council, said: “I have never seen such a massive explosion of concern and apprehension across Buckinghamshire.”

Not since the incinerator plans in 2008 then!
I think the poor old Councillor has lost his train of thought , y'know !
.
And his memory !
.
Perhaps he forgot he's got a (conveniently) bad memory.

Timbers says...
1:18pm Mon 22 Mar 10

..and still the Conservatives refuse to acknowledge or come clean about their OWN plans for a high-speed rail route - and one which they propose to start building two years quicker (which can surely only mean LESS public consultation)! Here are some quotes from the Conservative Party's published policy document "Conservative Rail Review":

"A Conservative Government will give the go-ahead for a new high speed line connecting Leeds, Manchester, Birmingham, London and Heathrow"

"The benefits of a full high speed network could produce economic benefits of £63 billion across the country over 60 years"

"We have conducted a detailed desktop feasibility study drawing on exceptional work already conducted by leading engineers such as Atkins"

"We are confident that the business case for the new line is so strong that so long as the taxpayer meets the upfront cost of land and track, the expected returns would mean that the private sector could meet the remainder of the cost."

"Since the planning and preparation process would take at least 4 to 5 years, we would target construction to begin in 2015 and run to 2027"

"Good connections to major airports could also significantly enhance the benefits of high speed rail. So a Conservative Government will support proposals along the lines of the plan put forward by engineering firm Arup, for a new Heathrow rail hub...The plan would also include construction of a new high speed link connecting Heathrow airport to the Channel Tunnel Rail Link and the new route north"

"This is a long term project, but one which we are determined to deliver"

Now then, local Tory MPs and candidates - come clean and tell us in detail what YOUR proposals are, and stop hiding behind a smokescreen of opportunistic spin!

Come on BFP - ask the questions of David Liddington and Cheryl Gillan in particular!

rushma says...
2:02pm Mon 22 Mar 10

miccles wrote:
Fix the roads, and the countryside would look even better.
... and while fixing the roads, why can't the existing chiltern rail track be upgraded to allow high speed operation?

J B Blackett says...
2:34pm Mon 22 Mar 10

rushma wrote:
miccles wrote:
Fix the roads, and the countryside would look even better.
... and while fixing the roads, why can't the existing chiltern rail track be upgraded to allow high speed operation?
Please read the report - that explains why not. It's on the internet for your edification and convenience.

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze says...
4:10pm Mon 22 Mar 10

I guess that depends on whether a document written by HS2 Ltd can be trusted to represent an objective and comprehensive assessment of the option to upgrade the Chilterns line. Granted, achieving 250mph and Bham to London in 49 mins might not be achieveable, but what could be achieved, and would that be adequate to deliver say 99% of the CO2 savings claimed by the 'preferred' route?

J B Blackett says...
6:06pm Mon 22 Mar 10

You are too cynical, Ewart.
.
The High Wycombe route is too curvy ; also too up and down (gradients). Tunnels would work but would be costly.
.
I am inclined to think that not one of these inappropriate projects will ever come to fruition - for a multitude of reasons.
.
Regards

Why am I paying for your third home? says...
10:18am Tue 23 Mar 10

Have all these Bucks Conservative councillors asked their own Party's Shadow Transport Secretary why she is refusing to rule out the Misbourne Valley HS2 route under a possible Conservative Government? If not why not? I assume they think they're going to win the General election so this is as much a question for the Conservatives as it is for Labour (if not more so).

Or is this another case of Conservatives in Bucks pretending to be all things to all people. Given that the Conservatives are committed to building HS2 to a quicker timetable than Labour, the "we're keeping our options" open approach from Theresa Villiers is just adding to the rising level of concern locally. If local Conservatives were really that concerned they'd be demanding publicly that Villiers rules out the route published by the Labour Government. Why aren't they doing that? If its that important an issue to them as they claim will they do the honourable thing and resign from the Conservative party if national Conservative policy keeps open the option of the Amersham, Misbourne valley route, thus subjecting local people to many more months and possibly years of worry? I suspect not...


NORTH KENT: High speed trains to London to make area more popular House sales 'fall through because of train plan'

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses