News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Wanderers' Little Marlow stadium idea 'nuts'

Marlow Football Club stadium design plans at the Little Marlow gravel pits from 2008 Marlow Football Club stadium design plans at the Little Marlow gravel pits from 2008

THE possibility of a new Wycombe Wanderers stadium in Little Marlow 75 times larger than a recently rejected ground proposal for Marlow FC has been labelled 'nuts'.

Little Marlow Gravel Pits was named among 19 possible sites for a joint ground with rugby club Wasps - just five months after plans for a new 264 seater stadium for Marlow FC were kicked out.

A public inquiry, held in February, ruled against the plan.

It backed a decision by Wycombe District Councillors to reject the move a year earlier.

The announcement has been met with bewilderment from leading figures on both sides of Marlow FC's long running stadium move battle.

The plan to replace Wycombe Wanderers current Adams Park ground would include a stadium with up to 20,000 seats.

Ray Frith, a director of Marlow FC, said it “would be a smack in the face” if it went beyond the initial list of possibilities.

He said: “Yes, if it were planned that Wycombe Wanderers or a big sports club was located there we would be absolutely horrified and really annoyed because that's what we have been doing for the last ten years."

The Oak Tree Road outfit's director said: “It would be a kick in the stomach if we found that that was what they were seriously thinking about it.

“We have been slapped down and we have bent backwards to appease the objectors.”

He added: “However, if it did indeed involve Marlow FC we would be delighted.”

Mike Overall was coordinator of the Little Marlow Gravel Pits Partnership which fought against Marlow FC's proposal.

The group, including residents, conservation groups and parish councillors, welcomed the planning inspector's finding in February that it was “inappropriate development in the Green Belt”.

Mr Overall said: “I think the council have gone nuts to even suggest it following the rejection of the North West Estates (the developer) proposal on appeal.

“I'm appalled to think they can even suggest it after all those decisions.

“I can't see that working out it's pretty far fetched.”

He said some of the sites were “crazy”.

“The only ones there that would really make any sense there would be the Cressex and the Handy Cross ones, all the rest are going right into the countryside,” he said.

Jerry Unsworth, WDC’s head of planning, said the inclusion of all the sites on the list ‘doesn’t mean they are deliverable or sensible’.

He said: “We are not suggesting they are sensible sites. That is what the evaluation will do, it will pull out their merits and de-merits.

“We have to demonstrate at the end of the process that we have properly looked at all reasonable options.”

Sites have been included as they meet criteria that includes being in or close to a built up area and not being in the protected Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Mr Unsworth, referring to Little Marlow Gravel Pits, said: “It has been rejected for Marlow Football Club but maybe that case for Marlow Football Club wasn’t good enough.”

Other potential sites include the Baker Street car park to the west of High Wycombe town centre and Terriers Farm, off the Amersham Road, where homes plans have been rejected.

The sites listed by the council:

1. M40 Gateway West (Cressex Island).

2. Abbey Barn South.

3. Abbey Barn South and land East of Abbey Barn Lane.

4. Abbey Barn South and RAF Daws Hill.

5. RAF Daws Hill.

6. Town Centre West (Baker Street).

7. Former Compair Site.

8. Adams Park Stadium & adjoining land.

9. Wycombe Air Park 10. M40 Gateway East (Handy Cross).

11. Marlow Gravel Pits.

12. Terriers Farm.

13. Gomm Valley.

14. Abbey Barn North.

15. Slate Meadow.

16. Park Mill Farm.

17. Land North of Longwick Road.

18. Land off Summerlease Road.

19. Land off Wooburn Moor.

Comments(17)

yog says...
8:31am Sat 24 Jul 10

What a shambles this failing Council is. Disgraceful to blight 19 areas of the district just to pretend they are considering all options when we all know they have already made their decision.
How much more money is this failing council going to pour down the drain?

Dale_C says...
8:34am Sat 24 Jul 10

Its hilarious that Adams Park is listed as one of the potential sites. Wouldn't it be far cheaper to redevelop the current ground and build a second access road.

ferrellcat says...
9:18am Sat 24 Jul 10

20. Swimming pool and eco centre on the rye
21.Wycombe general hospital
22.Frogmoor
23.The high st

yog says...
10:21am Sat 24 Jul 10

24. Eden Centre
25. Town Centre East (Queen Victoria Road)

BigTommy says...
10:23am Sat 24 Jul 10

26. Somewhere directly in line with the proposed high speed rail line.

BigTommy says...
10:25am Sat 24 Jul 10

27. Sudbury housing estate where the LONDON Wasps used to have a ground.

yog says...
10:27am Sat 24 Jul 10

28. SWR school Hazlemere

yog says...
10:33am Sat 24 Jul 10

29. 150A West Wycombe Rd (Tory HQ)

Plus ça change... says...
10:34am Sat 24 Jul 10

29. ALL the thousands of square miles of 'grass' verges ...!!


10,080 minutes in one week.

If playing 24/7, that would 112 ninety- or eighty-minute long games back-to-back.

Time for everyone to play!

yog says...
10:38am Sat 24 Jul 10

31. Dashwood Estate

yog says...
10:49am Sat 24 Jul 10

32. Wendover ;-)

BOGITS says...
11:27am Sat 24 Jul 10

I smell a rat, no let me rephrase that, rats lots of them. How can we believe a two faced council? I would move the councillors to a new site perhaps somewhere on the mid atlantic as far away as possible! Am I to believe the same bunch of morons are thinking of all these options? I think we should start to ask where all the funding and money is coming from, as always the money comes from the council tax payer to fund The Steve Hayes Bandwagon. Since when did we contemplate moving football clubs to other towns? Oh yes remember Wimbledon packed their bags to Milton Keynes. London Wasps to Wycombe, clubs changing their names faster than DEPOL can handle. I am with the Little Marlow lot, if you think you had a problem with Marlow FC AT at least you had a chance and won, with Wycombe Council, Steve Hayes & Wycombe Wanderers (AKA Sands FC) together with the London Wasps unfortunately they will steamroller everything through regardless! So beware wherever they decide to stuff this unwanted needless stadium that only fills with about 4000 football fans. This council cannot be trusted, watch this space!

J B Blackett says...
12:33pm Sat 24 Jul 10

BOGITS wrote:
I smell a rat, no let me rephrase that, rats lots of them. How can we believe a two faced council? I would move the councillors to a new site perhaps somewhere on the mid atlantic as far away as possible! Am I to believe the same bunch of morons are thinking of all these options? I think we should start to ask where all the funding and money is coming from, as always the money comes from the council tax payer to fund The Steve Hayes Bandwagon. Since when did we contemplate moving football clubs to other towns? Oh yes remember Wimbledon packed their bags to Milton Keynes. London Wasps to Wycombe, clubs changing their names faster than DEPOL can handle. I am with the Little Marlow lot, if you think you had a problem with Marlow FC AT at least you had a chance and won, with Wycombe Council, Steve Hayes & Wycombe Wanderers (AKA Sands FC) together with the London Wasps unfortunately they will steamroller everything through regardless! So beware wherever they decide to stuff this unwanted needless stadium that only fills with about 4000 football fans. This council cannot be trusted, watch this space!
You may be right , BOGITS. But the odds are on a lot of red herrings being trailed to distrect people from a decision that's already been taken.
.
What ever the fait accompli decision is , it will not be to the advantage of any in Wycombe or Marlow , except the devious self-serving group of politicians and business persons.
.
That's MHO.
.
Show me a politician that can be trusted and I'll hold up , at most , two fingers.
.
Regards

Voyeur says...
1:00am Sun 25 Jul 10

33. Beaconsfield High School.

hondo says...
12:18pm Sun 25 Jul 10

34. The cupboard under my stairs.

hondo says...
12:28pm Sun 25 Jul 10

Dale_C wrote:
Its hilarious that Adams Park is listed as one of the potential sites. Wouldn't it be far cheaper to redevelop the current ground and build a second access road.
Expansion already refused, the Green Belt will not have been breached and Steve wouldn't make any money.

yog says...
8:13pm Mon 26 Jul 10

35. United Way, CO4 5UP

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree