News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


bux2

Your Area News by you News by email Contact Twitter facebook Blogs Topics Video


Wildlife 'under threat' from High Speed rail plans


RARE wildlife will be under threat if plans for a high speed rail route through the Chiltern district go ahead, a conservationist has warned.

Heather Lewis of the Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust said the planned railway line would be “like the Berlin Wall” because of the impact it would have on the environment.

The preferred route of the High Speed 2 rail project would cut through the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty in a series of tunnels and cuttings.

But this would go through three Sites of Special Scientific Interest, nine areas of Ancient Woodland and two of the Wildlife Trust's nature reserves. The preferred alternative line, further south towards the Hughenden Valley, would go through 13 Ancient Woodlands.

Miss Lewis, the Buckinghamshire Conservation Officer for the Trust, said this would break up animals' feeding grounds and destroy habitats, leading to declining populations – which she said were already “dropping off at quite a frightening rate”.

She said animals follow tree lines and natural landmarks to find their way around – but they would no longer be able to do this if the railway line is built.

Among the threatened species is a rare Coralroot plant, which is found in just two locations in the UK – one of which is in Weedon Hill Woods near Amersham.

Miss Lewis told the Bucks Free Press: “By fragmenting the landscape like this, you may as well have a 75 metre-wide wall. It will be like the Berlin Wall of wildlife as they won't be able to get across to the other side.

“The Government's argument will be they will recreate these habitats. What they don't understand is the adjacent fields will be agricultural and will have had pesticides used on them and won't necessarily be suitable.

“If the Government think they can create new landscapes elsewhere, they are wrong. They will never have these habitats back to this quality.”

She added: “I haven't seen any justification for the route they have chosen. They haven't convinced us from an environmental aspect. They haven't done an assessment to say, environmentally, that's the best route.”

Sites of Special Scientific Interest are protected by law, and an area of Ancient Woodland can only be designated if it is at least 400 years old.

Miss Lewis said: “They have been managed for years specifically to bring them up to a certain quality. You can't recreate them just like that, and it's impossible to recreate an area of ancient woodland.”

Embankments either side of the line will need to be cleared of vegetation, which Miss Lewis said would create a 75-metre wide “dead zone” where the line is built. The railway lines would take up 25 metres of room, and there needs to be at least 25 metres of room on either side, she said.

She was speaking after a delegation visited Kent to look at the impact the previous High Speed 1 project has had on the county.

For a full report on the visit, see Friday's Bucks Free Press.


Comments(23)

demoness says...
7:35am Thu 5 Aug 10

THIS is exactly what I have been banging on about since the wretched plans came to light.
Once these animals and plans have gone, that is it.... gone forever.
THE EARTH DOES NOT BELONG TO HUMANS!!! We share it with a lot of other living creatures to and we have NO RIGHT to destroy their habitats .

ferrellcat says...
8:41am Thu 5 Aug 10

outstanding natural beauty it may be but most of us never see it because its all fenced in and exclusive to those that own it.There are several wooded areas around here that you can no longer walk through.Maybe a train is what is needed to open up the countryside to us all.And on size its no bigger than a motorway and they seem to have an abundance of wild life.Its great to protect something but in this case it is just for the few

demoness says...
8:51am Thu 5 Aug 10

ferrellcat wrote:
outstanding natural beauty it may be but most of us never see it because its all fenced in and exclusive to those that own it.There are several wooded areas around here that you can no longer walk through.Maybe a train is what is needed to open up the countryside to us all.And on size its no bigger than a motorway and they seem to have an abundance of wild life.Its great to protect something but in this case it is just for the few
FC - you are missing the point.
This is not about what is good for humans - this is about other creatures who share this planet.
So we can't walk through - well good. That means they can live undisturbed.
Why destroy something that does not need to be destroyed?

tom.marlow says...
8:57am Thu 5 Aug 10

I've just got back from a 2000 km round trip using the HS1, French TGV and German ICE high speed networks. I hope the BBOWT won't revoke my membership :-)
.
I firmly believe that this that overall this will have caused far less harm to the environment than if I had flown or driven. You have to balance the local effects against the bigger picture.
.
I'm far from convinced that the proposed route is the best but we need a high speed rail network. Unless we can persuade people to travel less then the alternative is simply more roads and more flights.

ferrellcat says...
9:17am Thu 5 Aug 10

But some can walk through it and that is what this is about. protecting coralroot plant for those that can see it. And so protected we move our route to less attractive sites like say follow a motorway route. so now those near motorways have to put up with it.But thats okay as long as long as thumper and bam bam get a good nights sleep so they are bright eyed and bushy tailed for the exclusive few to see and shoot the next morning.This article is a red herring.its about protecting a way of life and very little to do with protecting wild life,to which I have found to be resilient and adaptable to most things

pennman says...
9:36am Thu 5 Aug 10

No-one wants to go to Birmingham anyway! We've already destroyed the landscape with the M40, so why not use it? It is a lot cheaper than using over-priced and unreliable trains.

tom.marlow says...
9:52am Thu 5 Aug 10

Its not about the the initial phase to Birmingham, its about building a network intot he northwest and scotland.

miccles says...
10:01am Thu 5 Aug 10

My personal view is i think "Heather Lewis", "should get a life", and start thinking of something that really matters, if all she can think about is a "rare coral root plant", and what are the animals going to do, then i feel sorry for her.

If this is going to happen, it will happen, where? when? who knows, its not going to be stopped just because somebody says it's going to upset the wildlife, who cares?

You can bet your bottom dollar, all these enviromental whingers, if this goes ahead, and they are still alive, sometime in their life they will use it, these sort of people are just hypocrites i'm afraid, and they know it.


and i know this is going to cause a storm by some.

Morag says...
10:09am Thu 5 Aug 10

tom.marlow wrote:
Its not about the the initial phase to Birmingham, its about building a network intot he northwest and scotland.
Yet the Government is seriously considering cancelling the £1bn electrification of the Great Western Line from Paddington to Swansea, which was announced by the previous Labour Government. Electrification is essential as a first building block towards high-speed rail provision.
~
A recent Greengauge21- sponsored KPMG assessment of the economic impacts of HS2 indicates that the scheme will have a net negative impact on the economies of Wales and south-west of England.
~
The last thing Cardiff and Bristol need is to see cities such as Leeds and Manchester getting even closer in journey times to London.

MCarey says...
10:46am Thu 5 Aug 10

if you want to go to scotland fly there, we are too small an island for such a huge unnecessary rail line, its a waste of money worry and ripping up of the supposed protected countryside oh and by the way the country cant even afford to build it

tom.marlow says...
10:49am Thu 5 Aug 10

miccles wrote:
My personal view is i think "Heather Lewis", "should get a life", and start thinking of something that really matters, if all she can think about is a "rare coral root plant", and what are the animals going to do, then i feel sorry for her. If this is going to happen, it will happen, where? when? who knows, its not going to be stopped just because somebody says it's going to upset the wildlife, who cares? You can bet your bottom dollar, all these enviromental whingers, if this goes ahead, and they are still alive, sometime in their life they will use it, these sort of people are just hypocrites i'm afraid, and they know it. and i know this is going to cause a storm by some.
Actually, I think Heather Lewis is just doing her job, which is to present the interests of the BBOWT and their nature reserves.
.
I've been a member of BBOWT for many years and think they do a fantastic job in preserving the environment in this area.
.
To dismiss people who care about these things as "environmental whingers" and "hypocrites" doesn't really contribute much to the debate.

tom.marlow says...
10:52am Thu 5 Aug 10

Morag wrote:
tom.marlow wrote: Its not about the the initial phase to Birmingham, its about building a network intot he northwest and scotland.
Yet the Government is seriously considering cancelling the £1bn electrification of the Great Western Line from Paddington to Swansea, which was announced by the previous Labour Government. Electrification is essential as a first building block towards high-speed rail provision. ~ A recent Greengauge21- sponsored KPMG assessment of the economic impacts of HS2 indicates that the scheme will have a net negative impact on the economies of Wales and south-west of England. ~ The last thing Cardiff and Bristol need is to see cities such as Leeds and Manchester getting even closer in journey times to London.
The tories don't exactly have much of a track record with railways :-)
.
I'd be surprised if any of it actually gets built

tom.marlow says...
10:54am Thu 5 Aug 10

MCarey wrote:
if you want to go to scotland fly there, we are too small an island for such a huge unnecessary rail line, its a waste of money worry and ripping up of the supposed protected countryside oh and by the way the country cant even afford to build it
yet we can afford to renew a fleet of submarines armed with nuclear missiles?

Arkwright says...
12:40pm Thu 5 Aug 10

pennman wrote:
No-one wants to go to Birmingham anyway! We've already destroyed the landscape with the M40, so why not use it? It is a lot cheaper than using over-priced and unreliable trains.
I very much doubt that anybody in Birmingham would be remotely interested in coming to High Wycombe either - hardly a centre of a retail nor decent nightlife. What a dump!

Malc London says...
12:49pm Thu 5 Aug 10

Why not build the Birmingham to Scotland bit first and see how it goes?

Once they realise it's a White Elephant perhaps they'll leave us in the South alone with our more than adequate transport systems.

J B Blackett says...
12:59pm Thu 5 Aug 10

Arkwright wrote:
pennman wrote:
No-one wants to go to Birmingham anyway! We've already destroyed the landscape with the M40, so why not use it? It is a lot cheaper than using over-priced and unreliable trains.
I very much doubt that anybody in Birmingham would be remotely interested in coming to High Wycombe either - hardly a centre of a retail nor decent nightlife. What a dump!
Thanks for those unnecessary gratuitous nasty and irrelevant remarks about Wycombe.
.
You obviously know nothing whatsoever about the subject ; not even the route or staging of the HS2.
.
Do research and reading before writing inappropriate abuse (if you must write it at all)

daemonite says...
1:20pm Thu 5 Aug 10

Right then J.B.Blackett, if you know so much on the pros and cons of this HS2 thing, just what are the advantages for it. Do those that are remotely interested in going to Birmingham get there a few minutes earlier, Big deal, Is life that important?

J B Blackett says...
2:01pm Thu 5 Aug 10

I was referring about yet another so predictable and so boring and repetitious Wycombe hater making irrelevant nasty remarks that have nothing to do with the HS2.
.
The HS2 is not planned to come through Wycombe (for topological and cost reasons). The nearest place would be The Chalfonts.
.
It is not going to happen and for the record I am against it for multiple reasons , stated on previous threads .
If you wish to find out about it , read the report (PDF). It's readily available so there's no point in me airing the biased arguments therein.
.
Regards

Slimster says...
3:03pm Thu 5 Aug 10

demoness wrote:
THIS is exactly what I have been banging on about since the wretched plans came to light.
Once these animals and plans have gone, that is it.... gone forever.
THE EARTH DOES NOT BELONG TO HUMANS!!! We share it with a lot of other living creatures to and we have NO RIGHT to destroy their habitats .
This kind of drama-queen effect doesn't wash with me. The house you live in was built on what was once a field or a forest. I agree that we need to minimise the impact on the environment, but we can't hold back development simply because it changes things. On one hand people don't want LHR to have another runway, OK, well what other communication links in place? A railway is a good alternative. Whereever it goes it will be through someone's backyard/rabbit burrow.
+
In Belgium and Germany their major rail and road links have special 'nature' bridges to allow animal and critter migration - they are basically extra wide bridges covered in soil/vegetation. We need more of this kind of thing over here.

Michael, HP7 says...
3:54pm Thu 5 Aug 10

Shed also a reptile's tear for the plight of the poor unsung Blue-Spotted Fork-Tongued Estate Agent Warbler, .

We are fearful for their sustainable nourishment and very survival, in these already challenging times.

For the unique very traditional Chiltern commission-lichen on which they feed is diminishing to precarious levels.

O! endangered species!

O!'Wildlife' in peril; indeed.

hondo says...
4:10pm Thu 5 Aug 10

Dear, dear, why are you all getting your knickers in a knot about something which isn't going to happen?
~
This is all about Tony and Gordon's graduates doing "planning", something for which they were obviously not "qualified", but for which they were subsidised by the tax-payer as part of the Labour Party's "eduction,education, education" policy to keep them from being registered as unemployed.
If there were a requirement, don't you think some-one might have done it before?
~
Communication is now done on the internet; no individual really needs to reduce the time between London and Birmingham on a train. (Please contradict and justify - or move house/job).
~
Optionally; get a life.

efbog says...
5:11pm Thu 5 Aug 10

Seems that either the BFP or Miss Lewis fail to mention which native wild animal numbers are dropping off. I was under the impression that many species were on the increase.
Most wild animals adapt to the changes in their surrounding you never know some might even benifit. But seriously do you ever think this rail link will ever be built?

demoness says...
9:49pm Thu 5 Aug 10

hondo wrote:
Dear, dear, why are you all getting your knickers in a knot about something which isn't going to happen?
~
This is all about Tony and Gordon's graduates doing "planning", something for which they were obviously not "qualified", but for which they were subsidised by the tax-payer as part of the Labour Party's "eduction,education, education" policy to keep them from being registered as unemployed.
If there were a requirement, don't you think some-one might have done it before?
~
Communication is now done on the internet; no individual really needs to reduce the time between London and Birmingham on a train. (Please contradict and justify - or move house/job).
~
Optionally; get a life.
I really hope you are right Hondo :(


Keepers Wood near Chesham, which is under threat from the planned High Speed 2 project. Photo courtesy Helen Walsh of Berks, Bucks and Oxen Wildlife Trust Keepers Wood near Chesham, which is under threat from the planned High Speed 2 project. Photo courtesy Helen Walsh of Berks, Bucks and Oxen Wildlife Trust

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses