News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


bux2

Your Area News by you News by email Contact Twitter facebook Blogs Topics Video


Hughenden Valley Residents' Association say it is not against affordable homes


THE chairman of Hughenden Valley Residents Association fears the democratic process is going “terribly wrong” as a row about affordable housing in the village continues to dominate parish council meetings.

He spoke to the BFP this week to “put the record straight” on where the association stands on affordable housing in the village.

A row has erupted in the Hughenden Parish about the process to find sites for rural affordable housing after a site in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, Green Belt and agricultural land was proposed in a previous survey.

Chairman of Hughenden Valley Residents Association (HVRA), Paul Cawte, said the association does not object to affordable housing but does object to it being built on AONB, green belt and working arable land.

He said the HVRA wants to “put the record straight” and there is “no anti-rural housing campaign in force by the HVRA and never has been.”

Mr Cawte said: “The HVRA decided early on when we first discovered this was the parish council plan we would not oppose the concept of affordable housing which we are in favour of in the right place.”

He said brownfield sites should be considered for this type of development and not sites like Warrendene Road which was put forward last time.

Mr Cawte said he was “astounded” to hear the parish council will not enter into further correspondence with residents on the matter unless they were legitimate freedom of information requests.

He said he believes it goes against the Nolan Report which outlines the standards in public life including accountability which says: "Holders of public office are accountable for their decisions and actions to the public and must submit themselves to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their office" and openness.

At a previous council meeting councillors agreed to not make personal email addresses public and for all correspondence to go through the clerk.

Mr Cawte said he was concerned by the lack of direct communication between parishioners and councillors.

He said: “This is going terribly wrong in terms of democracy.”

Mr Cawte added the vote of no confidence called at the annual parish council meeting in May has not been forgotten.

He said the vote “may not be legal” but it is “immoral” for the council not to listen ” and “the council should do right by the people it claims to represent.”

Lynn Turner, parish clerk, said: “The council said it will not correspond on past processes as the process is starting again.

“Therefore the survey is to find out the views of the parishioners. Why anyone would be against the survey, I’m not sure.”

Speaking about Mr Cawte’s concerns over emailsto the council going through her, she added: “That’s the correct way for going to the council. It’s the correct process across the country.

“It’s up to the clerk to disseminate the information to the council.”

In a letter to the Bucks Free Press written by Lynne Turner on behalf of Hughenden Parish Council in June it said: “The planning committee of Hughenden Valley Residents Association, on the other hand, has the freedom to run a campaign in ways which are not possible for Parish Councils.

"It is not elected, has no rules of engagement, and can say and do as it pleases, markedly different from the constraints rightly put on Parish Councils.”

She added: “The Parish Council hopes that the response rate in the Housing Needs Survey going out Parish wide in September will be high.

"It needs to hear from people interested in homes, those who favour the provision of affordable homes, and those against.”

Comments(6)

Turnerblindeye says...
2:03pm Thu 12 Aug 10

HVRA represent the views of the residents of Hughenden Valley in an honest and democratic way. I believe their aim is to protect the AONB area from development and I applaud the dedication they give unstintingly.

The Parish council on the other hand seem hell bent on ignoring concerns from the residents they purport to represent and are trying to railroad through a scheme which is flawed in every possible sense.

They refuse to listen to the people of the Parish and will stamp on anyone who tries to express an honest, informed and unbiased view. Undemocratic in every way.

How can a survey be honestly interpreted by one person and the contents kept confidential? Surely the whole processs should have been done independently by a third party with no bias?

This disgraceful debacle has now gone on for six months with a discredited PC who were elected unopposed or co-opted hanging on to office by their finger nails and a housing association who have yet to make a public comment despite many requests to do so.

Should the Shapps Proposal become law, I believe the 'silent majority' will reveal the true feeling of the people in this Parish

I M Amazed says...
3:30pm Thu 12 Aug 10

So HPC says "It needs to hear from people interested in homes, those who favour the provision of affordable homes, and those against.”

Does HPC want to hear if they favour homes built on AONB Green belt working agricultural land?

Let's wait for the Housing Needs Survey and see if that question is asked shall we?

Also let us see if what is meant by "affordable" is spelt out. (Only those with big wallets need take any notice.)

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze says...
4:30pm Thu 12 Aug 10

What the Parish Clerk says would be laughable if it wasn't so sad.
-
Of course no-one is against a survey. However, a survey which is manipulated with a twisted title, a prejudiced introduction and accompanied by a downright inaccurate set of answers to ‘FAQ’? Every person who believes in democracy is against that.
-
The people of Hughenden Parish want to be asked two straightforward questions:-

1) Are you in favour of genuinely affordable homes being built in Hughenden Parish?

2) If so, would you support the use of AONB GB land in the Parish for this purpose?

Without a doubt, the majority would say ‘yes’ to 1 and ‘no’ to 2.

And that is why HPC will not ask these questions. They will twist and manipulate the wording such that no emphatic answer can be given to 2. That is because it will force them to ditch plans for a Rural Exception Site Scheme and instead look at brownfield site schemes.
-
Whatever weasel-worded alternative they have planned they will ignore anyway. If they get a handful of people in the Parish expressing a desire for a house that is subjectively ‘affordable’ (in HPC’s terms ‘proof of need’) they will simply push ahead regardless of any Parishioner opinions expressed through the survey. That is why they railroaded through the resolution to do just that last week.
-
HPC is attempting confidence trickery of the highest order on its Parishioners. HVRA and the two dissenting councillors are attempting to hold them to account.

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze says...
5:46pm Thu 12 Aug 10

Mr Cawte said he was “astounded” to hear the parish council will not enter into further correspondence with residents on the matter unless they were legitimate freedom of information requests.
-
If he was astounded to hear that, then I hope he is sitting comfortably when he hears that the Parish Clerk is now refusing to respond to legitimate FoIA requests from Parishioners as well.
-
Not that there is anything for this council (which has not been secretive, obviously) to hide, obviously.

I M Amazed says...
6:48pm Fri 13 Aug 10

Refusing a legitimate FoI request? Phew, thats not funny, that is serious!

"There could be trouble ahead."

Turnerblindeye says...
7:46am Sat 14 Aug 10

I M Amazed wrote:
So HPC says "It needs to hear from people interested in homes, those who favour the provision of affordable homes, and those against.” Does HPC want to hear if they favour homes built on AONB Green belt working agricultural land? Let's wait for the Housing Needs Survey and see if that question is asked shall we? Also let us see if what is meant by "affordable" is spelt out. (Only those with big wallets need take any notice.)
No to the first question. They changed the wording.
Affordable? 25% deposit, an income of at least £40k and rent on the portion of the house you don't own.
Try Kingshill Grange. Its cheaper.


Paul Cawte and Dory Morgan Paul Cawte and Dory Morgan

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses