News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


bux2

Your Area News by you News by email Contact Twitter facebook Blogs Topics Video


Marlow woman disqualified from keeping rabbits avoids jail


A WOMAN who was disqualified from keeping rabbits has been given a suspended six month jail term and banned for life from owning the creatures after 33 were found in her garden.

Many of the animals found in the garden of Jacqueline Miles, 61, of Sunnybank, Marlow, were lacking enough food and clean water, Wycombe Magistrates Court heard.

Miles was sentenced after an investigation by the RSPCA and also faces a bill in excess of £5,000.

She was also threatened with being held in contempt of court for continuously interrupting the Magistrates and legal representatives.

Eight adult rabbits were found with no water at all, the court heard.

A video was played showing the state of the animals when they were found.

An officer narrating the recording said: “They are extremely nervous and just run away at any attempt to move them or handle them.”

Robert Borwick, prosecuting, said the rabbits “weren’t kept in proper condition, certainly the lack of water offered a clear danger and rabbits are particularly vulnerable to dehydration.”

One of the rabbits, shown in the video, drank for 40 seconds when presented with fresh water, he said.

Mr Borwick said she had ‘hoarded’ the creatures and also asked for a ban to extend to the numerous Guinea pigs she owned.

Chirs Prior, defending, said: “What I would highlight to you is that the animals we see by the two vets in their report are in agreement that the animals on a whole were in a reasonable condition, they weren’t overly suffering.

“They had been cared for to a reasonable standard.”

The animals were “very much loved” by Miles, he said, adding that items like wood left in their hutches to chew on to keep their teeth trimmed showed a level of care.

The loss of her elderly parents, particularly her mother most recently, had “had an impact on her”, Mr Prior said.

He added her “failings” were “innocent failings” and in relation to her original disqualification she “didn’t understand the circumstances and how the court process works”.

Magistrate Malcolm Peckham sentenced her to a six month jail term, suspended for 12 months, saying it was a “very serious matter”. She was given a supervision order, meaning she will report to a probation officer for six months.

As sentencing began Miles was told she would be held in contempt of court for speaking out of turn, having already been told to “be quiet” by Mr Peckham.

She was given a lifetime ban from keeping rabbits but this does not apply to her other animals which include a pony, numerous Guinea pigs and bantams.

These creatures had enough food and water, the court heard.

She must pay more than £5,000 in boarding fees incurred by the RSPCA.

It had appealed for costs of close to £10,000 which included investigative and legal costs.

RSPCA Chief Inspector Rob Skinner said Miles was given “every opportunity” to avoid court but the organisation were left without any option.

She will be offered help to meet the needs of her remaining pets, he said.

The seized rabbits were re-homed in March.

Comments(10)

pennman says...
12:52pm Mon 6 Sep 10

Another nutter like the one who put the cat in the bin.

MikeWil says...
9:27pm Mon 6 Sep 10

If the level of 'evidence' against this poor woman is that the animals ran away from strangers then virtually every parent of a toddler is guilty of cruelty!

The RSPCA are yet again persecuting the vulnerable. There is no evidence any of the animals have suffered and yet a cruel and vindictive ban has been imposed. Why?

And how in the world does anyone run up £5000 for boarding a few bunnies? Were they in gold plated burrows?

What is frightening is the magistrates swallowing this farce whole instead of throwing it out.

ivor says...
10:20pm Mon 6 Sep 10

While people are being robbed in their houses and mugged in the streets its reassuring to know the powers that be in the law courts are spending so much time worrying about a few rabbits....
~
Have you read Ivor’s blog today? Click on the “BLOGS” link at the top of the page.

Steve Totteridge Hill says...
10:25pm Mon 6 Sep 10

ivor wrote:
While people are being robbed in their houses and mugged in the streets its reassuring to know the powers that be in the law courts are spending so much time worrying about a few rabbits.... ~ Have you read Ivor’s blog today? Click on the “BLOGS” link at the top of the page.
I'll take mine with carrots and onions in a slow oven please...

demoness says...
1:44am Tue 7 Sep 10

ivor wrote:
While people are being robbed in their houses and mugged in the streets its reassuring to know the powers that be in the law courts are spending so much time worrying about a few rabbits....
~
Have you read Ivor’s blog today? Click on the “BLOGS” link at the top of the page.
Why do you think it is okay for animals to suffer at the hands of a human and the courts not to do anything about it?

The world doesn't belong just to humans you know and cruelty to any living creature should be never be tolerated.

MikeWil says...
2:00am Tue 7 Sep 10

demoness wrote:
ivor wrote:
While people are being robbed in their houses and mugged in the streets its reassuring to know the powers that be in the law courts are spending so much time worrying about a few rabbits....
~
Have you read Ivor’s blog today? Click on the “BLOGS” link at the top of the page.
Why do you think it is okay for animals to suffer at the hands of a human and the courts not to do anything about it?

The world doesn't belong just to humans you know and cruelty to any living creature should be never be tolerated.
What cruelty?

They couldn't find any cruelty other than the animals fled from strange humans!

Two vets said the animals were not suffering!

But a uniformed charity worker claims they are suffering when he approaches them with a video camera.

Demoness, have you never walked down the street and seen a chugger and thought I'm going to cross over to avoid them? Perhaps that is what the rabbits were doing?

demoness says...
6:11am Tue 7 Sep 10

Hi Mike.
I don't know what a chugger is.:(

There was video evidence - as far as I am concerned that is enough.
But that is not the issue here - Ivor was saying that it is only a few rabbits and his usual DM talk about muggers in the street etc.
No doubt he thought that the horses who suffered in Amersham were not worth the bother either.

katodeza says...
10:56am Tue 7 Sep 10

To deprive an animal of water is very cruel and can cause kidney damage -
to all you wisecrackers- try doing without fluids for a day and see how you feel.

polandking says...
11:40am Tue 7 Sep 10

She can keep rampant rabbit instead it dont need food or water and she get more pleasure keeping it.

MikeWil says...
2:31pm Tue 7 Sep 10

katodeza wrote:
To deprive an animal of water is very cruel and can cause kidney damage -
to all you wisecrackers- try doing without fluids for a day and see how you feel.
Who said they had gone without water for a day?

Some rabbits didn't have water at the time of the raid. Their water containers could have been being refilled at the time.

Had they been kept without water constantly then clearly there would have been some medical evidence in the state of the rabbits.

There was none.

Most of the article is taken up with emotive RSPCA suggestions, not facts.


Wycombe Magistrates' Court Wycombe Magistrates gave Jacqueline Miles a suspended jail sentence

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses