'Nanny state flood sign blots out famous view'

Cllr Fiona Hewer Cllr Fiona Hewer

A NEW 'nanny state' flood sign has blotted a beautiful view encapsulated in a Stanley Spencer painting and created an eyesore, a fuming professor has blasted.

Paul Strzelecki , 55, has labelled the mounted warning notice by Cookham Moor pointless.

The consultant and visiting professor at Manchester University said it was a waste of money.

Prof Strzelecki, of Berrys Road, Cookham, said: "Right in the middle of a beautiful view which Stanley Spencer painted there's this stupid modern sign with no purpose whatsoever.

"It's an absolute eyesore, it blinds you at night, it's a load of rubbish and you can't read it when you go past it.

"If you're going through the area you will know it's flooded, won't you, without a sign.

"If you are daft enough to drive your car into the water then its only your car at risk not yourself and frankly let's see more personal responsibility.

"There are too many signs in our nanny state."

There are two of the signs, installed by the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead on request by Cookham Parish Council's flood committee.

Cllr Fiona Hewer, committee chairman, said:"The purpose of the signs is to try to keep the Moor road open as long as possible in the event of a flood. If that road floods and water is shallow, we want people to keep driving if it's safe for that to happen."

The climate change scientist said: "They are also there as road side markers so when it is flooded people know where it is and don't drive into the ditch.

"The Royal borough consulted with the National Trust, who said what they thought was appropriate.

"Personally I don't think they're out of keeping but if a lot of residents think they are too much we can take them out and slot them in when we've got a flood warning but that'd be extra work.

"We'll listen to people's concerns if they don't like the look of them but they are an important and helpful flood preparedness measure for Cookham so I wouldn't want to get rid of them all together."

Comments(6)

Marmite XO says...
10:28am Sat 30 Jun 12

Is he a professor of incredibly tedious and pointless incidents that only he cares about?

Slacker says...
2:09pm Sat 30 Jun 12

Well I think the safety of the public far outweighs that of a view somebody painted many years ago.

It is not nanny state putting a sign up either. Imagine the outrage from the public if the council knew there was a flood risk and didn't put up signs? They would soon be quickly sued. Seems they cannot win either way.

Sorry but I am with the council on this. Parts of Cookham are at risk of flooding and people should be aware of this.

bluebanana says...
5:53pm Sat 30 Jun 12

People need rescuing from cars that get caught in flood water more often than you'd think. This diverts emergency services away from saving lives or helping the vulnerable people in our community due to people's stupudity at driving through flood water.

I like how he included his title & profession in his story. No doubt to try to impress a few people into thinking he knows what he's talking about. Well it doesn't wash with me. As I've seen many times over the years, academic qualifications count for nothing towards common sense.

Edgar Brooks says...
11:24am Sun 1 Jul 12

You're missing the point; he's a climate change scientist, which = global warming, which means it'll never rain, so the road will never flood (with tongue firmly in cheek.)

washondo says...
2:53pm Mon 2 Jul 12

So many critics - so much time.

Agniesca says...
4:47pm Tue 3 Jul 12

being gay is neither good nor bad, and is irelevant when discussing marriage, since the procreation of children to ensure the continuance of the human race is the first reason for people getting married.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree