More than 100 car tyres stolen (From Bucks Free Press)

"PC Hayley McEvoy from High Wycombe police station said: “Due to the amount of items stolen I believe that the offenders used a vehicle."

LOL it takes a Police Person to deduce that!!!!

"PC Hayley McEvoy from High Wycombe police station said: “Due to the amount of items stolen I believe that the offenders used a vehicle."

Really?

Don't fancy your promotion chances.

With what they charge for tyres isn't it a case of what goes around comes around, they've been robbing people for years,

QUOTE: “Due to the amount of items stolen I believe that the offenders used a vehicle.”
~
I'll go one better, if they stole 100 tyres I suspect it could have been a large van or lorry that was involved and probably not a small sized super-mini car.
~
With powers of deduction like that do you think I would make it to Chief Inspector?
~
Have you read Ivor’s blog today? Click on the “BLOGS” link at the top of the page.

cripes if they didnt use a large vehicle to move them they wood have been very tired after moving over a hundred tyres, and now that the police forces finest hayley mcevoy is on to them by knowing they used a vehical they better keep a low profile........

Couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch of rip off merchants! Oh Hayley! Anyone noticed suspicious activity in Desborough? She's joking, right?

I bet they are wheely fed up - in fact I would say they are sick and tyred..

miccles wrote:
"PC Hayley McEvoy from High Wycombe police station said: “Due to the amount of items stolen I believe that the offenders used a vehicle."

Really?

Don't fancy your promotion chances.

No doubt she will be a chief super in a couple of years, usually someone with that kind of blinding intelligence who gets promoted..

I Love Ivor wrote:
"PC Hayley McEvoy from High Wycombe police station said: “Due to the amount of items stolen I believe that the offenders used a vehicle." LOL it takes a Police Person to deduce that!!!!

That did make me chuckle actully. well they were hardly going to leave with that amount of tyres under there arms are they ? ha ha

Can anyone else picture Inspector Clouseau making that statement?

tomcat wrote:
Can anyone else picture Inspector Clouseau making that statement?

;-)

tomcat wrote:
Can anyone else picture Inspector Clouseau making that statement?

Brilliant!!

mother123 wrote:
cripes if they didnt use a large vehicle to move them they wood have been very tired after moving over a hundred tyres, and now that the police forces finest hayley mcevoy is on to them by knowing they used a vehical they better keep a low profile........

As people who mock the officer quoted in this article, many of you seem to have quite appalling spelling - which somewhat detracts from your position to laugh, really!
"wood have" isn't even close, and what the hell is a "vehical", mother123? I mean, that word is in the article to begin with!
And cocobay, I think you mean "actually" and "under THEIR arms".

This is GCSE English. People who laugh when they really oughtn't irritate me.

osmith wrote:

mother123 wrote:
cripes if they didnt use a large vehicle to move them they wood have been very tired after moving over a hundred tyres, and now that the police forces finest hayley mcevoy is on to them by knowing they used a vehical they better keep a low profile........

As people who mock the officer quoted in this article, many of you seem to have quite appalling spelling - which somewhat detracts from your position to laugh, really!
"wood have" isn't even close, and what the hell is a "vehical", mother123? I mean, that word is in the article to begin with!
And cocobay, I think you mean "actually" and "under THEIR arms".

This is GCSE English. People who laugh when they really oughtn't irritate me.

"This is GCSE English. People who laugh when they really oughtn't irritate me.”

For someone who is so picky on other people's english grammar, don't you think your sentence would have been better to read

"This is GCSE English. People who laugh when they really should not, irritate me"


Even tho "oughtn't", is used, if you are going to use it, do it properley.

Do you really believe that poor PC Hayley McEvoy has enough time on her hands to write a statement for the press as well as deal with the the abundance of jobs in High Wycombe. They have PRESS OFFICERS for writing these articles which means they have no or little input to what is written.

THE POLICE ARE ALSO CONCERNED ABOUT A LARGE NUMBER OF HOLES APPEARING ALL OVER BUCKINGHAMSHIRE'S ROADS.
A POLICE SPOKESWOMAN SAID "WE ARE LOOKING INTO THEM....."
BUCKS HAS THE WORST ROADS IN THE COUNTRY....ITS NO WONDER THAT THERE IS A HUGE DEMAND FOR TYRES....
JUDGE

miccles wrote:

osmith wrote:

mother123 wrote:
cripes if they didnt use a large vehicle to move them they wood have been very tired after moving over a hundred tyres, and now that the police forces finest hayley mcevoy is on to them by knowing they used a vehical they better keep a low profile........

As people who mock the officer quoted in this article, many of you seem to have quite appalling spelling - which somewhat detracts from your position to laugh, really!
"wood have" isn't even close, and what the hell is a "vehical", mother123? I mean, that word is in the article to begin with!
And cocobay, I think you mean "actually" and "under THEIR arms".

This is GCSE English. People who laugh when they really oughtn't irritate me.

"This is GCSE English. People who laugh when they really oughtn't irritate me.”

For someone who is so picky on other people's english grammar, don't you think your sentence would have been better to read

"This is GCSE English. People who laugh when they really should not, irritate me"


Even tho "oughtn't", is used, if you are going to use it, do it properley.

Ennuff alredy.

tomcat wrote:
Can anyone else picture Inspector Clouseau making that statement?

that's chief inspector thank you.....:)