Street lights to be switched off permanently at 40 sites

STREET lights will be permanently removed from 40 sites around Bucks after a trial - including on seven roads where accidents during darkness have gone up.

Three sections of the A413 and two parts of the A40 will go dark permanently despite small increases in collisions during the three year experiment.

The Wycombe Road (C100), running from the M40 Handy Cross roundabout junction to Marlow Bottom, and the A416 Amersham to Chesham are the other sites where crashes went up but will lose their illuminations nonetheless.

The lights were turned off to save money and energy.

Buckinghamshire County Council said its trial saved £260,818 in energy costs, carbon emissions savings of 1,625 tonnes of CO2 and reduced energy consumption of 3,108,797kWh.

Removing the lights will now cost about £850,000.

In the long run, however, officials said they would be saving about £4million in maintenance costs.

Cllr Peter Hardy, Cabinet Member for Transport, explained why lights are going for good at the seven sites where there has been a rise in accidents during darkness.

He said: "Each collision taking place at these sites was fully investigated with all contributory factors being carefully considered before the recommendations were made to me. It was apparent that the lack of lighting was not a factor in these collisions."

The council's study showed that the number of recorded injury collisions at the switch off sites during darkness, when averaged across all sites, have reduced by 26 per cent.

Collisions increased at 11 sites, reduced at 26 sites and there was no change at the other nine sites.

The other four sites where crashes went up will have their lights put back on.

There were 259 responses to the consultation on the switch off, which officials described as 'wide ranging'.

The report stated: "Many respondents confirmed their support for the aims of the trial, namely to reduce costs, energy use and light pollution.

"Other respondents reiterated concerns or opposition previously expressed either about the trial generally or about the impact of the trial at specific locations.

"There is no consensus for or against the trial and this supports the decision to look at each site on its own merits before deciding what the final decision is at each trial site."

The council estimates it will save £435,429 in energy costs between now and 2016.

Work to implement the switch off begins later this year.

Comments (8)

9:58am Sun 26 Aug 12

A VOTER says...

The report above says, "Removing the lights will now cost about £850,000"

Then surely it would be cheaper to leave the lights where they are. This way, in years to come, should it be decided that removal of lights has ended up causing more deaths, then the lights can just be switched on again.

Come on BCC, don't be even more stupid with our taxes. Think about it properly.
The report above says, "Removing the lights will now cost about £850,000" Then surely it would be cheaper to leave the lights where they are. This way, in years to come, should it be decided that removal of lights has ended up causing more deaths, then the lights can just be switched on again. Come on BCC, don't be even more stupid with our taxes. Think about it properly. A VOTER

10:31am Sun 26 Aug 12

Good Life says...

So human life is cheap as far as BCC are concerned then!
So human life is cheap as far as BCC are concerned then! Good Life

11:10am Sun 26 Aug 12

Mr Methane says...

The fencing at the Marlow bypass junction with Little Marlow Road cost £14,000 so £850,000 is surely a bargain. BCC must be living in some sort of financial dreamworld.
The fencing at the Marlow bypass junction with Little Marlow Road cost £14,000 so £850,000 is surely a bargain. BCC must be living in some sort of financial dreamworld. Mr Methane

11:35am Sun 26 Aug 12

BOGITS says...

Seems this is a exercise to keep the BCC in work so as not to cut jobs? This would keep the workmen at work and so BCC can justify their stupid cost cutting exercise and spend £850,000 of the council tax payers money? I believe drivers shouldnt be on the road if they cant see in the dark? Another cost cutting exercise BCC would be to stop putting traffic lights where we done need'em. Sitting at Traffic Lights is causing CO2 emmisions and they should start looking at this? Look towards Europe and their traffic system in towns and you will see they dont have numerous street lights and traffic signals, they seem to manage?
Seems this is a exercise to keep the BCC in work so as not to cut jobs? This would keep the workmen at work and so BCC can justify their stupid cost cutting exercise and spend £850,000 of the council tax payers money? I believe drivers shouldnt be on the road if they cant see in the dark? Another cost cutting exercise BCC would be to stop putting traffic lights where we done need'em. Sitting at Traffic Lights is causing CO2 emmisions and they should start looking at this? Look towards Europe and their traffic system in towns and you will see they dont have numerous street lights and traffic signals, they seem to manage? BOGITS

9:29pm Sun 26 Aug 12

tigeran says...

"The council estimates it will save £435,429 in energy costs between now and 2016."

£435,000 will just about see 10 or so feckless families ok for a year, and how many of those are in Wycombe alone?!!!!!!........
Puts this drop in the ocean in perspective.........
........
"The council estimates it will save £435,429 in energy costs between now and 2016." £435,000 will just about see 10 or so feckless families ok for a year, and how many of those are in Wycombe alone?!!!!!!........ Puts this drop in the ocean in perspective......... ........ tigeran

5:17pm Mon 27 Aug 12

OneArmJack says...

Good. Personally I'd like to see all lights switched off after midnight so that the county isn't bathed in a orange glow, but I can understand the opposition to that.
Good. Personally I'd like to see all lights switched off after midnight so that the county isn't bathed in a orange glow, but I can understand the opposition to that. OneArmJack

5:46pm Mon 27 Aug 12

Plus ça change... says...

It is remarkable in this supposedly advanced technological world that we don't have lights that come on as we drive past and switch if there is a gap in the traffic....
It is remarkable in this supposedly advanced technological world that we don't have lights that come on as we drive past and switch if there is a gap in the traffic.... Plus ça change...

6:39pm Mon 27 Aug 12

bluebanana says...

Why do roads need lights anyway? Cars are fitted with powerful lights to illuminate the road ahead when it's dark. Only in residential areas street lights are obviously useful to pedestrians who generally aren't fitted with lights. Well done BCC (for a change!).
Why do roads need lights anyway? Cars are fitted with powerful lights to illuminate the road ahead when it's dark. Only in residential areas street lights are obviously useful to pedestrians who generally aren't fitted with lights. Well done BCC (for a change!). bluebanana

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree