Concern at Green Belt changes

Concern at Green Belt changes Concern at Green Belt changes

CONCERNS have been raised by environmental groups at Government plans to make it easier to build on Green Belt land.

The proposals were made earlier this week by Chancellor George Osborne, who said they would boost economic growth.

The overhaul of the national planning process would give councils the power to approve development of Green Belt areas so long as another piece of land the same size was then reclassified as Green Belt.

Current planning regulations severely limit what can be built on Green Belt land, with much of Buckinghamshire being affected by the policy.

Mr Osborne's plans are set to be put in front of MPs next month - but in the meantime green groups have hit out at the proposals.

Paul Miner, Senior Planning Officer for the Campaign for the Protection of Rural England, said: "The Green Belt is the most popular planning policy in England and the envy of the world. It helps regenerate our cities and stops them sprawling into rural areas. As a result, no one is ever too far from true, green English countryside.

"In times of economic slowdown, politicians can sometimes be tempted by the false promise of an easy construction boom. But destroying the countryside is not the path to lasting economic prosperity.  Sustainable economic improvement can only come from the sort of urban regeneration that has already done much to rejuvenate many of our largest cities.

"Ministers have consistently maintained that they value the Green Belt and want to see it protected. Now is the time to put these words into action."

Any changes could seriously impact on the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, which covers a large proportion of the county.

Colin White, planning officer at the Chilterns Conservation Board, said: "If it will impact on the AONB, we would be significantly concerned by that, particularly if any development was of a major kind. Even small developments can be major in the AONB.

"We are mindful of the implications on the AONB and we would be worried if Green Belt policy was relaxed to allow significant changes."

Mr Osborne said on the BBC's Andrew Marr Show this week: "I think we can speed up planning. It is absolutely ludicrous that it takes years to get planning decisions in this country. You can get much faster decisions on the continent, let alone in countries like China.

"This country, in the current economic environment, cannot afford to wait years for development."

Comments (5)

8:18am Wed 5 Sep 12

townraider says...

Great news.
Lets reclassify the last spaces in High Wycombe as green spaces and allow the rural areas the opportunity to build sustainable homes in the villages and turn their communities into thriving areas.
Great news. Lets reclassify the last spaces in High Wycombe as green spaces and allow the rural areas the opportunity to build sustainable homes in the villages and turn their communities into thriving areas. townraider

8:46am Wed 5 Sep 12

Darren Hayday says...

One minute this Government tells us that they are all for protecting the greenbelt - then they change their mind and so on.

We have a beautiful countryside in the UK - why destroy it?

Why can’t we find other ways of building homes?
One minute this Government tells us that they are all for protecting the greenbelt - then they change their mind and so on. We have a beautiful countryside in the UK - why destroy it? Why can’t we find other ways of building homes? Darren Hayday

11:05am Wed 5 Sep 12

Kania 2000 says...

I have to agree our planning system is too slow and cumbersome. Its administered by those who only apply their own interpritations of the large amount of rules. This in many cases prevents small changes that would allowing many busineses to keep up with the times and remaim competitive and profitable.
But then I expect that everyone who has been involved with any planning authority feels that the planners are anti any planning.
The planning is in a mess and requires a seriously modernised approach from all concerned.
I have to agree our planning system is too slow and cumbersome. Its administered by those who only apply their own interpritations of the large amount of rules. This in many cases prevents small changes that would allowing many busineses to keep up with the times and remaim competitive and profitable. But then I expect that everyone who has been involved with any planning authority feels that the planners are anti any planning. The planning is in a mess and requires a seriously modernised approach from all concerned. Kania 2000

6:33am Thu 6 Sep 12

demoness the second says...

townraider wrote:
Great news.
Lets reclassify the last spaces in High Wycombe as green spaces and allow the rural areas the opportunity to build sustainable homes in the villages and turn their communities into thriving areas.
There are sustainable homes in the villages already and the surrounding countryside - the trouble is, they do not belong to humans and therefore the residents have no rights to say whether they want to be bulldozed and destroyed or not.
You ( as usual) talk the same small minded insular tosh.
Wycombe is not the centre of the universe( bit of a reminder there).
[quote][p][bold]townraider[/bold] wrote: Great news. Lets reclassify the last spaces in High Wycombe as green spaces and allow the rural areas the opportunity to build sustainable homes in the villages and turn their communities into thriving areas.[/p][/quote]There are sustainable homes in the villages already and the surrounding countryside - the trouble is, they do not belong to humans and therefore the residents have no rights to say whether they want to be bulldozed and destroyed or not. You ( as usual) talk the same small minded insular tosh. Wycombe is not the centre of the universe( bit of a reminder there). demoness the second

10:23am Thu 6 Sep 12

smuggles says...

Darren Hayday wrote:
One minute this Government tells us that they are all for protecting the greenbelt - then they change their mind and so on. We have a beautiful countryside in the UK - why destroy it? Why can’t we find other ways of building homes?
How about you make a suggestion? One minute you complain about developing urban areas and the strain it will put on infrastructure, the next you complain about development of rural areas. Is it any wonder you are a laughing stock?
[quote][p][bold]Darren Hayday[/bold] wrote: One minute this Government tells us that they are all for protecting the greenbelt - then they change their mind and so on. We have a beautiful countryside in the UK - why destroy it? Why can’t we find other ways of building homes?[/p][/quote]How about you make a suggestion? One minute you complain about developing urban areas and the strain it will put on infrastructure, the next you complain about development of rural areas. Is it any wonder you are a laughing stock? smuggles

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree