Booker site 'too small' for new airport plan

Booker site 'too small' for new airport plan Booker site 'too small' for new airport plan

BOOKER airfield is too small to be considered as a potential site for a proposed new four-runway airport west of Heathrow say local aviation experts.

An Independent on Sunday exclusive claims a £60bn British business consortium with Chinese backing is eyeing-up potential sites 30 minutes to the west of London to rival or even replace Heathrow.

But David Phillips, managing director of Booker Aircraft Operations, says Booker or neighbouring White Waltham won’t be on their radar – because they are too small.

He said: “For something to happen on the scale that’s being talked about you would need somewhere at least four times the size of us.

“We have a 700m runway here and it has to be 3,000metres long. “We are talking about something the size of a town. We are talking about a bit of real estate the size of High Wycombe itself.

“It’s not a business aspiration of ours and I think it’s pie in the sky.

Booker Aircraft Operations lease the site from Wycombe District Council and are hoping to renew it when the current lease expires in 2014.

He added: “From our perspective if anyone is thinking about it, it is the first we know about it.”

Meanwhile, Mike Post, a former airline pilot from Marlow says that even if Booker was big enough the typography would rule it out.

He said: “It’s too hilly.”

The airport hunters’ criteria state that they want a flat site, accessible by road and rail and within half an hour of London.

Both he and Mr Phillips suspect Greenham Common, the site for the peace camps in the 1980s, is most like to be considered along with Upper Heyford, the former military base near Bicester, for any ‘new Heathrow’.

But ex-pilot Mr Post believes the best solution of all would be to resurrect the plans for a third runway at Heathrow, which the Conservatives opposed in 2010 but are considering again now. He said: “My view is that the third runway at Heathrow ought to go ahead. There’s room for it there and it was going to happen there for years and years.

“If you started from scratch you wouldn’t choose Heathrow but it is already there and West London and the Heathrow corridor relies on it being there.”

And he says putting it there would only have minimal impact here because the proposal is for a northerly runway.

Comments(10)

Mutley says...
12:12pm Fri 14 Sep 12

"Meanwhile, Mike Post, a former airline pilot from Marlow says that even if Booker was big enough the typography would rule it out."

The typography eh? Is Booker in the wrong typeface? Is the linespacing incorrect? Does the general design of the printed page fail BAE's criteria for a new airport.

I think the word you're looking for is "topography". But your proofreaders probably knew that!

church11 says...
12:29pm Fri 14 Sep 12

Make it a skydive dropzone :-) pleeeease

Dr Truth says...
12:33pm Fri 14 Sep 12

It's mindblowing that the BFP even felt the need to ask the question, I bet the guys at BAO had a good chuckle after they'd put the phone down.

thethe says...
2:04pm Fri 14 Sep 12

How could Bicester be the new Heathrow? Do we need HS3 to run high speed services from Bicester to London. This story is a non story. Boris Island is more likely to happen than this

realist_highwycombe says...
2:10pm Fri 14 Sep 12

I did laugh when I saw this headline - seriously BFP what is all this nonsense about!?

Anyone with a brain cell would know that Booker is too small for almost anything!

It's a great little site which does well for the purpose it serves but anything else is laughable!

Darren Hayday says...
2:33pm Fri 14 Sep 12

I can picture it now... Jumbo Jets landing and taking off over our back gardens! ;op

J B Blackett says...
8:23pm Fri 14 Sep 12

realist_highwycombe wrote:
I did laugh when I saw this headline - seriously BFP what is all this nonsense about!?

Anyone with a brain cell would know that Booker is too small for almost anything!

It's a great little site which does well for the purpose it serves but anything else is laughable!
Did you know there used to be a Little Booker and a Great Booker., but Little Booker did disappear about the time of the Black Death.
.
And over the years the 'Great' disappeared as it wasn't needed as there was nothing Little to compare it to.
.
However although Great Booker Airport sounds good , it's not viable , not financially sound or even practical.

BOOKERite says...
10:17pm Fri 14 Sep 12

It's almost as daft an idea as it was to suggest puting a rugby stadium on the airfield!

YorksDavey says...
10:40pm Sat 15 Sep 12

lol, somebody having delusions of grandeur over there? New 4 runway airport indeed. 4 brain cells more like.

TheHorsesMouth says...
10:31am Mon 17 Sep 12

Have you heard about the new Jumbo designed around the Harrier airframe for VTOL?
...
I'll leave that one for re-use on April 1st,....

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree