£30m sports centre plans 'short sighted' (From Bucks Free Press)
Send your news, photos and videos by texting bucksfreepress to 80360 or email
£30m leisure centre plans branded 'short sighted' over Olympic boosted sports
1:29pm Tuesday 2nd October 2012 in News By James Nadal
Water polo - one of the sports the sub aqua club says is not being catered for
PLANS for the proposed new £30m Handy Cross leisure complex have been branded 'short sighted' for not catering for minority sports boosted by the Olympics.
Council chiefs were criticised last night for not better accommodating sports enjoying a higher profile after London 2012, such as water polo.
The High Wycombe Sub Aqua Club has been campaigning for like for like facilities at the leisure centre to secure its future but shifted the attention to other minority sports with a question last night.
Clive Bennett, representing the club, told the Wycombe District Council meeting: “Synchronised swimming, men’s and women’s water polo, and platform diving are all sports with higher profiles and potential as a result of London 2012.
“Yet existing clubs and facilities for these sports throughout Buckinghamshire are currently minimal or non-existent.
“A design policy for the new aquatic facilities at Handy Cross derived principally from current usage statistics will inevitably prove short-sighted and inaccurate.
“Sir Steve Redgrave credits the existing centre for the start it gave him, but his success since 1978, transforming the popularity and availability of rowing to a wider community, exemplifies my point.”
He asked for assurances that all aquatic sports would be catered for, and not just swimming.
Deputy Leader Cllr Arif Hussain, who has been leading on the sports centre plan, said designs are based on extensive consultation.
He said: “There has been no demonstrable demand for synchronised swimming or polo.”
Mr Bennett asked if Sport England has been sought out for grants and Cllr Hussain said he would enquire but did not believe any attempts for such money had been successful. He said there was no external funding.
The sub aqua club also questioned at the meeting why plans for various sports including their own, agreed by councillors, had been allowed to be changed by officers.
Cllr Hussain said: "Initially the plans were indicative of how the facilities mix could be accommodated within the building's footprint.”
The proposal has gone through a design development stage and soft market testing with six leading leisure operators, he said, explaining: "They told us what we were doing needs to be changed."
The sub aqua club's concerns centre around the depth of the new pool.
Cllr Hussain said the sub aqua group, which has been based at Handy Cross for 37 years, was being accommodated in the new centre but the council has a limited budget.
Comments(8)
rem708
says...
2:04pm Tue 2 Oct 12
It should be round the other way. If you don't have the space for these other sports to start then they will never be given a chance to be adopted in the district. Extra adaptable space should be made available to suite the sports which start to thrive.
"...designs are based on extensive consultation" Well the consultation fell at the first hurdle because it failed to include the sports already there. One really has to question the quality of the consultation.
YorksDavey
says...
8:26pm Tue 2 Oct 12
yog
says...
10:37pm Tue 2 Oct 12
Councillors agreed one set of plans.
Officers (Or one particular officer) settles on another plan.
Yet again it looks like the officers run the Council.
gpn01
says...
11:50pm Tue 2 Oct 12
Kania 2000
says...
9:25am Wed 3 Oct 12
Come on WDC stop messing about and find a site for a modern upto date sports facility or at least let someone else build one.
Too many opportunities pass WDC by. Time to put some proper plans together for the people of High Wycombe!
gpn01
says...
9:52am Wed 3 Oct 12
Kania 2000 wrote:There already is a great site for a sports centre - it's called Handy Cross. Unfortunately it has a sports centre and running track that would need to be relocated in order to build a completely newer, and presumably smaller, facility. Oh, and because it'd cost £30M, they need to figure out a way of raising the finances and have decided that the best way to do this is to sell off the land of the existing site....thereby 'justifying' the need to find another site for the running track. Unfortunately no one seems to be promoting the idea of redeveloping the existing facility. Suppose that's simply not a grand enough vision?
This will be yet another fine mess. Narrow minds with little vision of what the public will need. Just keep selling off the sports grounds and fragment the facilities all over South Bucks. Come on WDC stop messing about and find a site for a modern upto date sports facility or at least let someone else build one. Too many opportunities pass WDC by. Time to put some proper plans together for the people of High Wycombe!
williamjames
says...
1:21pm Wed 3 Oct 12
What about provission for other spports, e.g. hockey or do the officers who allocate pitches on the Rye only know about football?
gpn01
says...
1:34pm Wed 3 Oct 12
williamjames wrote:As Councillors are elected representatives, rather than employees, then they're all "part-time". Hasn't that always been the case? For the two Deputies question, I thought that it was a rotational appointment, whereby there's only one serving as deputy at any one time. That's actually a good way of sharing the load better and ensuring a wider experience base, rather than just having a single person as deputy. Having seen how much time the councillors put in to their various roles I think it's a rather harsh, and inaccurate, judgement to construe their actions as "lazy". The point about officers only knowing about football is unfounded too....do you know how much time they spent trying to justify a case for a rugby club last year?
Officers running the Council. What a surprise! But what do you expect of a leader who is, at best, part time? The two deputies lack vision and experience, Why two when previous administrations only had one deputy. Is the Leader not up to it or is he just lazy and delegates his work to others? What about provission for other spports, e.g. hockey or do the officers who allocate pitches on the Rye only know about football?
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with