Council merger unaffordable, says Alex Collingwood, leader of Wycombe District Council

Alex Collingwood, leader of Wycombe District Council, said the initial start up costs for a merger made it unaffordable currently Alex Collingwood, leader of Wycombe District Council, said the initial start up costs for a merger made it unaffordable currently

HOPES of reviving plans for a radical council merger which could potentially save taxpayers millions of pounds have been dashed.

A plea to set up an all party group at Wycombe District Council to further investigate the possibility of a unitary authority has been dismissed.

Council leader Alex Collingwood believes such a move would only bring “false hope” that it could happen and said that as things stand a merger is unaffordable.

Cllr Alan Turner appealed at a public meeting for the Conservative administration to look seriously into the idea.

A report in 2006 stated that rolling together the five existing district councils and Buckinghamshire County Council into one could have saved an estimated £35m a year.

Earlier this year, the BFP reported on a report previously unseen publicly, which found a plan to cut top bosses at three district councils - Wycombe, South Bucks and Chiltern – could have saved Wycombe taxpayers £1.1m per year.

The three authorities were looking last year at saving money by sharing a chief executive and other managers.

The two authorities went ahead with the changes without WDC, which said at the time the report was finished, many questions remained over the untested structure.

At the October 1 meeting Cllr Turner called on the Tory run council to create a cross-party group to investigate a merger.

He said: “This first, very small step, which would cost relatively little should be a no brainer given the potential long term savings that might be achieved. Savings that could help fund front line services, major growth projects, keep council tax to a minimum, and who knows, repair our roads.”

Cllr Collingwood repeated his stance from earlier this year, saying the immediate costs of making the changes made it “simply unaffordable” and would have to be funded by taxpayers.

He said: "On that basis we are not prepared to divert resources for any issue which the government have made clear is not on their agenda."

He said it would mean increased costs for all taxpayers.

Cllr Turner was unimpressed, saying it was 'incredible' that the council was working on sharing waste management with Chiltern District Council yet would not look further at this idea which he claimed could save even more cash.

“How can you justify looking at making savings in one area but you are not prepared to take a small step looking into saving any more money?” he asked.

Cllr Collingwood said: "It may seem like a great idea but the reality is very clear, the costs will outweigh the benefits and in reality will distract us from improving services and the quality of life in our district.

“In my mind, at this stage, I think it gives people false hope going down that road.”

WDC and BCC have made significant cuts in their management structure in recent years as they aim to reduce costs.

Comments(8)

Darren Hayday says...
9:34am Wed 10 Oct 12

I'm sorry to say that the Tories will not give up their jobs just like that...

At the moment, they hold the power and the cabinets for both BCC and WDC.

It is funny that many other Councils around the Country had joined together giving good value to their constituents and at the time when there were extra good financial incentives (i.e. from the last Labour government) to make the mergers - both WDC and BCC dragged their feet - only to save their own jobs.

Why do the x3 local district Councils not work together in a 'Framework agreement' if they don’t already - or why can they not put the people before their own jobs?

This is democracy for you folks...

They will be nice to you come election time, then patronise you and tell you anything just to keep themselves in a job (or two or 3!! at the same time) when it’s not election time.
It’s also funny that you see major road repairs taking place just before County elections as well..

ShopFloorSteward says...
11:23am Wed 10 Oct 12

Something that frustrates many of us working for the Councils is that the discussion about Unitaries is always "all or nothing". The BFP Poll falls into this same trap - what about a second poll asking "If there was going to be a Unitary Authority should it be "All of Bucks" or should it be 2 Unitaries split North and South (and should a Northern Unitary include Milton Keynes?) or are there other options that make sense.

williamjames says...
12:44pm Wed 10 Oct 12

The current leadership of WDC shelved plans to share one Chief Officer between Chiltern, South Bucks and Wycombe DCs. Funny that they still do not see the value in creating a single delivery organisation for the three council areas! One has to ask what agreement there was between the WDC Chief Officer and the incoming Leader Cllr Collingwood to scupper the plans of Lesley Clarke to have one Chief Officer to run the administration of the three councils?

yog says...
1:03pm Wed 10 Oct 12

Short sighted as usual from Wycombe Tories. We can no longer afford to have this many Councils and Councillors.

Now that Wycombe District Council has sold off the housing there is little justification for running a separate Council.

It's just Tories looking after their cushy Councillor allowances.

Darren Hayday says...
1:42pm Wed 10 Oct 12

yog wrote:
Short sighted as usual from Wycombe Tories. We can no longer afford to have this many Councils and Councillors.

Now that Wycombe District Council has sold off the housing there is little justification for running a separate Council.

It's just Tories looking after their cushy Councillor allowances.
Very true. I hope that I can count on your party for cross party support, in first trying to establish a Town Council for Wycombe (then perhaps push for a Unitary afterwards)

tigeran says...
5:33pm Wed 10 Oct 12

"could have saved Wycombe taxpayers £1.1m per year"

Cap benefit payments for any more than 2 children and you would probably save that in very short order!

Voyeur says...
7:58pm Wed 10 Oct 12

If 3 London Boroughs can work together to save money, why can't they do it in Bucks too? No government policy against it apparently.

miccles says...
12:23pm Thu 11 Oct 12

Its obviously not good enough for Mr Collinswood.

Whens the next election? Will he still be around?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree