MP: Residents have 'strong case' in legal action against council

MP: Residents have 'strong case' over legal action against council MP: Residents have 'strong case' over legal action against council

MP Steve Baker believes the Daws Hill Neighbourhood Forum has a “strong case” as residents prepare to drag a council before a judge.

The Wycombe MP was a guest speaker as the forum was officially ratified on Thursday night, before residents voted to take Wycombe District Council to a Judicial Review over the area it has been designated.

Mr Baker is still hopeful the dispute will be settled outside the courtroom but, should it go the distance, he thinks residents have a good chance.

Mr Baker told the meeting: “I think your request is perfectly reasonable.

“It’s a personal opinion, but I think you have a strong case and the RAF base should be part of the neighbourhood forum area.”

The residents association applied to be a forum so it could influence the proposed developments on RAF Daws Hill and the mooted new Wycombe Sports Centre, but these sites were removed by the council.

But the Conservative MP feels the sports centre site is a different case as it affected the wider district, before going on to say councillors are “not tyrants” and they are simply “trying to do what is best for the town”.

He added: “I very much hope Wycombe District Council resolves this with you before it goes to Judicial Review, which would be better.

“But I have lived on Daws Lea, I know what it’s like, and I don’t want to see a bus lane run through there any more than current residents do.”

Neighbourhood Forums were born out of the Localism Act to give residents the chance to shape development within their community.

Mr Baker, who is an executive member of the 1922 Committee, said Parliament could learn from the way residents and ward members had conducted themselves during the forum process.

He said: “Congratulations, I have listened to how you have conducted yourselves and Parliament could learn a thing or two from you.

“...I think it [the Localism Act] is a step forward, I have listened to what you have said and I will bear this in mind when I see the Prime Minister.”

Comments(4)

Stalemate says...
8:41am Sun 21 Oct 12

Steve is a former software engineer with a just over two years in Parliament, how would he be able to judge the merits of Forum's case?

KTinBucks says...
2:16pm Sun 21 Oct 12

Stalemate: The answer is easy. Steve has been briefed over a period of several months; he has spoken with residents, with ward councillors; with WDC cabinet members, with the Residents’ Association, with the Neighbourhood Forum. He has been kept advised of key developments; he has been formally briefed by proponents & opponents. He has made an objective judgement based on lots of consideration – from a more-informed position than most readers, I suspect.

Maybe the residents, and the Residents’ Association, and now the Neighbourhood Forum folk have been “too nice”, working with the WDC consultation processes in the naïve belief that they were being listened to. Maybe a more confrontational and emotional strategy with banners and protests would have brought a different result.
But we are where we are. Legal action is now being pursued, not because the Forum wants to, but because WDC, by their decisions, have removed all other options. The Localism Act has at its heart the intention for local residents to influence developments in their area. WDC needs to recognise this and act democratically .

townraider says...
5:04pm Sun 21 Oct 12

At last Biggles Baker speaks out against his Tory Council. He is bound to get Knuckles wrapped for this

Now I challenge Biggles Baker speak out on other things that matter to your electorate that his Tory run council is mismanaging!!

Stalemate says...
8:11pm Sun 21 Oct 12

KTInBucks

From what you say, Baker would appear to know well the facts entered into the Forum's statement of case and various witness statements.

However determining the strengths of a case, or otherwise, is a separate matter. I made the point that he is unqualified to venture an opinion in that particular matter.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree