News RSS Feed


Complaints against Thames Valley Police increase

Complaints against Thames Valley Police increase Complaints against Thames Valley Police increase

COMPLAINTS made against Thames Valley Police shot up 23 per cent last year, figures reveal today.

The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) said 1,167 complaints were made against officers from the force in 2009/10, compared to the 947 recorded in the 2008/09 period.

A single complaint can comprise of a number of allegations. The total number of allegations made against TVP was 2,183 - up 15 per cent on the previous period.

The main allegations recorded against the force centred around neglect or failure in duty and incivility. The IPCC said this is otherwise known as “rude and late”.

Mike Franklin IPCC commissioner for the south east believes an increased public awareness about the police complaints procedure may be behind the rise - but he has urged the force to learn from its mistakes.

He said: “TVP has seen a higher than usual rise in complaints against officers and this is something that it needs to look carefully at and understand the reasons why.

“Although it may at first glance seem to be bad news for the force, I believe that part of the reason for the increase is improved access to and confidence in the complaints system.

“Prior to the introduction of the IPCC in 2004, the number of people complaining was falling and later research showed only 10 per cent of people who felt like complaining actually did.

"The IPCC and the police are working hard to make sure members of the public who are not satisfied with the service know how to feed that back to police.”

The report in full.

TVP Dept Ch Con Francis Habgood said: "Thames Valley Police as a force can not continue to improve the standard of service we provide to our communities if people do not let us know when they are unhappy.

“Police officers are regularly placed in dangerous and highly stressful situations while keeping our communities safe.

"The challenge for these officers is to maintain the high standards of professionalism and service expected by members of the public while carrying out their duties.

"Reports of this nature allow us to look at what areas we are not delivering the service our communities expect and address any concerns this raises.”

Nationally the figures show 33,854 people complained about the police in England and Wales last year - an eight per cent increase on the previous year.

The IPCC has introduced a new set of ‘key indicators’ to help identify how well complaints are being handled.

The figures include information about the length of time it takes for complaints to be recorded and how long different types of investigations take.

This is initially a nationwide overview but later this year the information will also be published on the IPCC website about individual forces quarterly.

Comments(9)

tigeran says...
1:31pm Thu 24 Feb 11

What are the'complaints' about and who from? Are they about being 'manhandled during an arrest' by a person who is resisting arrest as they are probably guilty or are they complaints about 'noisey sirens' etc? I can guess the majority are probably from the very people the police are here to protect the rest of us from but thanks to the 'human rights' brigade and all the do-gooders these people do complain simply because they can. Very sad.

washondo says...
4:16pm Thu 24 Feb 11

Compensation culture, ambulance chasers, parasitic underemployed legal profession. Tony and his boss not around to invent more laws to keep them busy? Sad. So sue me for telling the truth.

fairywings says...
5:21pm Thu 24 Feb 11

There are faults with the police in this area. When a call of children being noisy on the green has a call out time of 15 minutes but a call for physical assault on a female and criminal damage has a call out time of 5 hours. Not really a consistant service. (Nobody claimed compensation in eaither cases!)

Stand up for England says...
10:21pm Thu 24 Feb 11

tigeran, you have hit the nail on the head. If the IPCC took out of their figures, the complaints made by those with a criminal conviction, the number would drop by over 50%. Additionally, because I know, the resources given to investigating a complaint on an officer, by a s*it-bag, out-of-work, recidivist are far greater than that given to the investigation of an assault, burglary whatever on a law-abiding, tax paying citizen.... and the sad part is, the officer is not innocent until proven guilty. Response IPCC? ..... and we wonder why so many officers can't wait to get out !!!

Michael, HP7 says...
4:53am Fri 25 Feb 11

tigeran sounds like a bnp sympathiser - valiant washonda ditto.

All good on Bucks Free Press.

Multi-cultural knuckles-on-floor.

Wonderful dialogue. Such impartiality.

Occasionally offensive.

Appoint tigeran your new reporter. Best choice.

Supply keyboard and toilet-paper.

Lots more of articulate obnoxious knuckles on the short-list.

tigeran says...
9:14am Fri 25 Feb 11

Michael, HP7 wrote:
tigeran sounds like a bnp sympathiser - valiant washonda ditto. All good on Bucks Free Press. Multi-cultural knuckles-on-floor. Wonderful dialogue. Such impartiality. Occasionally offensive. Appoint tigeran your new reporter. Best choice. Supply keyboard and toilet-paper. Lots more of articulate obnoxious knuckles on the short-list.
And your point is?.................
...

Additional information says...
12:39pm Fri 25 Feb 11

This not only highlights the incompetence and unprofessionalism of Thames Valley Police force but also how many instances of misconduct and incompetence there really are within it.
Thames Valley Police force have a notorious reputation for being one of the worst performing in the country and for having a very large number of complaints raised against them.
For information, in 2008 two complaints that were deemed upheld & substantiated were against the same officer within Thames Valley Police Force, DC Mark Torrington who is based in Banbury. The complaints were raised through the IPCC and after an investigation by the Thames Valley Police Professional Standards Dept (PSD) it was concluded that both complaints against were indeed upheld and substantiated.
The complaints were for ‘Improper Disclosure of Information’ and the investigation report details that DC Torrington disclosed personal & private information and data to the complainants employer on a regular basis and continually providing ‘updates’ therefore breaching the Data Protection Act 1998. Due to this breach Thames Valley Police have also been reported to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).
The second complaint which was also concluded as being upheld & substantiated was for ‘Mishandling of Property’. This involved the same officer, DC Torrington giving away various personal possessions & items of the complainants property to an unauthorized person and also without permission or even recording it.
The investigation report details and concludes that DC Mark Torrington will receive Management Advice from the Area Commander as a result of his actions.
This officer should have been prosecuted in the same way as any member of the public would have been!
However this once again highlights the poor conduct of officers and the very low standard within Thames Valley Police which on many occasions just gets glossed over from the public. The actions of this officer are just one example of why Thames Valley Police have got such a poor reputation and proves that officers including DC Torrington obviously can not be trusted!!

ImpeturbableLawrence says...
11:13pm Mon 28 Feb 11

Eighteen months ago Colin Baker wrote one of his periodic highly simplistic pro-CCTV propaganda pieces in the BFP, in which he patiently explained to us that: 'CCTV ... helps protect police and emergency services from unjust accusations from the public' - Baker’s piece seemed to assume that accusations against the emergency services were regularly made from malicious motives only and CCTV was a useful factor in combating this. As the police themselves seem to accept the justice of the accusations made against DC Mark Torrington, I wonder if CCTV played a part in the detection of well-founded accusations on this occasion.

Lawrence Linehan says...
12:57pm Sat 5 Mar 11

Dear ‘fairywings’ some questions:

Were any of the ''children being noisy on the green' over 6 feet tall?
Were they 'being noisy' by shrieking filthy abuse at each other and at passers by?
Was the group almost entirely male? Was one of them arrested for underage drinking?
How many were smoking?

Couldn’t have been a very serious ‘physical assault on a female and criminal damage’ if the police took 5 hours to respond and nobody claimed compensation.

Last year I was the victim of assault and criminal damage at Wooburn Green and the police responded in a timely fashion.

Finally you seem to be some sort of older woman – how will these yobs ever grow up if someone like you is making excuses and trivialising what they do?

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree