Education RSS Feed


Private and grammar schools could support Cressex Community School in High Wycombe


PRESTIGIOUS private and grammar schools could help support Cressex Community School as the Government takes ‘decisive’ action to improve results.

A consultation launched this week proposes setting up a trust for the High Wycombe school including members from private Wycombe Abbey School and Dr Challoner’s Grammar School.

The trust would appoint most governors and forge links between teachers and students, with Challoner’s taking the lead.

Bosses said the move would improve results – but a union said it amounted to ‘privatisation’ and threatened strikes if teachers’ agreements are breached.

The Government has intervened in the future of the school as part of its controversial National Challenge programme.

Schools must see 30 per cent or more pupils get at least five GCSEs including English and maths grades A* to C to leave the programme – but Cressex fell to 25 per cent last summer.

This made it the second lowest performing school in Bucks. Challoner’s, by contrast, has maintained 99 or 100 per cent the last three years.

It is hoped the changes will take effect from April 1 and attract up to £1m of extra funding.

Headteacher David Hood said: “We are delighted to have the opportunity to work with an outstanding group of partners, who will support us in our mission to raise achievement and broaden the education opportunities available to our students.”

Challoner’s head Dr Mark Fenton said: “The involvement of DCGS in this new venture will enable our school community to make a significant contribution towards enhancing the education of students who do not have many of the advantages which our own boys enjoy.

“Our new role will also open up many opportunities for our staff and students to broaden their own experience by working in partnership with staff and students from Cressex.”

While acknowledging recent strides forward, the consultation document says there needs to be “decisive and effective action by everyone to bring about lasting improvement”.

What do you think? Leave your comments below.

The ‘partners’, also including Buckinghamshire New University, will ‘challenge and support’ the school with a view to driving up results in the next two years, it says.

The document says the trust will aim to improve results, attendance, teaching, leadership and widening qualification and ‘experiences’.

It would also make the Holmers Way school a foundation rather than community school, taking more powers away from Buckinghamshire County Council.

The change would make governors the employer of staff – thought existing pay and conditions remain – and let it set admissions, both presently seen to by the council.

It says admissions could be reviewed – but pledged a ‘fair admissions policy’ and not to ‘introduce selection by ability’.

The council will have a seat on the trust and set ‘robust targets’ it adds.

Yet Annette Pryce, Bucks secretary of the National Union of Teachers said: “The NUT believes that school should remain within local authority control and not privatised.”

And she said: “Any attempt to undermine or reduce teachers conditions of service locally, as national agreements are not affected, will result in a dispute.”

The trust would be called the Cressex Co-operative Learning Partnership, which the school says embodies values of co-operation and learning.

A community representative and the Co-operative College in Manchester take the other two seats along with the university, Challoner’s and £9,400 a term Wycombe Abbey.

The trust, not the governing body, will hold the school’s land and assets. It is currently being rebuilt on the playing field for a September opening.

Councillor Marion Clayton, responsible for education on the county council, said: “We have been working with the school on how best to move forward and this is a very exciting proposal for expanding opportunities and raising standards.”

Last year’s GCSE results, released last week, show the gap between most upper and grammar schools is narrowing.

While grammars stayed at or close to 100 per cent on the key score. Leaps in grades included 42 to 52 at Princes Risborough School and 35 to 49 at Wye Valley School, Bourne End.

The consultation closes on February 22. Public meetings will be held next month.

Click the links below for the consultation documents and more education stories.


Comments(32)

Blueberry says...
1:38pm Tue 19 Jan 10

Even if this is a good if this is a good idea, why partner it with a grammar school in Amersham instead of one of the ones in Wycombe?

andy40 says...
2:39pm Tue 19 Jan 10

Blueberry wrote:
Even if this is a good if this is a good idea, why partner it with a grammar school in Amersham instead of one of the ones in Wycombe?
....or a co-ed grammar school rather than single sex?

Blueberry says...
3:14pm Tue 19 Jan 10

Yeah but Wycombe Abbey is girls so I guess one boys school and one girls school sort of cancel out, but it is all rather an odd idea.

DeepThinker says...
3:15pm Tue 19 Jan 10

"A consultation launched this week proposes setting up a trust ... "

More bureaucracy.

The school, the trust, the local council, the county council, Ofstead, HM Inspectorate of Education, The Department for Children, Schools and Families ...

Will there be extra payments or "expenses" for those who sit on the board of the trust?

Steve Totteridge Hill says...
4:59pm Tue 19 Jan 10

The government at its best...next they'll suggest we should drop the grammer schools?

Ooops they already tried that one!

I wonder what's in it for the grammer schools???

Blueberry says...
5:22pm Tue 19 Jan 10

Good question. Wycombe Abbey is private so it probably wants to pass the public benefit test to keep charitable status, but like you say, what's in it for the grammar or the far away Co-operative College in Manchester?

readerabc says...
6:55pm Tue 19 Jan 10

lts see...cressex gets poor results due to its student profile!
DCGS gets 99-100%..because of its student profile

Cressex is a victim already of selective entry...those who will do well are selected to go to grammar schools!

99+25 / 2 = 62% average attainment across the 2 schools

well above requirement....if only school popualtion were representative of local residents!

does this mean even more money for cressex or whatabout the grammars- what is in it for them????

Mozez says...
7:49pm Tue 19 Jan 10

it was a failing school for a very long time, it has failed the pupils, the parents and the community...yet capitalised on the back of the ethnic population, drawn down funds, and then chosen to privatise...a well thought out plan...highlights the manipulation of ethnic and black communities by local authorities.....

wasnt there also an idea floated some time back for it to be a single faith school, or a muslim girl school....wasnt this a canvass cry, in the respective community, for the politicians some years ago...and didnt they also serve on the governing body...?

Farmer Pickles says...
8:10pm Tue 19 Jan 10

Let's just hope the outdated, backwards and inbred Bucks tories catch up with the views of the modern conservative party and finally decide to scrap grammar schools.

Until then Bucks will always be blighted with struggling schools which fail to make the grade. Segregated education leads to segregated communities and it is a myth by those who want to perpetuate this snobbery that it leads to better educational standards.

OverAbstracted says...
8:24pm Tue 19 Jan 10

"It says admissions could be reviewed – but pledged a ‘fair admissions policy’ and not to ‘introduce selection by ability’. "

That's a telling comment! Implies fair admissions and selection by ability are mutually exclusive.

Moominmama says...
10:05pm Tue 19 Jan 10

Farmer Pickles wrote:
Let's just hope the outdated, backwards and inbred Bucks tories catch up with the views of the modern conservative party and finally decide to scrap grammar schools.

Until then Bucks will always be blighted with struggling schools which fail to make the grade. Segregated education leads to segregated communities and it is a myth by those who want to perpetuate this snobbery that it leads to better educational standards.
Totally agree! Not difficult to get such good results when you have creamed off the top students at aged 11!
Education is not just about results, it is about turning out well rounded, productive individuals, ready to take thier place in society, and contribute thier best, in the REAL world.
In the real world, we meet, and have to deal with all walks of life, surely this is something our children should be taught from as early as possible?
If only the local community would actually support the school, instead of being totally draconian in thier views (the schools bad reputation goes back a long way). By support, I mean send your children there, join the PTA, speak up when you are unhappy about what happens in the school, (parents do have more clout than they realise!)
There will be a £31 million pound facility there, it would be a shame not to make the most of it.

DocD says...
11:23pm Tue 19 Jan 10

Bucks has never got to grips with class and how the Grammar schools socially exclude poor white and minority communities. What is worrying here is the timing of the move when Cressex has started their new build and millions of Government funding have been invested. Smacks of people in power playing the system to get the initial funding for the school and then handing it over to the private sector to run. In my day they use to call this asset stripping. Questions need to be asked...

Moominmama says...
7:03am Wed 20 Jan 10

My understanding of it is, that the school will still be funded by the LEA, but it will have greater autonomy, and access to better resources and expertise, and therefore attainment.
The Trust is a much better path to follow, than Acadamy. If they can make a success of the new school, then who knows, perhaps BCC will overhaul the whole system! (LOL!)
The biggest problem will be to win over those parents who have a snobbish/racist/igno
rant view of Cressex, so that the school community has a greater mix within it. Scrap the 11+! It is not the way forward!

Steve Totteridge Hill says...
9:27am Wed 20 Jan 10

The education idiots...(sorry that should read authority) wanted to send my daughter to that school.

I said over my dead body...guess what...I'm still alive.

The idea of sifting the time wasters from those that can achieve is the reason why Bucks has such a high score in the league tables.

The only failing in the system is that a two tier system still fails those that just pass or those that miss the mark...

There really should be a three tier system!

OverAbstracted says...
10:19am Wed 20 Jan 10

Bucks has a high score in the league tables because it is very wealthy area. Gerrard's Cross, Seer Green, Beaconsfield, High Wycome.. They even took Milton Keynes out of the authority to make it that little bit easier for them to obtain the "high" league score, which in itself appears to be enough for the LEA to consider that their system is a success.

OverAbstracted says...
10:22am Wed 20 Jan 10

Steve: there is such a system. It's called "banding".

Blueberry says...
10:28am Wed 20 Jan 10

OverAbstracted, banding is nothing to do with a 3-tier system.
.
I presume what Steve meant by 3-tier, was a level of school between grammar and upper which was the original idea way back when: secondary moderns, technical schools and grammars.
.
Banding is when a school actively ensures a mix of ability. For example, saying 10% of intake from top 10% of SATs or whatever, 10% from bottom and the rest from the middle.

Blueberry says...
10:33am Wed 20 Jan 10

OverAbstracted, Milton Keynes is a red herring.
.
MK is a unitary authority that is big and rapidly growing and has been largely independent of Bucks ever since it began.
.
If shouldn't ever have been in the Bucks league tables in the first place. If it was, and was then taken out, I doubt Buckinghamshire LEA had much say in the matter anyway.

Blueberry says...
10:37am Wed 20 Jan 10

DocD despite using the word "privatisation" in the article, this isn't a private sector asset-stripping exercise. It will be funded by the state and all the partners but one are state sector educational institutions.
.
I still don't understand the point of the exercise though.

TheTeachersUnion says...
10:47am Wed 20 Jan 10

Remember to go to the public and or parents meeting in february.

OverAbstracted says...
11:53am Wed 20 Jan 10

Dear Blueberry,

I was referring to the comment that "The only failing in the system is that a two tier system still fails those that just pass or those that miss the mark". Leaving aside the obvious observation that "The only failing" affects negatively around 80% of the children by that definition, I thought I'd note that banding by subject ability within schools is, on its own, an alternative. It is used very successfully by many Bucks Primary schools, for example. They also do very well in the League tables: better than the secondary schools by some measures.

Banding has nothing whatever to do with when a school "actively ensures a mix of ability" via its admissions procedures. It is used in Bucks grammar schools, for example.

OverAbstracted says...
11:53am Wed 20 Jan 10

Dear Blueberry,

I was referring to the comment that "The only failing in the system is that a two tier system still fails those that just pass or those that miss the mark". Leaving aside the obvious observation that "The only failing" affects negatively around 80% of the children by that definition, I thought I'd note that banding by subject ability within schools is, on its own, an alternative. It is used very successfully by many Bucks Primary schools, for example. They also do very well in the League tables: better than the secondary schools by some measures.

Banding has nothing whatever to do with when a school "actively ensures a mix of ability" via its admissions procedures. It is used in Bucks grammar schools, for example.

Blueberry says...
11:56am Wed 20 Jan 10

You're talking about streaming.
.
This is banding: http://news.bbc.co.u
k/1/hi/education/436
5238.stm

Moominmama says...
11:56am Wed 20 Jan 10

Steve Totteridge Hill wrote:
The education idiots...(sorry that should read authority) wanted to send my daughter to that school. I said over my dead body...guess what...I'm still alive. The idea of sifting the time wasters from those that can achieve is the reason why Bucks has such a high score in the league tables. The only failing in the system is that a two tier system still fails those that just pass or those that miss the mark... There really should be a three tier system!
Steve,
Did you actually go and look at the school then?

And why was your daughter not allocated Highcrest?

Just being nosey! 8D

OverAbstracted says...
12:08pm Wed 20 Jan 10

Dear Blueberry,
nice point! But in both cases I mentioned, we're being told (here in Bucks) that our children are being "banded".

hrh1 says...
1:55pm Wed 20 Jan 10

What this article fails to address is the fact that due to the outdated grammar school system in Bucks the top 30% of children are 'creamed off'. Secondary schools are then supposed to meet these ridiculous targets without the benefit of the 'high flyers' to bring up the results. Bucks needs a radical overhaul of its education system to scrap Grammar schools and ensure that there i a much fair division of money and resources to ALL schools.
Ex Grammar school pupil

Blueberry says...
2:13pm Wed 20 Jan 10

I often hear it bandied about that grammars get more money and resources and it may well be true, but can anyone point me to the facts that prove it? (I've asked before and no one has.)

Franke says...
11:10pm Wed 20 Jan 10

I just read through the article, and wondered is it only the management of the school that leads to poor results.
Both my children went to this school and achieved good results. One has had a sound career since leaving and now progressed to a management postion, and the other left Cressex and managed to get into 6th form of a local grammer, done well there too, and now at Uni.
They both told me that they achieved because they applied themselves and ignored the distruption going on around them, mainly by other pupils who didn't want to learn, there was also some good teachers there too. They are not proud to say they went to Cressex due to people's perception of the school, but I think they are proud that they did achieve good results when some others couldn't care less.

Moominmama says...
6:52am Thu 21 Jan 10

Blueberry wrote:
I often hear it bandied about that grammars get more money and resources and it may well be true, but can anyone point me to the facts that prove it? (I've asked before and no one has.)
Grammers have large 6th forms.
School funding is directly related to number of pupils. Key stage 3 & 4 students are worth approxiamately £800/year each. KS5 is about double that.

orchard6 says...
12:25pm Fri 22 Jan 10

Wycombe Abbey has been involved with Cressex School for several years - yes, to fulfil its charitable status criteria, but what have they actually done in real terms, if there has been no improvement in that time? Have any WA staff taught there for example?? or is fulfilling the criteria met by allowing use of their facilities when WA is on holiday? Surely their input should have shown some improvement by now! The other problem in the Wycombe area is that many grammar school places are taken up by children from out of county. You only have to be at Bourne End Station just before 8 any morning to see the numbers coming in from the Maidenhead area wearing Bucks grammar school uniforms. On top of that look at the number of Bucks children heading into Maidenhead Comprehensive Schools(Desborough, Furze Platt...) most of whom will have just missed out on the 11+. So, the Grammar Schools have a percentage more than they should, of bright children from out of county, and the Upper School miss out on those who 'just fail', whom the Comprehensives in Berkshire are very happy to admit.

ArnyP_HW says...
2:15pm Fri 22 Jan 10

Franke wrote:
I just read through the article, and wondered is it only the management of the school that leads to poor results. Both my children went to this school and achieved good results. One has had a sound career since leaving and now progressed to a management postion, and the other left Cressex and managed to get into 6th form of a local grammer, done well there too, and now at Uni. They both told me that they achieved because they applied themselves and ignored the distruption going on around them, mainly by other pupils who didn't want to learn, there was also some good teachers there too. They are not proud to say they went to Cressex due to people's perception of the school, but I think they are proud that they did achieve good results when some others couldn't care less.
...and there lies the truth. If a child wishes to learn, they will take full advantage of the facilities made available to them. Lets not cloud the issue with talk of class, money etc. A significant percentage of Cressex School pupils end up there because they are unable to learn at the dizzy heights of the Grammar school students (in which case they are in the best place and have the offer of dedicated assistance at a more suitable level), another significant percentage are there because they have to go to school somewhere and probably wouldn't bother if it wasn't law!
Cressex is an excellent school, making the very best of the situation and undeserved reputation placed upon them.

OverAbstracted says...
2:33pm Fri 22 Jan 10

Blueberry wrote:
I often hear it bandied about that grammars get more money and resources and it may well be true, but can anyone point me to the facts that prove it? (I've asked before and no one has.)
Dear Blueberry,
in addition to Moominmama's point, the donations/endowments are also greater I think. I had a quick look at the Charity Commission's Web page and they had some numbers there which seemed quite large (eg spending of ~£400,000p/a). If this is the case then I don't think this is a bad thing at all, by the way.

Franke: I thought that was a great post!!


Cressex head David Hood Cressex headteacher David Hood

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses