Education RSS Feed


Buckinghamshire County Council schools 'could suffer from academies move'

SCHOOLS remaining under county control could be hit with cuts if the Government allows nine south Buckinghamshire schools to become academies, a council boss warned.

All schools in the county “urgently” need more information on the move, Cllr Martin Tett told cabinet members at Buckinghamshire County Council this week.

Six secondary schools in the south of the county have expressed an interest in becoming academies, a move which would give them freedom from the National Curriculum and the ability to change the length of school terms and times.

Three primary schools have also shown interest (see link below for a list of schools).

Cllr Tett, cabinet member for planning and environment, told the Bucks Free Press after the meeting: “Its important they understand the implications for other schools. I'm not against schools becoming academies, but there's a lot of publicity around about the good things at the moment.”

“There are disadvantages too, such as extra costs and responsibilities and the lack of support they have historically relied on.

The member for The Chalfonts and Seer Green added: “It will be more and more difficult to provide services to the schools that remain.

“They would find it very difficult if some of those services were withdrawn, but it's not yet clear what the implications are.”

Cllr Tett is a school governor at Dr Challoner's Grammar School in Amersham and Bell Lane primary in Little Chalfont.

Val Letheren, member for Terriers and Amersham Hill, told Monday's meeting: “There's a lot of confusion out there...it [academy] sounds like a lovely name and a lovely thing to do but there are a lot of disadvantages.”

Steven Adams, the new education boss at BCC, said he would have to be cautious in talking to schools.

He told cabinet members: “This is a central government proposal with a direct letter to headteachers. I'm very conscious not to go and tell them what's right for them...this could be a very good thing.”

Comments(10)

educationbod says...
8:39pm Thu 1 Jul 10

And the disadvantages are:

What is adversely affected by your or your child’s school becoming an academy?

-Consultation,
-Special Needs,
-EMA Support ,
-Financial Help For Potential -Redundancy And Deficit Situations, -School Transport,
-NQT Induction,
-Governor Support,
-In-Service Training,
-Budget Support,
-School Admissions Arrangements, -Help For Problems With Financial Management, Occupational Health, Pensions And Payroll Services,
-Help For Heads And Governors Facing Complex Situations Around Staff Health, Induction And Training Needs;
-Disability Provision,
-Help with Emergency Situations Such As Fires, Floods, Major Crimes, Deaths;
-Education Welfare,
-Buildings Support,
-Health And Safety,
-Risk And Insurance Management, -Library, Music, Interfaith And Outdoor Education Services, Curriculum Support,
-Legal Services as well as Human Resources support,
-Financial Services,
-School Meals Provision And Tendering,
-VAT Status,
-Behaviour support services,
-Student Counselling Services,
-Capital Funding To Improve School Buildings.........
- Changes to the school day/week year
... and this isn't a complete list...

And that's before they take money away from the surrounding schools provision.....

http://www.antiacade
mies.org.uk/

BigTommy says...
7:41am Fri 2 Jul 10

Unfortunately EducationBod, you are absolutely correct.
~
We are already suffering from the ludicrous policy of "parental choice" when it come to secondary school selection, with many children not getting into the school of their first choice. This will only be increased as more and more parents try to send their children to the new academies -either because they are the latest craze or they have been enticed by the window dressing that will no doubt be used to ensure 100% fulfilment of places. (Refer to EducationBod's list abiove to see what you will actually get ... or not get.)
~
It is strange that in the retail market large companies thrive because of their enormous buying power that pushes down costs.
In education there is a move away from that, creating many smaller cost centres. Costs will inevitably rise and cut backs will need to be made in order to balance the books.
~
When schools and parents moan about cuts and say that there isn't enough money the goverment will turn round and say ... "well, you wanted control of your own money!"
~
Hands carefully washed, the government walks away.

weyfarer says...
9:18am Fri 2 Jul 10

Er don't we waste hundreds of thousands in this county bussing kids out of their catchment areas to Grammar Schools? I think that issue should be addressed first.

miccles says...
9:29am Fri 2 Jul 10

I still think if this goes ahead, in years to come this situation will be another NHS, schools closing etc.

Just stick with what works ok at the moment.

To many people fix things that are not broken.

Voyeur says...
11:29am Fri 2 Jul 10

Weyfarer - you are wrong!

The County Council does not spend hundreds of thousands of pounds bussing kids out of their catchment areas to Grammar Schools.
.
They spend millions and millions of pounds doing it - between 5 and 10 million pounds each year spent out of the education budget bussing kids around the county and in and out of the county.

In addition the County Council "creams off" a top slice of government grant money to pay for thye administration of the 228 schools in the county. If that top slice was removed and given to individual schools, they could probably afford all of those extra services needed to keep kids in education.
.
If they scrapped the transporting of kids everywhere around the county, there would be even more money available for the education part of the education budget.

educationbod says...
12:05pm Fri 2 Jul 10

actually its closer to 18 million on transport. And that is becuase we have the grammar system.

weyfarer says...
1:24pm Fri 2 Jul 10

educationbod wrote:
actually its closer to 18 million on transport. And that is becuase we have the grammar system.
I am astounded. This should be publicesed and more widely known.

Blueberry says...
1:32pm Fri 2 Jul 10

Mickles you said "I still think if this goes ahead, in years to come this situation will be another NHS, schools closing etc."
.
But it's not the same. The NHS can make people wait (a bad thing, but it's possible); you can't do that with education. If there are school aged children they have to be educated somewhere, so once you've squeezed a few more into existing classrooms, you can't really close any more schools.
.
I agree the whole academies idea is crazy.

guesswork says...
10:08am Sat 3 Jul 10

I guess this could lead to a supermarket type battle for schooling as this is where a great deal of turnover will be held in this county. However, looking at the wider scope of employment roles that there are in the workforce. They are not all directly connected to big business like supermarkets so is this how schools would like to represent themselves. I would argue that this type of system would be fair enough.

I guess it's also fair to consider the fact that much of the selective competitiveness with respect schooling in this county is linked to mental maths, literacy and verbal reasoning. Then that learning difficulties in each of these areas could be linked to diet.

This is an interesting example. What is the requirement for "mechanics" in Buckinghamshire? That is mathematicians vs. car repair. Should schools accommodate for these types of differences at all considering costs?

Blueberry says...
12:16pm Tue 6 Jul 10

@guesswork: I understand the individual words and phrases, but overall, I haven't a clue what you're talking about. That may well be my failing rather than yours, but if you'd care to explain again, I'll be listening.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree