Education RSS Feed


Concern that new Bucks academy schools could lose grammar status


CONCERNS have been raised about whether schools gaining academy status could be forced to become a comprehensive under a future Government.

Five grammar schools in south Buckinghamshire have expressed an interest in becoming an academy - a move which would give them freedom from the National Curriculum and the ability to change the length of school terms and times.

They would no longer be run by Conservative-dominated Buckinghamshire County Council, instead being controlled by central Government.

Councillor David Watson, Conservative member for Thames, raised concerns at a full county council meeting yesterday.

He said: “Should a grammar school become an academy? Is there really a long term guarantee that a future Government could not come along and say 'you're no longer under local authority control, you cannot any longer remain a grammar school'?”

Steven Adams, cabinet member for Education, said: “I don't think it's for me to say whether they should or shouldn't – they have to make the decision for themselves.”

He said he was trying to give schools as much information as possible about the move, adding that a group of MPs are currently trying to amend the bill to ensure schools could safeguard their future as grammars.

Secondary schools to show interest in becoming academies are: Royal Grammar School and John Hampden Grammar School in High Wycombe, Dr Challoner's Grammar School in Amersham, Highcrest Community School, Wycombe High School and Chesham High School.

Primaries Seer Green C of E Combined, Chalfont C of E School and Coleshill Church of England Infant School have also shown interest.


Comments(19)

yog says...
11:54am Fri 23 Jul 10

Ironic that it is the Conservatives who are putting the final nail in the coffin of selection.

Blueberry says...
12:06pm Fri 23 Jul 10

Are they?
.
The problem is, that no one knows.
.
There is too little firm information and schools are being pushed to make a quick decision.
.
Whether grammar, upper or primary, they should hold off till it's more certain.

towncryer says...
12:21pm Fri 23 Jul 10

Seems Bucks Grammar snobbery and elitism is coming to an end

towncryer says...
12:23pm Fri 23 Jul 10

Also --sincerely hope this is the end of BCC busing kids at our expense around the county once they opt out of BCC control!

miccles says...
12:45pm Fri 23 Jul 10

Whatever anyone says, if this concockious idea goes ahead, in years to come this will end up like the NHS, full of money grabbing bast**ds, and schools closing down.
This certainly isn't being done for the benefit of the schools and pupils.

Blueberry says...
12:59pm Fri 23 Jul 10

Miccles, it's harder to close schools than hospitals.
.
It's possible (not advisable, but possible) to make patients wait, but if there are school age children, the state is obliged to offer them schooling.
.
Funding could be cut, class sizes increase etc but suggesting widespread closures is alarmist and distracts from the realistic fears.

Laneender says...
1:11pm Fri 23 Jul 10

towncryer wrote:
Seems Bucks Grammar snobbery and elitism is coming to an end
Since when has it been snobbery to allow the brighter kids from poorer backgrounds the means to go to a school that better suits their academic abilities?

Chukka says...
5:43pm Fri 23 Jul 10

Absolutely agree, the opportunity to attend a good school should be open to everyone. Unfortunately there are too many people in this area "buying" Grammar school places by sending boys to private primary schools in order to guarantee passing the 11 plus. In a totally fair system, people that send kids to a private primary school should do so on the basis that they remain in the private sector to ensure that those bright children in state primary education get a fair opportunity at the Grammar Schools

Blueberry says...
7:11pm Fri 23 Jul 10

Chukka, there is a problem about an unlevel playing field, but how is a private school (which isn't allowed to do direct 11+ teaching) more of an advantage than 2 or 3 years of intensive 11+ coaching while at a state primary? And the coaching can be done secretly, but your child's school is a matter of public record.

deecee01 says...
7:27pm Fri 23 Jul 10

Children should not be coached to pass the 11+. If they cannot go into an exam and pass of their own accord they should not be at grammar schools. It's usually the parents snobbery of keeping up with the neighbours, that makes them pump their kids with coaching just so they sound good when boasting at the Rotary Club

Blueberry says...
7:36pm Fri 23 Jul 10

I agree about no coaching - in theory. But how do you stop it in practice? People can do it on the quiet.

towncryer says...
12:41am Sat 24 Jul 10

Laneender wrote:
towncryer wrote:
Seems Bucks Grammar snobbery and elitism is coming to an end
Since when has it been snobbery to allow the brighter kids from poorer backgrounds the means to go to a school that better suits their academic abilities?
The snobbery and elitism is with Tory Bucks council who persist with Grammar schools

Its time all schools were same standard as the Grammar schools

Blueberry says...
6:48am Sat 24 Jul 10

How could all schools be the "same standard" as grammars?
.
Can ALL schools get over 95% of their pupils getting at least 8 A-C GCSEs, or whatever stat you want to pick?
.
And if you don't mean exam results, what do you mean?

Plus ça change... says...
8:53am Sat 24 Jul 10

If parents share their academic knowledge with their kids, it's not 'coaching'. It's just being a good parent.

It's more rewarding that watching soap operas and reality TV.

I can understand that some schools in the future will want to be free of some of the restraints they are under and it probably means us paying fees. Seems inevitable to me.

Doesn't matter what you call them then.

Plus ça change... says...
8:56am Sat 24 Jul 10

that = than

deecee01 says...
10:15am Sat 24 Jul 10

In response to your quote - "If parents share their academic knowledge with their kids, it's not 'coaching'. It's just being a good parent. "

Of course sharing knowledge with your children is being a good parent.

Being a bad parent is forcing your child to go to paid 11+ coaching lessons from about Year 3, just to make sure they get into a Grammar School, so the parents can boast to everyone which school their little darling is at.

As I said earlier, if the child can sit the 11+ plus exam having just done a handful of practice papers, and pass the exam, then they are an ideal candidate for a grammar school. A child who has been coached to pass an 11+ paper may not necessarily cope in a grammar school once they get there. They could then face 5 years of misery trying to keep up with the other students, but continually scared of their overpowering parents refusing to realise that they are in the wrong school.

Make no mistake, there are plenty of those types of families in this area.

educationbod says...
6:21pm Sat 24 Jul 10

No one knows what gove's final agenda will be: the bill makes provision for allowing gramers to remain selective, but academies traditionally select 10% anyway.

So not only are they taking money away from other schools services but they are increasing selection.


Which would seem to fit what the guardian reported, that eventually the admissions code could be dimished. a bit like what happens to teachers protected working conditions a few years after being in an academy.. diminished.. its all very well heads wanting 'independent school freedoms'... well they certainly wont have the independent school class sizes.....

I also dont see the new academies suddenyl giving their staff the 2 month long summer break that independent schools get.

guesswork says...
10:20pm Sun 25 Jul 10

I'm unsure whether a "Grammar" status is helpful label for school or not? I'm sure there are financial people that know. I guess it is different for every student. I spent part of my time at a "High" which is a grammar as far as I understand.

I've met people from in Bucks who thought it was a girls school and outside Bucks who thought it was in the United States. There is a competitive element toward grammar pupils which is not always helpful. As is vice versa I guess. If the strength of grammar is in languages and literature then I guess academies may be more technically biased. However, I guess it depends on what is offered and what pupils choose.

demoness says...
7:18am Mon 26 Jul 10

deecee01 wrote:
In response to your quote - "If parents share their academic knowledge with their kids, it's not 'coaching'. It's just being a good parent. " Of course sharing knowledge with your children is being a good parent. Being a bad parent is forcing your child to go to paid 11+ coaching lessons from about Year 3, just to make sure they get into a Grammar School, so the parents can boast to everyone which school their little darling is at. As I said earlier, if the child can sit the 11+ plus exam having just done a handful of practice papers, and pass the exam, then they are an ideal candidate for a grammar school. A child who has been coached to pass an 11+ paper may not necessarily cope in a grammar school once they get there. They could then face 5 years of misery trying to keep up with the other students, but continually scared of their overpowering parents refusing to realise that they are in the wrong school. Make no mistake, there are plenty of those types of families in this area.
Spot on Deecee. Both my daughters went to the High School and they would come home and say it was obvious which girls had been coached to pass because they were struggling big time to cope with the work load.
It has always been about the parents - it is them that make the kids feel they are second best - not the system. I can remember with my 2, there were stupid parents at their primary school promising the children computers and all sorts if they passed.

Far better to be top at an Upper school and happy and confident, than bottom at a Grammar.
And the chances are you would come out with better results that way..


Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses