Tories hold Bucks as Bercow re-elected

Wycombe MP Steve Baker Wycombe MP Steve Baker

Watch a video from the Wycombe, Beaconsfield and Chesham & Amersham counts above.

CONSERVATIVES increased their share of the vote to comfortably hold onto Wycombe, Beaconsfield, Chesham & Amersham and Aylesbury.

Steve Baker was elected as MP for Wycombe to replace Tory Paul Goodman, who stepped down.

Dominic Grieve kept Beaconsfield with Cheryl Gillan and David Lidginton keeping Chesham & Amersham and Aylesbury respectively.

And John Bercow - a Conservative who stood as an independent after being elected as Commons speaker - has held onto Buckingham.

Turnout increased at all counts.

The Liberal Democrats overtook Labour to take second place in Wycombe – but there was no major change as the party again too second in Beaconsfield, Chesham & Amersham and Aylesbury.

Mr Baker, who replaced Paul Goodman, got 23,423 votes to take 48.6 per cent of the vote. This improved on Mr Goodman’s 45.8 per cent and 42.4 per cent shares in 2001 and 2005.

Lib Dem Steve Guy saw his party swap roles with Labour compared to previous polls as he came second with 13,863 votes, 28.8 per cent of the vote. Labour’s Andrew Lomas got 8,326 votes, 17.3 per cent.

In 2005 Labour got 29.9 per cent and the Lib Dems got 19.8 per cent.

Mr Baker said: “I am absolutely honoured and privileged to have been Wycombe’s member of Parliament.

“My priority is to try to put the honour back into honourable member.”

Cheryl Gillan fended off the Liberal Democrats' best-ever showing to stay as MP for the Buckinghamshire constituency she has served since 1992 with 31,658 votes, a 60.4 per cent share. This was 54.4 per cent in 2005.

Click the links at the bottom of this story for our General Election website, including full results, and stories from each count.

Mrs Gillan said she was “very proud to be going back to Westminster on behalf of Chesham and Amersham” - but called for a “strong Government” to be formed after tonight's election.

Mr Lidington also retains the seat he won in 1992.

He took 52.2 per cent of the votes, up from 49.1 per cent at the last general election.

He received 27, 736 votes of the 53, 273 turnout with Liberal Democrat candidate Steven Lambert coming in second with 15, 118.

Mr Lidington said: “I am feeling elated at the moment. I am delighted and humbled by the vote of confidence.

“I think people were also voting for a change of government. I think they were voting for a government that would make a fresh start- that would try to rebuild the economy and stop going the way of Greece.”

Dominic Grieve kept Beaconsfield with 32,053, 61.06 per cent of the vote. Lib Dem John Edwards came second with 19.57 per cent of the vote, compared to the 20.4 per cent achieved by the party in the last election.

In Maidenhead Theresa May, Conservative, won with 31,937 votes. Second was Tony Hill, Liberal Democrat, with 15,168 ahead of Pat McDonald, Labour, with 3,795 and Kenneth Wight, UK Independence Party, with 1,243.

Then came Tim Rait, British National Party, with 825, Peter Forbes, Green, 482 and Peter Prior, Freedom and Responsibility, 270. The turnout was 53,720.

The Liberal Democrats today took a seat off the Tories at a Wycombe District Council by-election (see link, bottom of story).

The Buckingham count will take place on Friday morning and we will bring you the result as we get it.

Also announced during the Chesham and Amersham count was the result of a Chiltern District Council by-election for Amersham on the Hill.

The Conservatives retained the ward after a closely-fought battle, with Nigel Shepherd polls 1,125 votes for the Tories ahead of 1,073 for Lib Dem candidate Howard Maitland-Jones. Labour's Peter Harper took 203 votes.

The seat became available following the resignation of Cllr Ronnie Lamont earlier this year.

Click here for our picture gallery from tonight.

Read our live blog to see how events unfolded.

Comments (26)

9:45pm Thu 6 May 10

sidthesexist says...

While you are there ask them why they are writing down our polling numbers next to the number that is stamped onto the back of the voting paper. after all this is supposed to be a secret ballot according to the BBC webby, yet this will allow them to cross reference who we all are voting for.
While you are there ask them why they are writing down our polling numbers next to the number that is stamped onto the back of the voting paper. after all this is supposed to be a secret ballot according to the BBC webby, yet this will allow them to cross reference who we all are voting for. sidthesexist

2:08am Fri 7 May 10

rifrafbob says...

I think it`s a shame we did not have the B.N.P standing in Wycombe, we might then have had a true picture of peoples feeling here.
I think it`s a shame we did not have the B.N.P standing in Wycombe, we might then have had a true picture of peoples feeling here. rifrafbob

2:25am Fri 7 May 10

demoness says...

rifrafbob wrote:
I think it`s a shame we did not have the B.N.P standing in Wycombe, we might then have had a true picture of peoples feeling here.
The fact that we didn't should tell you something.
[quote][p][bold]rifrafbob[/bold] wrote: I think it`s a shame we did not have the B.N.P standing in Wycombe, we might then have had a true picture of peoples feeling here.[/p][/quote]The fact that we didn't should tell you something. demoness

2:30am Fri 7 May 10

demoness says...

Doesn't seem like the electorate are convinced by Cleggyboy the used car salesman. :)
Doesn't seem like the electorate are convinced by Cleggyboy the used car salesman. :) demoness

2:49am Fri 7 May 10

rifrafbob says...

demoness,Hades
The reason they did not put up a candidate in wycombe is because they are a self funding party and have to put there money into areas where they can do most good.
demoness,Hades The reason they did not put up a candidate in wycombe is because they are a self funding party and have to put there money into areas where they can do most good. rifrafbob

3:18am Fri 7 May 10

OllieNewbury says...

Tories have Wycombe.
Tories have Wycombe. OllieNewbury

3:21am Fri 7 May 10

TheTeachersUnion says...

demoness wrote:
Doesn't seem like the electorate are convinced by Cleggyboy the used car salesman. :)
you can't really keep the moral high ground when you make comments like this... lowering yourself perhaps ?
[quote][p][bold]demoness[/bold] wrote: Doesn't seem like the electorate are convinced by Cleggyboy the used car salesman. :)[/p][/quote]you can't really keep the moral high ground when you make comments like this... lowering yourself perhaps ? TheTeachersUnion

6:18am Fri 7 May 10

BigTommy says...

So the BFP poll wasn't anywhere near.
~
So why publish a poll the day before an election?
Surely the BFP wasn't trying to unduly influence the election by bigging up the LibDem vote?
~
If the rules apply to the rest of the media, then why not the BFP?
~
So the BFP poll wasn't anywhere near. ~ So why publish a poll the day before an election? Surely the BFP wasn't trying to unduly influence the election by bigging up the LibDem vote? ~ If the rules apply to the rest of the media, then why not the BFP? ~ BigTommy

6:52am Fri 7 May 10

demoness says...

TheTeachersUnion wrote:
demoness wrote: Doesn't seem like the electorate are convinced by Cleggyboy the used car salesman. :)
you can't really keep the moral high ground when you make comments like this... lowering yourself perhaps ?
I don't claim the moral highground at all.
I have made my dislike of lib dem's woolly politics all the way through. I also watched all 3 leaders debates and was not impressed by Clegg at all.
Neither ( despite all the hype) was the public.
[quote][p][bold]TheTeachersUnion[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]demoness[/bold] wrote: Doesn't seem like the electorate are convinced by Cleggyboy the used car salesman. :)[/p][/quote]you can't really keep the moral high ground when you make comments like this... lowering yourself perhaps ?[/p][/quote]I don't claim the moral highground at all. I have made my dislike of lib dem's woolly politics all the way through. I also watched all 3 leaders debates and was not impressed by Clegg at all. Neither ( despite all the hype) was the public. demoness

7:28am Fri 7 May 10

iranianyouth says...

Great a bigoted MP representing us yeh
Great a bigoted MP representing us yeh iranianyouth

7:33am Fri 7 May 10

demoness says...

BigTommy wrote:
So the BFP poll wasn't anywhere near. ~ So why publish a poll the day before an election? Surely the BFP wasn't trying to unduly influence the election by bigging up the LibDem vote? ~ If the rules apply to the rest of the media, then why not the BFP? ~
Because a lot of lib dems read this site BT.
Do you ever see supporters of the labour or tory party on here? No, always it is the lib dems moaning and carrying on.
The BFP can only go on what was voted here... don't think it was anything to do with the real picture at all.
[quote][p][bold]BigTommy[/bold] wrote: So the BFP poll wasn't anywhere near. ~ So why publish a poll the day before an election? Surely the BFP wasn't trying to unduly influence the election by bigging up the LibDem vote? ~ If the rules apply to the rest of the media, then why not the BFP? ~[/p][/quote]Because a lot of lib dems read this site BT. Do you ever see supporters of the labour or tory party on here? No, always it is the lib dems moaning and carrying on. The BFP can only go on what was voted here... don't think it was anything to do with the real picture at all. demoness

8:12am Fri 7 May 10

bexs60 says...

Congratulations to the conservatives - excellent result for Wycombe - well done.
Congratulations to the conservatives - excellent result for Wycombe - well done. bexs60

8:13am Fri 7 May 10

Phredd says...

We are always being told the constituancy system is best because you vote for someone to represent your local views.

Poppycock

Following the boundary change I feel we might as well have PR, where we don't vote for a particular candidate.

We have been moved from the Wycombe to Aylesbury constituancy. I have absolutely nothing to do with Aylesbury.

I voted, because I feel it is my duty, but I voted for the party I felt least likely to implement HS2 rather than any other reason.
We are always being told the constituancy system is best because you vote for someone to represent your local views. Poppycock Following the boundary change I feel we might as well have PR, where we don't vote for a particular candidate. We have been moved from the Wycombe to Aylesbury constituancy. I have absolutely nothing to do with Aylesbury. I voted, because I feel it is my duty, but I voted for the party I felt least likely to implement HS2 rather than any other reason. Phredd

8:22am Fri 7 May 10

Slimster says...

Time for Mr Baker to do some work and show appreciation for all those who voted for someone who is basically an unknown quantity except for the blue rosette.
Time for Mr Baker to do some work and show appreciation for all those who voted for someone who is basically an unknown quantity except for the blue rosette. Slimster

8:28am Fri 7 May 10

Kadoogan says...

rifrafbob wrote:
I think it`s a shame we did not have the B.N.P standing in Wycombe, we might then have had a true picture of peoples feeling here.
I agree with you rifrafbob. I think if the BNP had put up a candidate in Wycombe I think we would have had a true picture of people's feelings.... the picture being that people don't like racist scum and the BNP would have had their butts firmly kicked.
[quote][p][bold]rifrafbob[/bold] wrote: I think it`s a shame we did not have the B.N.P standing in Wycombe, we might then have had a true picture of peoples feeling here.[/p][/quote]I agree with you rifrafbob. I think if the BNP had put up a candidate in Wycombe I think we would have had a true picture of people's feelings.... the picture being that people don't like racist scum and the BNP would have had their butts firmly kicked. Kadoogan

9:15am Fri 7 May 10

Lillymoe says...

iranianyouth wrote:
Great a bigoted MP representing us yeh
Yep with a majority of the votes yeh
[quote][p][bold]iranianyouth[/bold] wrote: Great a bigoted MP representing us yeh[/p][/quote]Yep with a majority of the votes yeh Lillymoe

9:17am Fri 7 May 10

Lillymoe says...

bexs60 wrote:
Congratulations to the conservatives - excellent result for Wycombe - well done.
Yes well done Tories, goes to show how people feel from the votes.
[quote][p][bold]bexs60[/bold] wrote: Congratulations to the conservatives - excellent result for Wycombe - well done.[/p][/quote]Yes well done Tories, goes to show how people feel from the votes. Lillymoe

9:23am Fri 7 May 10

tigeran says...

iranianyouth wrote:
Great a bigoted MP representing us yeh
Why is he bigoted? Please explaine yourself.
[quote][p][bold]iranianyouth[/bold] wrote: Great a bigoted MP representing us yeh[/p][/quote]Why is he bigoted? Please explaine yourself. tigeran

9:25am Fri 7 May 10

Lillymoe says...

Lillymoe wrote:
iranianyouth wrote: Great a bigoted MP representing us yeh
Yep with a majority of the votes yeh
AND before anyone pipes up... im being sarcastic... the MP is not bigoted... this is a silly comment !
[quote][p][bold]Lillymoe[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]iranianyouth[/bold] wrote: Great a bigoted MP representing us yeh[/p][/quote]Yep with a majority of the votes yeh[/p][/quote]AND before anyone pipes up... im being sarcastic... the MP is not bigoted... this is a silly comment ! Lillymoe

9:26am Fri 7 May 10

wayneo says...

Hung Parliament; arguing Politicians, a deficit the size of Turkey's GDP, taxes to go up, cuts to come,Europe in flames, now we'll have civil unrest like never seen before.
Hung Parliament; arguing Politicians, a deficit the size of Turkey's GDP, taxes to go up, cuts to come,Europe in flames, now we'll have civil unrest like never seen before. wayneo

9:32am Fri 7 May 10

tigeran says...

Lillymoe wrote:
Lillymoe wrote:
iranianyouth wrote: Great a bigoted MP representing us yeh
Yep with a majority of the votes yeh
AND before anyone pipes up... im being sarcastic... the MP is not bigoted... this is a silly comment !
Dont worry, 'iranianyouth' is probably one of THE MOST bigoted people you could meet yet can never see it!
[quote][p][bold]Lillymoe[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lillymoe[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]iranianyouth[/bold] wrote: Great a bigoted MP representing us yeh[/p][/quote]Yep with a majority of the votes yeh[/p][/quote]AND before anyone pipes up... im being sarcastic... the MP is not bigoted... this is a silly comment ![/p][/quote]Dont worry, 'iranianyouth' is probably one of THE MOST bigoted people you could meet yet can never see it! tigeran

12:10pm Fri 7 May 10

Lillymoe says...

tigeran wrote:
Lillymoe wrote:
Lillymoe wrote:
iranianyouth wrote: Great a bigoted MP representing us yeh
Yep with a majority of the votes yeh
AND before anyone pipes up... im being sarcastic... the MP is not bigoted... this is a silly comment !
Dont worry, 'iranianyouth' is probably one of THE MOST bigoted people you could meet yet can never see it!
DOH and i have to agree with you again :)
Oh no hung parliment... Please Please not the tax on tax on tax.... I really hope it does not go that ar**h**e's way !
[quote][p][bold]tigeran[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lillymoe[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lillymoe[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]iranianyouth[/bold] wrote: Great a bigoted MP representing us yeh[/p][/quote]Yep with a majority of the votes yeh[/p][/quote]AND before anyone pipes up... im being sarcastic... the MP is not bigoted... this is a silly comment ![/p][/quote]Dont worry, 'iranianyouth' is probably one of THE MOST bigoted people you could meet yet can never see it![/p][/quote]DOH and i have to agree with you again :) Oh no hung parliment... Please Please not the tax on tax on tax.... I really hope it does not go that ar**h**e's way ! Lillymoe

12:24pm Fri 7 May 10

Steve Totteridge Hill says...

I'd be happy if PR were to be brought in...however it'll not happen in my lifetime ;-(

Code words very apt.
back-spot...
Sorry I thought that said Black spot!
I'd be happy if PR were to be brought in...however it'll not happen in my lifetime ;-( Code words very apt. back-spot... Sorry I thought that said Black spot! Steve Totteridge Hill

12:37pm Fri 7 May 10

BigTommy says...

demoness wrote:
BigTommy wrote: So the BFP poll wasn't anywhere near. ~ So why publish a poll the day before an election? Surely the BFP wasn't trying to unduly influence the election by bigging up the LibDem vote? ~ If the rules apply to the rest of the media, then why not the BFP? ~
Because a lot of lib dems read this site BT. Do you ever see supporters of the labour or tory party on here? No, always it is the lib dems moaning and carrying on. The BFP can only go on what was voted here... don't think it was anything to do with the real picture at all.
That is the whole point. Publishing polls on the day before or day of an election is not allowed so that distorted polls such as the BFP one cannot influence people.
~
Why is the BFP allowed to be different from the rest of the media?
[quote][p][bold]demoness[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BigTommy[/bold] wrote: So the BFP poll wasn't anywhere near. ~ So why publish a poll the day before an election? Surely the BFP wasn't trying to unduly influence the election by bigging up the LibDem vote? ~ If the rules apply to the rest of the media, then why not the BFP? ~[/p][/quote]Because a lot of lib dems read this site BT. Do you ever see supporters of the labour or tory party on here? No, always it is the lib dems moaning and carrying on. The BFP can only go on what was voted here... don't think it was anything to do with the real picture at all.[/p][/quote]That is the whole point. Publishing polls on the day before or day of an election is not allowed so that distorted polls such as the BFP one cannot influence people. ~ Why is the BFP allowed to be different from the rest of the media? BigTommy

12:38pm Fri 7 May 10

wayneo says...

Steve Totteridge Hill wrote:
I'd be happy if PR were to be brought in...however it'll not happen in my lifetime ;-( Code words very apt. back-spot... Sorry I thought that said Black spot!
Me too, it would break the stranglehold of the two main parties however we might forever be having deals upon deals. Whether that would be more democratic remains to be seen but never again, can we have the majority that the likes of Blair had, the damage that tyke was able to was considerable.
[quote][p][bold]Steve Totteridge Hill[/bold] wrote: I'd be happy if PR were to be brought in...however it'll not happen in my lifetime ;-( Code words very apt. back-spot... Sorry I thought that said Black spot![/p][/quote]Me too, it would break the stranglehold of the two main parties however we might forever be having deals upon deals. Whether that would be more democratic remains to be seen but never again, can we have the majority that the likes of Blair had, the damage that tyke was able to was considerable. wayneo

2:35pm Fri 7 May 10

marcusmills says...

This article states that "Turnout increased at all counts." which is simply untrue. According to the BBC website the turnout was down by 3.8%

If you can't get simple facts correct how do you expect to be credible.
This article states that "Turnout increased at all counts." which is simply untrue. According to the BBC website the turnout was down by 3.8% If you can't get simple facts correct how do you expect to be credible. marcusmills

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree