Bercow is re-elected in Buckingham

John Bercow is re-elected in Buckingham John Bercow is re-elected in Buckingham

THE BUCKINGHAM seat has been won by the incumbent MP and Speaker of the House of Commons Speaker John Bercow.

He retains a big majority with 22,860 of the votes - though this is down by 4,888 on the 2005 General Election result.

UKIP candidate Nigel Farage, who is still in hospital after he was involved in an aeroplane crash yesterday, finished in third place with 8,401 votes.

Some commentators had thought Mr Farage would come close to toppling Mr Bercow, but these predictions did not translate into votes.

The Independent candidate John Stevens was delighted to finish in second place, with 10,331 votes. See the full results below.

The turnout was 65.9 per cent, while there was 982 unmarked or void ballot papers.

There was a pack of photographers and journalists from national newspapers and broadcasters at the ballot count, which was held at The Civic Centre in Aylesbury today.

After his victory Mr Bercow praised his UKIP opponent Nigel Farage for fighting an “honourable campaign”, saying : “He suffered a horrifying accident and I wish him and the pilot who was with him a full and speedy recovery.”

When asked on his thoughts on who should form a coalition Government he said: “I'm simply not going to get into any of that...those are not matters for the Speaker of the house.”

Nine candidates lined up to fight Mr Bercow, but none from the three major parties.

This is because of the convention that they do not stand against the Speaker – who is seen as Independent.

Mr Bercow, who was a Conservative MP until 2009, said this tradition had angered many voters and vowed to take the public's feelings on the issue back to Westminster.

He said it had been a good campaign “on the whole” but added “there is an element of cheap abuse which sometimes creeps in”.

He had previously accused Independent candidate John Stevens of conducting “the nastiest, filthiest, most vitriolic campaign...in the history of this constituency.”

But Mr Stevens defended his 'strongly personal' campaign leaflets saying: “It was a rough and tough campaign.

If you're going to be rude about someone's expenses then you've got to just come out and do it.”

Mr Stevens said all his leaflets had drawn facts from national newspapers.

He had also arranged for a 'flipping' dolphin to follow Mr Bercow on parts of his campaign trail - a reference to his expenses claims for a second home.

Despite the third place finish for Mr Farage, his agent Dave Fowler said it was a “very good result” for UKIP.

The vote represented an increase of 6,969 on the party's vote in 2005.

The Princes Risborough area moved into the Buckingham constituency from Aylesbury at this election.

List of results: Speaker: John Bercow - 22,860, UK Independence Party: Nigel Farage - 8,401, Independent: Patrick Phillips - 2,394, Independent - Buckinghamshire Campaign for Democracy Party: John Stevens - 10,331, BNP: Lynne Mozar - 980, Independent: Geoff Howard - 435, Independent: Anthony Watts - 332, Independent: Debbie Martin - 1,270, The Christian Party: David Hews - 369, Monster Raving Loony Party: Colin Dale - 856, Cut the Deficit Party: Simon Strutt - 107.

Comments (12)

12:40pm Fri 7 May 10

wayneo says...

Come on Nigel! Bercow's more Nu Labour anyway.
Come on Nigel! Bercow's more Nu Labour anyway. wayneo

1:02pm Fri 7 May 10

MCarey says...

sorry to be thick but which party is Bercow representing, it doesnt say in the article. as he is speaker is he labour?
sorry to be thick but which party is Bercow representing, it doesnt say in the article. as he is speaker is he labour? MCarey

1:23pm Fri 7 May 10

Voyeur says...

The theory is that the Speaker is independent, so he is representing no particular party.
The theory is that the Speaker is independent, so he is representing no particular party. Voyeur

2:08pm Fri 7 May 10

MCarey says...

Voyeur wrote:
The theory is that the Speaker is independent, so he is representing no particular party.
ok thanks Voyeur
[quote][p][bold]Voyeur[/bold] wrote: The theory is that the Speaker is independent, so he is representing no particular party.[/p][/quote]ok thanks Voyeur MCarey

3:33pm Fri 7 May 10

motco says...

But he's a Tory, much to their distress.
But he's a Tory, much to their distress. motco

4:07pm Fri 7 May 10

sai-diva says...

Didn't want him, couldn't vote for who I did want, is this democracy?
Spoiled my ballot paper, what a farce.
Didn't want him, couldn't vote for who I did want, is this democracy? Spoiled my ballot paper, what a farce. sai-diva

4:55pm Fri 7 May 10

Could be worse says...

sai-diva wrote:
Didn't want him, couldn't vote for who I did want, is this democracy? Spoiled my ballot paper, what a farce.
Could agree with you more. Unfortunately due to this countries ridiculous un-written constitution one of the possible eventualities in a hung parliament is that the Speaker and his deputies receive casting votes (which traditionally they never use in a normal majority Parliament)on difficult bills. Hence the historical precedent whereby the encumbent Speaker stands without opposition so as not to risk the speaker not being re-elected in a hung Parliament. Again this is not featured directly in our great un-written constitution which is why UKIP were able to stand against him in Buckingham this time but that will not count for much unless the major parties also buck this historic trend. Politically this country is about 3 steps behind the wheel in terms of evolution.
[quote][p][bold]sai-diva[/bold] wrote: Didn't want him, couldn't vote for who I did want, is this democracy? Spoiled my ballot paper, what a farce.[/p][/quote]Could agree with you more. Unfortunately due to this countries ridiculous un-written constitution one of the possible eventualities in a hung parliament is that the Speaker and his deputies receive casting votes (which traditionally they never use in a normal majority Parliament)on difficult bills. Hence the historical precedent whereby the encumbent Speaker stands without opposition so as not to risk the speaker not being re-elected in a hung Parliament. Again this is not featured directly in our great un-written constitution which is why UKIP were able to stand against him in Buckingham this time but that will not count for much unless the major parties also buck this historic trend. Politically this country is about 3 steps behind the wheel in terms of evolution. Could be worse

6:41pm Fri 7 May 10

wayneo says...

Could be worse wrote:
sai-diva wrote: Didn't want him, couldn't vote for who I did want, is this democracy? Spoiled my ballot paper, what a farce.
Could agree with you more. Unfortunately due to this countries ridiculous un-written constitution one of the possible eventualities in a hung parliament is that the Speaker and his deputies receive casting votes (which traditionally they never use in a normal majority Parliament)on difficult bills. Hence the historical precedent whereby the encumbent Speaker stands without opposition so as not to risk the speaker not being re-elected in a hung Parliament. Again this is not featured directly in our great un-written constitution which is why UKIP were able to stand against him in Buckingham this time but that will not count for much unless the major parties also buck this historic trend. Politically this country is about 3 steps behind the wheel in terms of evolution.
Yes, and we have the nerve to 'export' our form of democracy :-(
[quote][p][bold]Could be worse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]sai-diva[/bold] wrote: Didn't want him, couldn't vote for who I did want, is this democracy? Spoiled my ballot paper, what a farce.[/p][/quote]Could agree with you more. Unfortunately due to this countries ridiculous un-written constitution one of the possible eventualities in a hung parliament is that the Speaker and his deputies receive casting votes (which traditionally they never use in a normal majority Parliament)on difficult bills. Hence the historical precedent whereby the encumbent Speaker stands without opposition so as not to risk the speaker not being re-elected in a hung Parliament. Again this is not featured directly in our great un-written constitution which is why UKIP were able to stand against him in Buckingham this time but that will not count for much unless the major parties also buck this historic trend. Politically this country is about 3 steps behind the wheel in terms of evolution.[/p][/quote]Yes, and we have the nerve to 'export' our form of democracy :-( wayneo

6:59pm Fri 7 May 10

Malcolm Lowes says...

Sadly, those of us who voted for John Stevens could only give him 10,000 + votes. Those who voted for Mr. Speaker, John Bercow, should truly feel proud of themselves for returning to the House an MP whose expense returns still raise a huge question mark above his head. A bad day for electoral justice.
Sadly, those of us who voted for John Stevens could only give him 10,000 + votes. Those who voted for Mr. Speaker, John Bercow, should truly feel proud of themselves for returning to the House an MP whose expense returns still raise a huge question mark above his head. A bad day for electoral justice. Malcolm Lowes

9:41pm Fri 7 May 10

J B Blackett says...

You Buckingham people ( and Princes risboro ?) should hang your heads in shame for 'voting' for such a crooked smarmy greedy uncouth ill-mannered toad of a excuse for a democrat ! Perhaps you think you deserve him.
.
No offence intended.
You Buckingham people ( and Princes risboro ?) should hang your heads in shame for 'voting' for such a crooked smarmy greedy uncouth ill-mannered toad of a excuse for a democrat ! Perhaps you think you deserve him. . No offence intended. J B Blackett

8:18am Sat 8 May 10

demoness says...

J B Blackett wrote:
You Buckingham people ( and Princes risboro ?) should hang your heads in shame for 'voting' for such a crooked smarmy greedy uncouth ill-mannered toad of a excuse for a democrat ! Perhaps you think you deserve him. . No offence intended.
JBB

You do not seem to have a lot of time for any politicians or parties. Might I be so bold to ask if you voted?
[quote][p][bold]J B Blackett[/bold] wrote: You Buckingham people ( and Princes risboro ?) should hang your heads in shame for 'voting' for such a crooked smarmy greedy uncouth ill-mannered toad of a excuse for a democrat ! Perhaps you think you deserve him. . No offence intended.[/p][/quote]JBB You do not seem to have a lot of time for any politicians or parties. Might I be so bold to ask if you voted? demoness

10:20am Sat 8 May 10

laidbare says...

demoness wrote:
J B Blackett wrote:
You Buckingham people ( and Princes risboro ?) should hang your heads in shame for 'voting' for such a crooked smarmy greedy uncouth ill-mannered toad of a excuse for a democrat ! Perhaps you think you deserve him. . No offence intended.
JBB

You do not seem to have a lot of time for any politicians or parties. Might I be so bold to ask if you voted?
I am quite impressed by JBB's knowledge of John Bercow. I would also like to add to the list of traits by mentioning the extreme brown nosing that he did to become speaker.

The level of respect for him is surely clear by how many stood against him in Buckingham?
[quote][p][bold]demoness[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J B Blackett[/bold] wrote: You Buckingham people ( and Princes risboro ?) should hang your heads in shame for 'voting' for such a crooked smarmy greedy uncouth ill-mannered toad of a excuse for a democrat ! Perhaps you think you deserve him. . No offence intended.[/p][/quote]JBB You do not seem to have a lot of time for any politicians or parties. Might I be so bold to ask if you voted?[/p][/quote]I am quite impressed by JBB's knowledge of John Bercow. I would also like to add to the list of traits by mentioning the extreme brown nosing that he did to become speaker. The level of respect for him is surely clear by how many stood against him in Buckingham? laidbare

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree