Health RSS Feed


Hand Back Our Hospital

One hospital should lose stroke care, doctor says


A TOP doctor today said stroke care should be axed from Wycombe or Aylesbury hospitals to save lives.

Piers Clifford, a consultant cardiologist, said Wycombe Hospital and Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury were not seeing enough patients to keep up doctors’ and staff skills.

Government guidance said about 500 people should be seen a year – but each site was seeing 200 to 300 cases.

One hospital is therefore likely to lose the service – but bosses have not said which. They have pledged a full public consultation.

The hospital has already lost major A&E cases and doctor-led births. Yet Dr Clifford said it had kept a key heart attack service that was saving lives.

He told the annual meeting of Buckinghamshire’s hospital authority today there are four options for stroke care.

Having all care on one site ‘is probably the way that we in Buckinghamshire are going to go’ he said.

This would have ‘hyper-acute care’, treatment within 12 hours of a stroke, and acute care, treatment within six days, at one hospital, he said.

Keeping the service at both sites ‘probably isn’t the way forward’ he said. The size of the community, its level of deprivation and ethnicity would help decide the hospital, he said.

What do you think? Leave your comments below.

Other options are to have hyper-acute care at one site and acute care at both or hyper-acute at one and clot busting thrombolysis on one. The latter treatment is infrequently used.

Dr Clifford told The Bucks Free Press that the Royal College of Physicians – the professional body for consultants – said the hospitals were not seeing enough patients.

Buckinghamshire Hospitals NHS Trust chief executive Anne Eden said: “There will need to be a degree of centralisation.”

It comes after a life saving heart attack procedure was saved for Wycombe after South East NHS chiefs suggested it move to Oxford.

Dr Clifford said time was a vital factor for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, where a balloon is inserted into the body to clear blocked arteries. It is open in the day.

He said ‘there would be several people in those circumstances who would not get the appropriate treatment’ if it left Wycombe, he said.

Patients would have had to go to the John Radcliffe 2 Hospital in Oxford, he said. Survival was 2.7 per cent from one to two hours – but this rose to 11.4 per cent over three, he said.

The treatment cut deaths by 30 per cent compared to the previous treatment, thrombolysis, where a drug is injected into the patient to break apart blood clots.

Ron Newell, vice chairman of the Buckinghamshire Local Involvement Network, the official NHS watchdog, said: “We will be talking with the trust to see if patients do get the best care.

“They are committed to it – whether they achieve it, we will find out.”

Click the links below for related stories.


Comments(6)

tigeran says...
12:25pm Tue 27 Jul 10

"One hospital should lose stroke care"

Or how about keeping both with stroke care and cut back on bennefit cheats, low life breeding like rabbits but never working a day in their lives, generation after generation, so called 'assylum seekers' getting immediate housing and bennefits etc, etc to fund this instead? No, that would be FAR too contraversial to actually look after the people who actually pay there way in this life........

Mrs DaPoint says...
12:48pm Tue 27 Jul 10

Maybe Mr. Clifford studied at the Harold Shipman school of medicine.


And why on earth is 'saving', from 'saving lives' linked to thisismoneyback.com? What has that got to do with saving lives?

BigTommy says...
1:25pm Tue 27 Jul 10

Another sounding of the death knell of Wycombe hospital.
.
I said before that although the authority has come out and said that there are no plans for the closure of Wycombe hospital, the same people would be back saying "ah, but unfortuately things have changed."
~
Here is the first of those "unforeseen" changes.

miccles says...
4:29pm Tue 27 Jul 10

"Keeping the service at both sites ‘probably isn’t the way forward’ he said. The size of the community, its level of deprivation and ethnicity would help decide the hospital, he said."


What you are really saying is, it's going to be Wycombe Hospital.

mustn't criticise precious SM hospital must we.

MCarey says...
9:14pm Tue 27 Jul 10

what actually happens at wycombe hospital now as i have no idea what its for now

Joe Ordinary says...
2:12pm Wed 28 Jul 10

The rationale offered by Piers Clifford for focusing Stroke services reflects the view of the Government and the Royal Society of Physicians, i.e. it is not an arbitrary position being adopted by the Bucks Hospital Trust and it appears to be quite rational and to be based on experience.

BHT are committed to a Public Consultation before any action is taken to implement this proposal so Patients, Carers and the Public in Bucks will have an opportunity to put forward their reasoned, rational views (if the Public Consultation process is properly handled/managed).

Whilst the proposal may save money (when did that become a bad thing?) the declared objective is to ensure that the Stroke service being offered to the people of Bucks is the best and most appropriate service which can be offered by the Bucks Hospitals NHS Trust. Is this not what we all want and expect?

The sooner we all get to a point where we can accept the fact that every medical service can be available in every location (that's just not feasible for any number of good reasons) the sooner we can get on with involving ourselves in ensuring that the medical services with which we are provided in Bucks are the best which can be provided within the constraints of best practice and available finance.


The front hospital block is set to be demolished Wycombe Hospital

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses