Report this comment
  • "Where , where ?"
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Census 2011: Population in south Bucks up almost six percent

Census 2011: Population in south Bucks up almost six percent Census 2011: Population in south Bucks up almost six percent

SOUTH Buckinghamshire’s population increased by almost six percent during the last ten years, according to new census data released today.

The combined population of the Wycombe, Chiltern and South Bucks districts now stands at 331,200.

There are 171,700 people living in the Wycombe district, which is an increase of 9,595 people from a decade ago.

The Chilterns has gained 3,372 new residents in the last ten years, with the population count ticking over to 92,600 people.

And there are now 66,900 people living in the South Bucks district, which is a rise of 4,995 people since the last survey in 2001.

The overall population of England and Wales shot up by 3.7 million people to 56.1 million.

Buckinghamshire’s population is 505,300.

People were asked to complete a compulsory form asking a host of questions - including age, gender, education, health, job titles, ethnic background and national identity - in March last year.

The results of the census will be used to plan public services.

To view a breakdown of the Census 2011 results, click on the link.

Related links

Related links

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree