Report this comment
  • "Well the Council is still pursuing others as I had to stump up £25 for failing to display the correct part only the other week. I can hear the critics on this site saying well the rules are clear and can agree with this but if it really is a genuine mistake and is proved so then why is the penalty so high. And the 50% reduction in the penalty it would seem is only to encourage you NOT to complain for fear of being unsuccessful in any appeal.
    .
    If you return a book to the library late you are not fined the total cost of the book so parking penalties should reflect the seriousness of the "crime" in a similar way and people will be only too happy to pay up. The misdemeanour here is failing to display the correct portion of the ticket not failing to display any ticket whatsoever. The latter here is obviously a breach of the terms of parking and should be dealt with a £50 penalty. The former is a mistake and should be dealt with in a much more lenient way.
    .
    I fully support this gentleman's appeal against the council and wish him luck."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Sainsbury's parking saga: Council backs down over appeals

Stan Samek Stan Samek

TWO more motorists hit by £50 fines at the car park behind Sainsbury's in Marlow were victorious in their appeals.

Wycombe District Council has backed down on two cases set to go to the independent parking adjudicator.

It comes after the found in favour of businesswoman Sue Preece last week.

The council had said her victory did not set a precedent and appeals had to be considered on an individual basis.

Yet, officials have now scrapped their attempt to enforce the penalties for consumer champion Ian Nixey and Holmer Green resident Stan Samek.

Both had upcoming hearings set.

Machines installed when Sainsbury's opened printed two similar looking pieces of paper - firstly a store discount voucher, the second a parking ticket.

Problems arose for drivers when they mistakenly took the first part only and placed this on display.

Wycombe District Council changed the machines soon after complaints.

The Marlow Free Press appealed to the council to cancel the fines, believing them to be unjust.

Mr Nixey, 63, CEO of Windsor and Maidenhead Citizens Advice Bureau, was actually caught out in January after the machines changed, displaying the wrong part of the printed ticket.

The Henley Road resident said both parts looked nearly identical.

He admitted his mistake but said the fact was he had paid for the ticket and had proof.

He claimed the instructions were unclear and the fine was simply unfair.

He said: "I just feel sorry for the people who have already paid up and not appealed.

"I think common sense has prevailed but whether it's the council's common sense I'm not convinced.

"It shouldn't have happened in the first place, they should be much more customer responsive.

"They should recognise that there has been a problem and take some of the blame for it."

He called for the council to pay back everyone affected.

Mr Samek, whose son Antosh co-owns the Clayton's bar in Oxford Road, was one of 92 motorists who displayed the wrong piece of paper during December but was also told this week the council were no longer pursuing his £50.

He is donating £50 to charity instead.

The council has not commented since responding to the decision on Mrs Preece's successful appeal.

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree