Wycombe district RSS Feed


Transparency call over council merger

Seb Berry Seb Berry

AN INDEPENDENT has called for two district councils to be more transparent about the savings and costs involved in a senior management merger.

Last week Chiltern and South Bucks District Council announced the first step had been taken to bring together their management teams under a single chief executive, saying they would build up savings of at least £500,000 by the end of the first two years of the project.

But Chiltern District cllr Seb Berry said these figures are misleading.

He said: ""I fully support the reorganisation but it is actually misleading to suggest that the savings of £500,000 will be in two years, which implies that those savings are delivered over the next two years."

He said he does not think any one disputes the figures, which he said shows there will be a loss in the first two years and full savings will not be realised until year three.

By the end of this financial year, April 5, the expected savings are £17,270.

Then in the next tax year- 2012/13- savings of £168,200 are expected through changes to structure of the organisation and staff appointments.

In the 2013/14 tax year the project is actually expected to cost the councils £253,630 to implement staff changes, for example exit packages.

And then for 2014/15 savings of £514,420 are predicted which will then be expected every year.

Council spokesman, Rachel Prance, said by the end of the financial year 2013/14 the savings will have been captured (the first two years of the project) and so when the new financial year 2014/15 starts the savings of £514,000 will immediately be in place.

Although services will be brought together, the two councils will retain their independence as separate sovereign bodies.

Comments(4)

piran says...
11:53am Fri 3 Feb 12

Yes check the savings really have been made in 2 years time. If they have saved money then give a bonus to the staff who made it happen. But if not - sack those responsible. Most mergers and acquistions in business promise the moon but actually deliver no savings and demoralise/demotivat
e the organisation. Be careful what you wish for!

washondo says...
3:01pm Fri 3 Feb 12

Civil servants cannot justify "bonus" OF ANY KIND. In context, how can more be done than the job requires? Where is the standard, or what is the competition?
~
IT'S A JOB, you signed up to it .... wages/salaries - end!
~
Apparently, sadly - protected pensions, tax avoidance; being paid abroad!!! Why are former council employees allowed to be councillors?
~
Bonuses, for doing what the public requires of councils???? No more! "MORALITY"? Look it up.

piran says...
3:21pm Fri 3 Feb 12

Bonuses to encourage pepole to save money. Commercial companies use it, why not the public sector?

washondo says...
9:59am Sat 4 Feb 12

piran wrote:
Bonuses to encourage pepole to save money. Commercial companies use it, why not the public sector?
You said it. "Commercial companies" - as in competition.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree