Politics RSS Feed


This section is for news about councils and MPs. Click here to find your MP by postcode and here to find your council by postcode.


Beaconsfield MP Dominic Grieve backs G20 protest decision


ATTORNEY General Dominic Grieve has backed the decision not to prosecute a police officer following the death of a man at the G20 protest last year.

The Beaconsfield MP told the House of Commons yesterday the Crown Prosecution Service had concluded there was “no realistic prospect” manslaughter charges could be brought against the officer after the April 2009 death of Ian Tomlinson.

Video footage showed Mr Tomlinson being pushed to the ground by a police officer during a demonstration in London. He later died after collapsing.

Mr Grieve told the House on Monday: “No one who has seen the pictures of his treatment that day could fail to be disturbed by them. The facts were rightly and thoroughly investigated by the Independent Police Complaints Commission.

“In recognition of the strong public interest in understanding how that decision had been reached, last Thursday the Director of Public Prosecutions, who has responsibility independently of Government for the decision, made a detailed and lengthy statement explaining it.

“Once the IPCC has concluded its report, an inquest will follow into the death of Mr Tomlinson under the direction of Her Majesty's coroner. The Metropolitan police will also consider whether disciplinary or any other action should be brought.”

He added: “From the outset, the CPS and the IPCC approached this case on the basis that there may be evidence to justify a charge for manslaughter. Expert evidence was obtained with a view to establishing the cause of death.

“After the original pathologist, who was appointed by Her Majesty's coroner, provided a second statement about his findings, the factual basis on which the other experts had given their opinions about the cause of death was seriously undermined. The CPS concluded that there was no realistic prospect of conviction for manslaughter.”

Mr Grieve was responding to a request from Labour's Islington South and Finsbury MP Emily Thornberry to comment on the Crown Prosecution Service's announcement no charges would be brought.

In response to Mr Grieve's remarks, she suggested someone would have been charged if the roles were reversed and a member of the public had assaulted a police officer.

Ms Thornberry said: “We have all seen the film. The man was clearly assaulted. I suggest that that would not have happened if the tables had been turned and this shows that there is no equality before the law.”

Mr Grieve replied: “I have no reason to think that that is the case.”

He added another police officer was charged with common assault after hitting a woman twice with a baton during the G20 demonstration. He said: “That officer was of course recently acquitted by the courts.”

Comments(9)

wayneo says...
12:29pm Tue 27 Jul 10

"no realistic prospect” manslaughter charges could be brought against the officer"


Try assault then, thugs like this discredit the Police and should be off of the streets. I would also be very concerned as to why with the technology we have, that the post-mortems were inconclusive.

tigeran says...
12:30pm Tue 27 Jul 10

"ATTORNEY General Dominic Grieve has backed the decision not to prosecute a police officer following the death of a man at the G20 protest last year."

And rightly so!! It was an unfortunate accident in which an officer who was under massive pressure from the mob of so called protesters who only really were there to cause trouble, lashed out spontainiously. If these 'protesters' were not violent in the first place then this would not have happened. I blame them.

wayneo says...
1:09pm Tue 27 Jul 10

Have a look at the videos and show me where the protestors had committed any violence? resisting does not mean that one is being violent. I can't imagine you of all people think it's ok for Police to go around pushing people to the ground because they're 'rattled', if they get rattled, perphaps they should do a different job. This thug (the police officer), was from the territorial support unit, another group of thugs that cover their identity numbers so as not to be identified; that says much in itself.

best-beat

sai-diva says...
3:25pm Tue 27 Jul 10

tigeran wrote:
"ATTORNEY General Dominic Grieve has backed the decision not to prosecute a police officer following the death of a man at the G20 protest last year."

And rightly so!! It was an unfortunate accident in which an officer who was under massive pressure from the mob of so called protesters who only really were there to cause trouble, lashed out spontainiously. If these 'protesters' were not violent in the first place then this would not have happened. I blame them.
If he was under so much pressure his training should have prevented him from behaving like this. I believe the 'officer' had already had warnings in the past.
I have attended a few demos in my time, and a lot, not all, of the police like nothing more that to goad the demonstrators.
This guy wasn't even demonstrating, he just wanted to go home,
This was legalised murder in my opinion. We have the right to demonstrate without fear of being beaten or murdered.
A very sad day for this country,and so soon after Jean Paul de Menezes, one killing could be seen as an accident, but two?

wayneo says...
5:28pm Tue 27 Jul 10

sai-diva wrote:
tigeran wrote: "ATTORNEY General Dominic Grieve has backed the decision not to prosecute a police officer following the death of a man at the G20 protest last year." And rightly so!! It was an unfortunate accident in which an officer who was under massive pressure from the mob of so called protesters who only really were there to cause trouble, lashed out spontainiously. If these 'protesters' were not violent in the first place then this would not have happened. I blame them.
If he was under so much pressure his training should have prevented him from behaving like this. I believe the 'officer' had already had warnings in the past. I have attended a few demos in my time, and a lot, not all, of the police like nothing more that to goad the demonstrators. This guy wasn't even demonstrating, he just wanted to go home, This was legalised murder in my opinion. We have the right to demonstrate without fear of being beaten or murdered. A very sad day for this country,and so soon after Jean Paul de Menezes, one killing could be seen as an accident, but two?
Well said! couldn't agree more.

pennperson says...
9:50pm Tue 27 Jul 10

C'mon BFP do keep up with the news........see BBC news today....

27 July 2010 Last updated at 14:55 Share this pageFacebookTwitter ShareEmail Print G20 death Pc faces gross misconduct disciplinary action
Ian Tomlinson collapsed shortly after the incident during the G20 protests in 2009 The officer who struck Ian Tomlinson before his death at the G20 protests will face disciplinary proceedings for alleged gross misconduct

tigeran says...
11:47pm Tue 27 Jul 10

wayneo wrote:
sai-diva wrote:
tigeran wrote: "ATTORNEY General Dominic Grieve has backed the decision not to prosecute a police officer following the death of a man at the G20 protest last year." And rightly so!! It was an unfortunate accident in which an officer who was under massive pressure from the mob of so called protesters who only really were there to cause trouble, lashed out spontainiously. If these 'protesters' were not violent in the first place then this would not have happened. I blame them.
If he was under so much pressure his training should have prevented him from behaving like this. I believe the 'officer' had already had warnings in the past. I have attended a few demos in my time, and a lot, not all, of the police like nothing more that to goad the demonstrators. This guy wasn't even demonstrating, he just wanted to go home, This was legalised murder in my opinion. We have the right to demonstrate without fear of being beaten or murdered. A very sad day for this country,and so soon after Jean Paul de Menezes, one killing could be seen as an accident, but two?
Well said! couldn't agree more.
"A very sad day for this country,and so soon after Jean Paul de Menezes, one killing could be seen as an accident, but two?"

Tough luck in my opinion. The height of alert that this country was in and he ran when told to stop?!! No sympathy. probably had somthing to hide anyway. Idiots like you who put 'human rights' first over national security need looking at!
The fact of the matter is that it was a violent protest in the first place so i still blame the idiots who instigated it in the first place. You find it so easy to point the finger and blame yet have no solution to give. Pathetic.

Voyeur says...
12:57am Wed 28 Jul 10

Even GBH would be a reasonable charge to lay against the Police Officer.
.
The Met police seem to have a licence to kill with impunity.
.
Chap with table leg.
.
Jean Charles de Menezes - an innocent man killed by the Met Police in cold blooded murder. The senior staff promoted later.
.
I am afraid I would not trust a Met Police Officer at all now.

wayneo says...
8:11am Wed 28 Jul 10

tigeran wrote:
wayneo wrote:
sai-diva wrote:
tigeran wrote: "ATTORNEY General Dominic Grieve has backed the decision not to prosecute a police officer following the death of a man at the G20 protest last year." And rightly so!! It was an unfortunate accident in which an officer who was under massive pressure from the mob of so called protesters who only really were there to cause trouble, lashed out spontainiously. If these 'protesters' were not violent in the first place then this would not have happened. I blame them.
If he was under so much pressure his training should have prevented him from behaving like this. I believe the 'officer' had already had warnings in the past. I have attended a few demos in my time, and a lot, not all, of the police like nothing more that to goad the demonstrators. This guy wasn't even demonstrating, he just wanted to go home, This was legalised murder in my opinion. We have the right to demonstrate without fear of being beaten or murdered. A very sad day for this country,and so soon after Jean Paul de Menezes, one killing could be seen as an accident, but two?
Well said! couldn't agree more.
"A very sad day for this country,and so soon after Jean Paul de Menezes, one killing could be seen as an accident, but two?" Tough luck in my opinion. The height of alert that this country was in and he ran when told to stop?!! No sympathy. probably had somthing to hide anyway. Idiots like you who put 'human rights' first over national security need looking at! The fact of the matter is that it was a violent protest in the first place so i still blame the idiots who instigated it in the first place. You find it so easy to point the finger and blame yet have no solution to give. Pathetic.
National Security???? I'm truly surprised at you tigeran, Surely if National Security was threatened, they would have stopped Menezes before he got onto the train, as for shouting stop, if wasn't doing anything wrong so why would he have supposed that an order to stop would have been directed at him.

I wonder whether people who thought it ok for spooked and nervous coppers to pump 8 bullets into the head of a completely innocent man would feel the same were it a member of their family.


Tory Dominic Grieve criticises sentencing of child sex attackers Dominic Grieve

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses