Politics RSS Feed


Councillor threatens to smash video camera at chaotic Hughenden Parish Council meeting

Harrow Field, Warrendene Road Harrow Field, Warrendene Road

A PARISH councillor threatened to smash a man's video camera as he tried to film a chaotic meeting last night.

Nick Morris, a former member of Hughenden Parish Council, started recording the public speaking section of the meeting but was met with protests from councillors.

There was then a confrontation between Mr Morris and the parish clerk's husband, who was also in the public gallery.

Senior councillor Rick Gould then said: “Excuse me, if you don't turn that camera off I will come over and smash it.”

At the start of the full council meeting Peggy Ewart, the chairman, had said that filming or recording was “not appropriate” and warned she would stop proceedings if it was happening.

Someone pointed out the meeting had been closed before the public questions, when Mr Morris started filming, but Cllr Ewart said: “Mr Morris has been notified today that he may not use the camera.”

A video of last month's council meeting was posted on internet site You Tube.

Cllr Ewart then said she was closing the meeting due to “public disturbance” and there were more angry scenes as she and the clerk, Lynne Turner, asked the public and press to leave.

Eventually, David Carroll, a county councillor who was present, said he had persuaded members of the public not to film the meeting and a vote was taken over whether to continue.

Three councillors voted to end the meeting, with one saying she felt 'shaky and threatened', but most said they wanted to continue.

With public speaking continuing, parishioners Mr Swain and Hilda Stearn called for residents and councillors to “get together” and holds talks.

Mrs Stearn added she was disappointed by the behaviour of some of the residents, saying “nitpicking doesn't help anybody”.

The public gallery has been packed at council meetings since March, when a row erupted over rural affordable housing.

Many in Hughenden Valley were angry when the council proposed that ten houses could be built in Warrendene Road, which is in the Green Belt(see link below).

Later on in last night's meeting a recommendation was put to councillors to ban “visual or written recording” of meetings, unless given prior permission, as well as photography and video recording.

Many parishioners take notes of proceedings, with unofficial minutes being produced by one woman in the past.

But Lin Smith, a councillor for the Hughenden Valley ward, said she had looked at the model standing orders for parish councils and had not found any reference to written notes.

She said she was “very concerned about the legality” of the proposed ban, while councillor Tony Konieczny said the information provided with the recommendation had wrongly stated what the guidelines were.

The meeting agenda stated: “RECOMMENDATION:- to full Council to adopt a new standing order in line with the NALC [National Association of Local Councils]”, as follows:- ‘Photographing, visual or written recording, broadcasting or transmitting the proceedings of any Council meeting by any means is not permitted, without the Parish Council’s prior written consent.”

And Cllr Ewart said: “I'm very concerned about this written question because we have had issues with people taking verbatim notes and it's not been appropriate.”

Cllr Gould said he was concerned the verbatim notes could be misinterpreted.

District and county councillors present said they were “concerned” and “anxious” about stopping people taking shorthand notes at meetings and members agreed to seek legal guidance over “visual or written recording” part of the recommendation.

Comments(37)

BigTommy says...
2:50pm Wed 10 Nov 10

Oh my gawd, it all happens in Walford ... oops, I mean Hughenden. Can't wait for next weeks episode.

chesham20 says...
2:54pm Wed 10 Nov 10

councillors should know better, but it seems they don't. They are meant to be learned people..sorry i'm laughing....

J B Blackett says...
3:23pm Wed 10 Nov 10

This is the council , whose BCC member said he didn't want people from Wycombe coming to his Hughenden Valley.
.
Who on earth would want to associate with such a back-biting, malicious truculent pig-headed warring internecine nasty crowd (as reported) as these have been seen to be over past months.
.
Well the Folks of Wycombe say - No Thank You Very Much ; not even if paid to do so. Hughenden Councillors - Stay 'safe' in your own little war zone - but please Hughenden Councillors - stay out of Wycombe - we don't need or want your sort here. We have our own unpleasant disliked council members thanks.

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze says...
3:53pm Wed 10 Nov 10

Excellent report, by the way BFP.

Welwyn Dowd says...
4:27pm Wed 10 Nov 10

The quoted remarks in this article form a written record - the reporter is guilty of making a written record of the meeting. The ruling is ridiculous - it is saying that the public can come and watch and listen to meetings but not write down anything councillors say. The meeting is either public and on the record or it's not. Someone's got something to hide and be afraid about, that's for sure.

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze says...
4:40pm Wed 10 Nov 10

This may be a vexatious question, but would a symptom of having something to hide perhaps be a tendency to refuse requests for information rasied under Freedom of Information Act 2000, do you think?
-
Perhaps the passing of a resolution not to answer any questions about things that have gone on in the past?
-
Perhaps the holding of as much of the meeting as possible in the 'Confidential Items' section?
-
Perhaps refusing to answer on the spot questions requiring simple 'yes' or 'no' answers when raised in public speaking?
-
Those sort of symptoms? Would they suggest something to hide in your opinion WD?

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze says...
4:43pm Wed 10 Nov 10

J B Blackett wrote:
This is the council , whose BCC member said he didn't want people from Wycombe coming to his Hughenden Valley. . Who on earth would want to associate with such a back-biting, malicious truculent pig-headed warring internecine nasty crowd (as reported) as these have been seen to be over past months. . Well the Folks of Wycombe say - No Thank You Very Much ; not even if paid to do so. Hughenden Councillors - Stay 'safe' in your own little war zone - but please Hughenden Councillors - stay out of Wycombe - we don't need or want your sort here. We have our own unpleasant disliked council members thanks.
I think that even the person you have in mind may well have distanced himself from HPC over the past couple of weeks. Can't blame him for that.

deecee01 says...
6:01pm Wed 10 Nov 10

So no You Tube posts this time?

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze says...
6:18pm Wed 10 Nov 10

deecee01 wrote:
So no You Tube posts this time?
Dunno but I suspect you may be able to download the verbatim notes on Kindle
-
And see the re-enacment at the Wycombe Swan over Christmas, possibly with Peter Andre as the Dame

scorpio11 says...
6:20pm Wed 10 Nov 10

It's great to find out that fascism still prevails in parts of Buckinghamshire, especially on the eve of rememberance day

J B Blackett says...
6:29pm Wed 10 Nov 10

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze wrote:
J B Blackett wrote:
This is the council , whose BCC member said he didn't want people from Wycombe coming to his Hughenden Valley. . Who on earth would want to associate with such a back-biting, malicious truculent pig-headed warring internecine nasty crowd (as reported) as these have been seen to be over past months. . Well the Folks of Wycombe say - No Thank You Very Much ; not even if paid to do so. Hughenden Councillors - Stay 'safe' in your own little war zone - but please Hughenden Councillors - stay out of Wycombe - we don't need or want your sort here. We have our own unpleasant disliked council members thanks.
I think that even the person you have in mind may well have distanced himself from HPC over the past couple of weeks. Can't blame him for that.
You mean Baron P Frankenstein has disown his monster(s) and washed his hands of its multifarious misdeeds.
.
It all reads like the monster(s) are out of control and are becoming a threat to the whole Hughenden community.
.
That's what may have happened because something was created / stitched together out of spare parts or damaged organs discarded by others with no thought or regard to compatibility , tissue matching or the terrible chaotic consequences.
.
The Villagers must now tackle the monster before it does even more damage to local people and the environment.
.
It is now too late to follow the democratic process as the monster appears to be totally oblivious of / immune to / ignorant of that precious procedure.
.
Your Future is in Your Own Hands. Don't let it be stolen from you.

Save our green belt says...
6:58pm Wed 10 Nov 10

When will the parish councillors realise that they are there to represent their parishioners and by failing to do so they are in breach of their duty? No wonder everyone is so annoyed with their actions.
The whole of idea of building on green belt is a silly one and needs to stop now! Maybe then normality will return.

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze says...
7:19pm Wed 10 Nov 10

J B Blackett wrote:
Ewartwhatyoubulldoze wrote:
J B Blackett wrote:
This is the council , whose BCC member said he didn't want people from Wycombe coming to his Hughenden Valley. . Who on earth would want to associate with such a back-biting, malicious truculent pig-headed warring internecine nasty crowd (as reported) as these have been seen to be over past months. . Well the Folks of Wycombe say - No Thank You Very Much ; not even if paid to do so. Hughenden Councillors - Stay 'safe' in your own little war zone - but please Hughenden Councillors - stay out of Wycombe - we don't need or want your sort here. We have our own unpleasant disliked council members thanks.
I think that even the person you have in mind may well have distanced himself from HPC over the past couple of weeks. Can't blame him for that.
You mean Baron P Frankenstein has disown his monster(s) and washed his hands of its multifarious misdeeds.
.
It all reads like the monster(s) are out of control and are becoming a threat to the whole Hughenden community.
.
That's what may have happened because something was created / stitched together out of spare parts or damaged organs discarded by others with no thought or regard to compatibility , tissue matching or the terrible chaotic consequences.
.
The Villagers must now tackle the monster before it does even more damage to local people and the environment.
.
It is now too late to follow the democratic process as the monster appears to be totally oblivious of / immune to / ignorant of that precious procedure.
.
Your Future is in Your Own Hands. Don't let it be stolen from you.
More power Igor! Pass me the electrodes!

Hogmeister says...
7:20pm Wed 10 Nov 10

Save our green belt wrote:
When will the parish councillors realise that they are there to represent their parishioners and by failing to do so they are in breach of their duty? No wonder everyone is so annoyed with their actions.
The whole of idea of building on green belt is a silly one and needs to stop now! Maybe then normality will return.
Well said I could not agree more and once again I am disturbed to see the state this council is getting into.

Ralph B says...
9:07pm Wed 10 Nov 10

Absolutely outrageous that a councillor should threaten a member of the public. Evidence of how much he has lost sight of his role as an elected representative. I hope he does the honourable thing and resigns.

It is clear from the excellent report that HPC broke the law last night. Any decisions taken after going into a Part II without a vote are illegal.

This sad episode is following the usual pattern of councils that have lost touch with their electorate. They are attempting to use the law (but using statutes that don't apply or making their own up on the hoof). This draws more attention to their pathetic and desperate ploys and incites more public reaction. The sooner they learn the meaning of the word compromise the better for all concerned.

In the councils' trade body's 'Good Councillors' Guide' there is a clear theme that a Parish Council exists to do good for its community. This lot need to go back to basics and think about their purpose.

Very strange behaviour for a group of individuals facing re-election in six months.

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze says...
6:31am Thu 11 Nov 10

WDC has a Standards Committee that is supposed to do something about this sort of thing both at DC and PC level. Their role is doubly important now the hopeless Standards for England quango has gone. Does anyone know of a situation where they have actually investigated a complaint by a member of the public against a councillor?

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze says...
10:31am Thu 11 Nov 10

I love the smell of deleted comments in the morning. Even better the the small of 'Rotten Boroughs'

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze says...
10:33am Thu 11 Nov 10

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze wrote:
I love the smell of deleted comments in the morning. Even better the the small of 'Rotten Boroughs'
'Small'? Freudian. I meant 'stench'.

efbog says...
10:43am Thu 11 Nov 10

It's an absolute shambles, what happened to decent behavior and respect. Parish Councillors that have little or no abilty to deal with any form of challenge other than mundane matters. As for the thugish behaviour of one it just shows lack if intellect.

But what about the public behavior it seems that could go either way.

Surley there is some way to force the Parish Council to stand down and call an election?
That is, if any one is willing to stand and sort out this long term mess?

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze says...
10:53am Thu 11 Nov 10

efbog wrote:
It's an absolute shambles, what happened to decent behavior and respect. Parish Councillors that have little or no abilty to deal with any form of challenge other than mundane matters. As for the thugish behaviour of one it just shows lack if intellect. But what about the public behavior it seems that could go either way. Surley there is some way to force the Parish Council to stand down and call an election? That is, if any one is willing to stand and sort out this long term mess?
I know of one person who will definitely be standing for election (a proper election) in May, with the sole aim of handing back leadership of the Parish to its Parishioners

Voyeur says...
12:58pm Thu 11 Nov 10

Some councils routinely video their meetings and make them available on their council's website so that taxpayers can see how democracy works.
~
It goes some way to supporting responsibility and accountability.
~
Those councillors and officers who do not like to be recorded should re-examine the things they do and the things they say when they are supposedly representing their electors.
~
I find it amazing that Hughenden Valley councillors would object to anything they say or do at a council meeting being recorded.
~
In fact, it might actually improve the democratic process if it happened more often.

Mrs DaPoint says...
1:34pm Thu 11 Nov 10

If Rick Gould tried to smash my camera, by the time paramedics had extracted it, he would have some good footage of the inside of his large intestine.

J B Blackett says...
1:44pm Thu 11 Nov 10

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze wrote:
J B Blackett wrote:
Ewartwhatyoubulldoze wrote:
J B Blackett wrote:
This is the council , whose BCC member said he didn't want people from Wycombe coming to his Hughenden Valley. . Who on earth would want to associate with such a back-biting, malicious truculent pig-headed warring internecine nasty crowd (as reported) as these have been seen to be over past months. . Well the Folks of Wycombe say - No Thank You Very Much ; not even if paid to do so. Hughenden Councillors - Stay 'safe' in your own little war zone - but please Hughenden Councillors - stay out of Wycombe - we don't need or want your sort here. We have our own unpleasant disliked council members thanks.
I think that even the person you have in mind may well have distanced himself from HPC over the past couple of weeks. Can't blame him for that.
You mean Baron P Frankenstein has disown his monster(s) and washed his hands of its multifarious misdeeds.
.
It all reads like the monster(s) are out of control and are becoming a threat to the whole Hughenden community.
.
That's what may have happened because something was created / stitched together out of spare parts or damaged organs discarded by others with no thought or regard to compatibility , tissue matching or the terrible chaotic consequences.
.
The Villagers must now tackle the monster before it does even more damage to local people and the environment.
.
It is now too late to follow the democratic process as the monster appears to be totally oblivious of / immune to / ignorant of that precious procedure.
.
Your Future is in Your Own Hands. Don't let it be stolen from you.
More power Igor! Pass me the electrodes!
Did you mean 'elected toads' ?

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze says...
2:05pm Thu 11 Nov 10

J B Blackett wrote:
Ewartwhatyoubulldoze wrote:
J B Blackett wrote:
Ewartwhatyoubulldoze wrote:
J B Blackett wrote: This is the council , whose BCC member said he didn't want people from Wycombe coming to his Hughenden Valley. . Who on earth would want to associate with such a back-biting, malicious truculent pig-headed warring internecine nasty crowd (as reported) as these have been seen to be over past months. . Well the Folks of Wycombe say - No Thank You Very Much ; not even if paid to do so. Hughenden Councillors - Stay 'safe' in your own little war zone - but please Hughenden Councillors - stay out of Wycombe - we don't need or want your sort here. We have our own unpleasant disliked council members thanks.
I think that even the person you have in mind may well have distanced himself from HPC over the past couple of weeks. Can't blame him for that.
You mean Baron P Frankenstein has disown his monster(s) and washed his hands of its multifarious misdeeds. . It all reads like the monster(s) are out of control and are becoming a threat to the whole Hughenden community. . That's what may have happened because something was created / stitched together out of spare parts or damaged organs discarded by others with no thought or regard to compatibility , tissue matching or the terrible chaotic consequences. . The Villagers must now tackle the monster before it does even more damage to local people and the environment. . It is now too late to follow the democratic process as the monster appears to be totally oblivious of / immune to / ignorant of that precious procedure. . Your Future is in Your Own Hands. Don't let it be stolen from you.
More power Igor! Pass me the electrodes!
Did you mean 'elected toads' ?
If 'elected' includes 'elected unopposed' and 'co-opted' then possibly.
-
However, I would hate to give the impression that I have something against cold-blooded reptiles in general. Not even poisonous ones, in general.

silverthreadsamongthegould says...
7:37pm Thu 11 Nov 10

scorpio11 wrote:
It's great to find out that fascism still prevails in parts of Buckinghamshire, especially on the eve of rememberance day
I have great pride in my ancestors who fought and died for our freedom.

Nearly a hundred years on and we have the 'jackboot' regime again.

Like our 'Poppies' we will never surrender.

Peace, democracy, honesty and transparency will return to Hughenden Parish.

Michael, HP7 says...
7:48pm Thu 11 Nov 10

As reported - I was not there - this appears an obscenity and an outrage.

No verbatim reporting? Minutes to be prepared and filtered by a lackey?

Tumbrils should roll in Hughenden!

And in a few other comfy-council enclaves, in our leafy Buckinghamshire

The people have had this double-barreled overweening arrogance up to their chins.
Sack them all, their minions, their cronies, their minders, their in-laws, their business contacts, their inherent smugness.
Peel off those masks, and see the derelicts beneath.

Enough!
Out !

Michael, HP7
November 2010

Michael, HP7 says...
8:21pm Thu 11 Nov 10

J B Blackett, Ewart Bulldozer
Your multi-superimposing of previous replies on a thread is like donkeys playing ping-pong
Stick to the point of the article, and/or matters arising.

I do NOT wish to re-read your entire brayings, several times over.

Or, is this a little club of pub-bore forum familiars?

May I say that I respect both of your articulated views.

Just could the donkeys stop playing ping-pong?

Quote a salient sentence, from the original report, or from the ensuing thread.

Rather than regurgitate stuff several times over.

Donkeys playing ping-pong.

This is a forum, not an imbecilic play-area for point-scorers.
-------------
Michael, HP7
------------
s/w view-firm

Melanie1 says...
9:33pm Thu 11 Nov 10

Be very careful people if you even vaguely hint at a conspiracy theory then your comment will be deleted, as mine was, even though I have yet to have the reason explained to me!
.
If the BFP was a 'proper' paper they would investigate this thoroughly (as I suggested to them), but I won't hold my breath!

The Judge says...
9:57pm Thu 11 Nov 10

THERE WAS ALSO A FRACAS AT THE NELL QUINN TEA ROOMS LAST WEEK SOMEONE THREW SOME SCONES AND JAM - SHOCKING CARRY-ON.
JUDGE

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze says...
11:33pm Thu 11 Nov 10

Michael, HP7 wrote:
J B Blackett, Ewart Bulldozer
Your multi-superimposing of previous replies on a thread is like donkeys playing ping-pong
Stick to the point of the article, and/or matters arising.

I do NOT wish to re-read your entire brayings, several times over.

Or, is this a little club of pub-bore forum familiars?

May I say that I respect both of your articulated views.

Just could the donkeys stop playing ping-pong?

Quote a salient sentence, from the original report, or from the ensuing thread.

Rather than regurgitate stuff several times over.

Donkeys playing ping-pong.

This is a forum, not an imbecilic play-area for point-scorers.
-------------
Michael, HP7
------------
s/w view-firm
Michael HP7 1
Ewartwhatyoubulldoze eye
JBB ore

Michael, HP7 says...
1:33am Fri 12 Nov 10

f the BFP was a 'proper' paper ...

"Be very careful people if you even vaguely hint at a conspiracy theory then your comment will be deleted, as mine was, even though I have yet to have the reason explained to me!"
--------------------
---
Sounds like a nutter.
Perhaps she is a moderator on a local forum. So quiet lately.

Along with white-van Heathrow driver, no names mentioned.

Great fan of the military, he. Beware loose security and
Snoopy-dog's.
Amersham.org moderators.
--
Must com'b my dog's before hubby get's back, to our three bin's sprawling acre's.

I noticed there was a stale chip in the coffee shop recently.
---

This busybody would not last two seconds in a newspaper office.

Better off combing her dog's.

And fellow-moderating mutual navel fluff. Elsewhere.

Bye!

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze says...
6:35am Fri 12 Nov 10

Michael, HP7 wrote:
f the BFP was a 'proper' paper ...

"Be very careful people if you even vaguely hint at a conspiracy theory then your comment will be deleted, as mine was, even though I have yet to have the reason explained to me!"
--------------------

---
Sounds like a nutter.
Perhaps she is a moderator on a local forum. So quiet lately.

Along with white-van Heathrow driver, no names mentioned.

Great fan of the military, he. Beware loose security and
Snoopy-dog's.
Amersham.org moderators.
--
Must com'b my dog's before hubby get's back, to our three bin's sprawling acre's.

I noticed there was a stale chip in the coffee shop recently.
---

This busybody would not last two seconds in a newspaper office.

Better off combing her dog's.

And fellow-moderating mutual navel fluff. Elsewhere.

Bye!
Thanks for getting us back to the point there Mike

bintheredonethat says...
9:00am Fri 12 Nov 10

I think the Chairman is entitled to decide whether to permit recording and the F&A paragraph was just about what should go in standing orders. What was outrageous was that the Agenda item included the word 'written' as though it was in NALC Model standing orders. But nice to see that a well reasoned argument by a couple of Councillors won the day and got 'written' removed. Also interesting how the Chairman added a new item that wasn't on the Agenda - under 8., I believe - and then refused to allow another point to be raised by a Councillor because it was not on the Agenda.
Strange that in these days of the Big Society and greater transparency for public bodies, we seem to have a Parish Council firmly entrenched in Victorian times.

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze says...
10:52am Fri 12 Nov 10

bintheredonethat wrote:
I think the Chairman is entitled to decide whether to permit recording and the F&A paragraph was just about what should go in standing orders. What was outrageous was that the Agenda item included the word 'written' as though it was in NALC Model standing orders. But nice to see that a well reasoned argument by a couple of Councillors won the day and got 'written' removed. Also interesting how the Chairman added a new item that wasn't on the Agenda - under 8., I believe - and then refused to allow another point to be raised by a Councillor because it was not on the Agenda. Strange that in these days of the Big Society and greater transparency for public bodies, we seem to have a Parish Council firmly entrenched in Victorian times.
I feel a period fancy dress theme developing for the December HPC Monthly Pantomime - 'Dickensian Democracy'
-
I think we have clear candidates for the roles of Queen Victoria, Bill Sykes and Bull's Eye. But what about the ghosts of RAH processes past, present and future?

silverthreadsamongthegould says...
10:56am Fri 12 Nov 10

I totally agree about the accuracy of the minutes and would trust the person who takes them with my life.

Unfortunately it is highly unlikely that the police will take any action. Likewise our District and County Councillors with the exception of Councillor Carroll will turn a blind eye. A sad state of affairs considering they are being paid with our Council Tax. Too many committees and too many useless QUANGOs happily taking money when there are so many important things being cut from BCC's budget.

Trouble is they never listen

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze says...
11:12am Fri 12 Nov 10

ailverthreads wrote:-

"I totally agree about the accuracy of the minutes and would trust the person who takes them with my life"
-
Just so I understand, do you mean the official minutes of HPC meetings or the verbatim notes taken by 'one woman', according to the HPC article?
-
Not that I doubt you would trust either of them with your life, obviously....

DeposeHPC says...
11:19am Fri 12 Nov 10

When the going gets tough the tough disappear. Strange that Councillors Pushman and Gibbs always seem to have other committments when they should witness their junior Council's behaviour. Still, they and members of HPC are all mates...............
....

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree