Politics RSS Feed


Council accused of High Heavens/High Speed 2 hypocrisy

A design of the proposed waste transfer station A design of the proposed waste transfer station

COUNTY council chiefs have been accused of hypocrisy in their actions over expanding High Heavens rubbish tip and fighting High Speed 2.

Plans to make the Clay Lane site a station where rubbish can be bulked before being transported to a new incinerator in the north Bucks were approved by Conservative-controlled Buckinghamshire County Council last week.

But Former Great Marlow Parish Council Chairman Cllr Jan Pritchard, pictured below with other protesters, says they have been ignored – just as BCC claims to have been by the Government.

While BCC officials and senior councillors have hit out that the Coalition has not listened to residents in Bucks over the £33bn HS2 scheme, Cllr Pritchard claims it has behaved the same way towards householders in Great Marlow.

The ex-Parliamentary candidate for Labour said: “They are being very hypocritical on that basis, they can see their point but not anybody else’s. They don’t even want to know. We, as the parish council, and residents have been completely ignored.”

Concerns centre around the extra 21 heavy goods vehicles going in and out of the site per day – an additional 160 vehicle movements in total.

Senior Tory Cllr Bob Woollard also said residents’ concerns had been ignored.

Cllr Pritchard added that the parish council has been desperately trying to find funding for a much needed new play area, not far from High Heavens, but had been turned down at every attempt.

She said investment is needed for this, rather than expanding the rubbish tip.

BCC Spokesman Aidan Shutter said: “The Development Control Committee (DCC) is an independent committee of the county council and it took the decision to approve WRG’s planning application for a waste transfer station at High Heavens.

“As with all applications, committee members would have considered the merits of the application against local policies and carefully considered the view of local residents including those of the local member, Cllr Woollard, before coming to a decision. "As with any planning application, all the relevant details are publicly available and the decision itself is made in public by the DCC.

"It cannot be directly compared with HS2, which is following a very different process.”

Comments(6)

motco says...
12:20pm Wed 8 Feb 12

Building an incinerator is environmental vandalism too...

JOHNHEALY says...
1:13pm Wed 8 Feb 12

How are we transporting the waste to North Bucks I wonder? The answer is tons more lorries increasing the number of potential accidents, noise and polluting of the environment. We should instead make a railhead at Clay Lane as the North Bucks site at Calvert is kitted out for accepting rubbish by rail.

BOOKERite says...
3:08pm Wed 8 Feb 12

BCC says "it cannot be directly compared with HS2 because it is following a different process"
.
What a stupid statement. Never mind the process, it is the outcome of both projects that is important. They will both be destroying Green Belt, both be disrupting the lives of the local residents.
.
BCC have admitted and apologised in advance that it will worsen the situation on the roads. They know and we know that John Hall Way, the Turnpike Roundabout and Cressex Road cannot take much more traffic, especially not all the hugh HGV's and many more dustcarts. What will happen when Cressex Community School turns out in the afternoon? Anyone will tell you how the children run out into the road at the crossing without even looking. How long before someone is killed? What will happen then? I suspect the road through Marlow Bottom will be built (the one that had been planned for the proposed stadium). And that will mean even more destruction of Green Belt.

wayneo says...
4:48pm Wed 8 Feb 12

BCC Spokesman Aidan Shutter said: “The Development Control Committee (DCC) is an independent committee of the county council


Development Control Committee consists of:

David Polhill - Cons BCC
Dev Dhillon - Cons BCC
Bruce Allen - Cons BCC
Margaret Aston -Cons BCC
Mary Baldwin LibDem BCC
John Cartwright - Cons BCC
Trevor Egleton - Cons BCC
Alan Hill - Cons BCC
Niknam Hussain - LibDem BCC
Brian Roberts - Cons BCC

{Sarcasm on}Don't worry cos they're Independent! {Sarcasm off}

BOOKERite says...
6:43pm Wed 8 Feb 12

wayneo wrote:
BCC Spokesman Aidan Shutter said: “The Development Control Committee (DCC) is an independent committee of the county council


Development Control Committee consists of:

David Polhill - Cons BCC
Dev Dhillon - Cons BCC
Bruce Allen - Cons BCC
Margaret Aston -Cons BCC
Mary Baldwin LibDem BCC
John Cartwright - Cons BCC
Trevor Egleton - Cons BCC
Alan Hill - Cons BCC
Niknam Hussain - LibDem BCC
Brian Roberts - Cons BCC

{Sarcasm on}Don't worry cos they're Independent! {Sarcasm off}
Alan Hill is the BCC councillor for Booker, Cressex and Sands - I wonder if he voted for the WTS to go ahead?

washondo says...
5:51pm Thu 9 Feb 12

Still can't understand how BCC can give their sole contractor planning permission. I asked myself if it would be alright, then wrote it down so that it looked legal.
~
How does that work? Is the Development Control Committee independent or unaware of legislation or previous D of E decisions regarding this site in the Chilterns AONB and STLL Green Belt?
~
Or is the planning department still pulling the wool over their eyes to keep themselves in work?
~
This process can be carried out almost anywhere without additional building, excessive concentrated traffic, and 30 further years of pollution for Cressex and Booker.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree