News RSS Feed


Text banner 2

Miller's tale is so unfair on David Tennant

11:47pm Friday 13th June 2008

comment Comments (6)   Have your say »

By Colin Baker »

SIR Jonathan Miller has complained that West End theatres put celebrity ahead of quality. He bemoans the fact that producers won't back ventures that don't have star names.

This is in the wake of his recent production of Hamlet, which attracted critical praise but not West End producers.

There are however currently two other planned productions of Hamlet, starring respectively Jude Law and David Tennant.

Whilst I sympathise with the frustrations felt by the directors and the excellent but unknown casts of productions praised by critics when they don't get a commercial afterlife, nonetheless that is, (sadly one might argue), the way the theatrical cookie is currently crumbling.

However much we who work in it might wish it were otherwise, theatre has to fight its corner in a competitive world and more brave producers have lost money than have ever made millions from putting on plays.

Such is the power of television and film that the lure of a star will tempt more theatregoers to leave the comfort and security of their homes.

That star may be an actor, even a composer (e.g. Andrew Lloyd Webber) or indeed simply a high-profile musical, a genre that currently dominates the West End.

Where Jonathan Miller weakens his argument is in his dismissal of both the two star names he has chosen to illustrate his point - as being unworthy of that status - and also of the audience for wanting to see them.

He is reported to have decried the fact that the Royal Shakespeare Co. has cast "that man from Doctor Who" - which if true is rude and dismissive.

David Tennant worked with distinction at the Royal Shakespeare Co. long before he achieved his recent television notoriety - and is demonstrably a fine actor.

Jude Law, despite being impossibly handsome and a film star, has also earned his acting spurs in the theatre.

That Miller should so peremptorily dismiss actors who are successful already in favour of his Hamlet, Jamie Ballard, who thus far isn't (but may doubtless achieve that status one day if he is as good as Miller claims) surprises me.

I once spent an evening in his company and found him charming, brilliant and witty. I am disappointed by his apparent belief that fame and talent cannot go together. And I promise you it is not just Doctor Who solidarity that provokes my defence of David Tennant.


Your Say YourBucks

WaspPilot, Maryland says...
2:24pm Sat 14 Jun 08

Unless you are Stephen Sondheim, Disney Corp., or Mel Brooks, getting a play produced on Broadway here in the USA is increasingly difficult these days. Difficult, but not impossible. Take for example Jonathan Larson's RENT. Quite daring, it featured a cast of relative unknowns and went on to fetch awards as Best Musical and a Pulitzer Prize. Having said that, it did start off-broadway and was built up largely via word-of-mouth from Gen Xers. However, if there had been several other planned productions of the same show with major stars, the results would be different. I have to think that stars become so because they have a quality that is much loved by others, along with the requisite talent, luck and hard work. Mr. Baker is quite correct - let's respect them for it. The undisputed truths of showbusiness are hardly the fault of Jude Law or David Tennant. Let's wish them well in their productions, and buy a ticket to both! I'm sure Mr. Miller is very frustrated, and I wish him the best in the future. I do hope he was misquoted, and if not, can find it in his heart to apologize for misplacing his anger on the backs of the successful performers.

dolorescraeg, florida, usa says...
3:14pm Sat 14 Jun 08

mr. miller has a point in that unknown actors have more difficulty than established stars of getting plays produced...but here in america there are productions that are very successful with unknown performers. for example "august..osage county" which is guaranteed to win the tony this sunday for best drama has not one name star. where mr. miller erred was singling out two fine talents. i'm not too familiar with david tennant as i live in the usa....but i am a great admirer of jude law. the fact that he is a beautiful looking man does not take away from the fact that he is a fine character actor. his films for the most part are not the blockbuster type. mr. law has performed on stage, won the olivier award for cocteau's "les parents terible and been nominated for a tony for the broadway version "indiscretions" he's done "dr. faustus" and "'tis a pity she's a whore" and many more.... the fact that he is an international star is no reason to denigrate him.

M2, says...
8:06pm Sat 14 Jun 08

While I support any effort to provide more opportunities for un and lesser known actors.. I wish Hollywood would go that route more often rather than throwing the Tom Cruise's, etc.. at us every chance they get, I have to take exception to Mr. Miller's comments.

He does a disservice to not only the theatre, the actors and the public, but to Shakespeare as well. He wouldn't have appreciated his works being marginalized, and he would have made great sport of Mr. Miller for such remarks.

Onto Doctor Who, I became a fan of the series at the age of 12, when it first started airing in Massachusetts, as did my friends. Those former young fans, and they include even celebrities who grew up watching Doctor Who, still have great affection for the series, and have never forgotten it. Many of them enjoy watching the new series with their children. It says something about the quality of a program that has not only stood the test of time, but has come back so successfully.

It wasn't the fact that it was sci fi, or an adventure story either. It was the strength of the main character, and the qualities each of the actors that portrayed him, embued him with. What's more, I'm sure the Bard himself would have appreciated them for how they have spoken to the audience, as well as the adventure and entertainment value.

Lastly, young people who might be attracted to Shakespeare's works, and potentially become future theatre-goers by Tennant's role, is a good thing. When I was much younger, I was familiar with Shakespeare's works, but never gave them a chance, until I chanced upon a performance of The Taming of the Shrew, starring John Cleese. It was enough to open my eyes and I'll be forever grateful for it.

WaspPilot, Maryland says...
12:21am Sun 15 Jun 08

dolorescraeg, you are probably correct about "August: Osage County," but I have my fingers crossed for "The Seafarer." I LOVE that play! And for musical, my toes are crossed for "Cry Baby" - being the brain child of Maryland's own son, John Waters.
Cheers!

rynnkins, USA says...
2:34am Sun 15 Jun 08

I think that to lump all well known actors into the "star before talent" catagory is just as bad as hiring a name instead of someone who can act. Mr. Tennant is a fine actor, he has made me laugh, cry, replused, tremble with fear and he has made my heart break. Perhaps Miller should be aware of how talented the star is before he starts getting pissy. I think Tennant will be wonderful in anything he wants to do.

rods254, London says...
12:55am Tue 17 Jun 08

M2 and rynnkins, you have both squarely hit the nail on the head.

Having just signed up to Equity myself and trying to start out in this business I am almost tempted to agree with Miller, but I know that it is not that. Sometimes in film it occurs, however it is not a general case that should be thrown at every actor and every play. People become famous like Colin or David through their talent and what they bring to each part they played. When I saw Colin in 'Dick Whittington' I know they were not casting for fame purposes. It was because he is talented. I know I could not have played the part he did with the same degree of quality!

Miller is mistaken in his views. What he perhaps ought to critisise is the producers constantly choosing known talent rather than risking their name on a regular basis to find new people. As I am finding out however, no matter how difficult it is, the opportunities are there for new people, it just seems easier for the likes of David or Jude, but what everyone forgets is that they have worked to get there, and if they were truly empty and talentless they would surely not have continued thus far.

Your sayYourBucks

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Bucks Free Press account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Sponsored Links


Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »