News RSS Feed


Text banner 2

We have abysmally failed our young people

12:12pm Friday 11th July 2008

comment Comments (3)   Have your say »

By Colin Baker »

IT IS a perplexing time, observing our young moving from childhood into the world that we have fashioned for them. And I use those last words advisedly. It is the world that we have created that they now inherit.

And it could be argued that we haven't done as good a job as our parents did for us.

Admittedly, the Second World War focussed the minds of that generation upon what was worth standing up for.

We, by comparison, have given our children much more in terms of material possessions, experiences and opportunities, creating perhaps a greater visible divide than has existed before for those who see themselves as "have-nots".

Last week I saw stark examples of two extremes. I saw a group of youngsters gathered from many of our local schools performing in a marvellous production of On the Town' in Windsor.

All the young people involved should be rightly very proud of their effort and the result.

When the show ended, they celebrated together at a restaurant and one of their number was the victim of an unprovoked attack in the street afterwards by two complete strangers, for some reason they alone could fathom.

I went to pick up my daughter and had trouble finding her in the streets of Windsor because she had said "You'll see the blue flashing lights!" - and there were three separate incidents attended by police involving street violence in that small town on that one night.

On the one hand you have young people who seize the various opportunities they are given to get together constructively, which no-one can deny are infinitely more varied and abundant than in my childhood.

On the other hand there are those who perceive themselves as deprived and yet are able to buy drink in such quantities as to negate whatever tiny amount of self-discipline they have learned, from parents who either don't care or are frightened that social services will come down on them if they try to discipline their children.

Teachers then are often unreasonably expected to pick up the pieces of this breakdown of family responsibility without being given the parental authority to do so or any official support when they try.

The epidemic of knife crime is the extreme example of this abysmal failure of us all to provide these young people with the feeling of self worth that comes through tough love.


Your Say YourBucks

Pete, Australia says...
6:41pm Fri 11 Jul 08

"On the other hand there are those who perceive themselves as deprived and yet are able to buy drink in such quantities"

Hi Colin. Drink's cheap. One of the basic necessities (housing) is now so expensive as to be essentially unaffordable to any but those whose immediate families already own property and leave an inheritance. No amount of effort on their part is going to secure their future, so no surprise they don't see much point to playing by society's rules.

" abysmal failure of us all to provide these young people with the feeling of self worth that comes through tough love."

The neoconservatives have already given these generations plenty of stick. A bit of carrot's more than overdue.

David, Exeter says...
1:06pm Mon 14 Jul 08

To be fair Pete, I believe Colin was criticising the parents and the parent generation for the way in which the more antisocial elements can behave, rather than just blaming the youth.

IN many respects I agree. The problem is not that we somehow have a generation that is genetically predisposed to violence. They have come to believe they are entitled to something they may not have earned. This can be brought about by the authority figures in their lives giving the impression that because there are successful, wealthy or privileged people, then everyone should have the same benefits as those examples.

The truth is that some achieve success through preferential treatment due to status or influence. But most of us who have a home, a job, a family and, dare I say it, a life, have done so because we started off with little, and worked our way up to where we are.

If parents and society as a whole give young people the impression that they are somehow entitled to everything others have without having to earn it, then inevitably a sense of injustice builds. I suspect most conflict is down to a perceived sense of injustice, whether that injustice is real or not.

My sad prognosis is that things are only going to get worse. This is because in order to restore some sense of value to the important social aspects of life, we must increase the relative worth of the community around us. In order to do that, people must find themselves more reliant on their neighbours and family to achieve a happy life. IN a modern society which measures success by independence, either physical or financial, this is a difficult model to restore. Colin's reference to the wartime generation is a good example. People valued behavioural standards, because without them, everyone was worse off. Sharing and mutual support were the only way to make progress in an environment where most people had little. My sadness arises because I cannot honestly see voters choosing voluntarily to return to a time of having little, in order to restore some semblance of social cohesion.

We must try to restore the belief that boundaries are good. Saying that we must not restrict children's potential or impose our wil upon those for whom we have responsibility achieves nothing but a generation who don't know where the boundaries lie, and thus have no sense of responsibility to others. I recently saw a quote which said, "We have a bil of rights. Where's the bill of responsibilities?" You shouldn't have one without the other.

Milsy, USA says...
5:26pm Tue 15 Jul 08

What you are both missing here is the fact that many times these hoodlums are left to their own devices without a parent in the picture or with parents so wrapped up in themselves and making money that they cannot see what is really happening.
Also, their is an aspect of denial here. The idea that my "sweet,little one" would never do anything so horrible is a form of denial. When 15 or 20 people say "oh yes your sweet little one did do that" then it's time for parents to face the truth. During World War II, everyone was fighting for what was right and preserving family values if at all possible. Those basic family values are out the window (except at Baker Towers, of course.) and the hoodlums do not know the meaning of what punishment will come there way as a result of their actions.
In the USA, we have a celebrity named Hulk Hogan, of wrestling fame. His son was involved in a very bad car accident that was a result of drag racing another car. The accident has left his so-called best friend brain damaged. The son got a lousy 8 months in jail and in less than a week was whining about being there. Meantime, his friend is hospitalized with no real life anymore. Actions have consequences.

Your sayYourBucks

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Bucks Free Press account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Sponsored Links


Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »