"I'd be questioning Stevenage goal more if we'd lost"

Matt Ingram appeared to be fouled prior to Stevenage's goal

Matt Ingram appeared to be fouled prior to Stevenage's goal

First published in Sport Bucks Free Press: Photograph of the Author by , Reporter

BLUES boss Gareth Ainsworth admitted he would have been asking serious questions of the decision to allow Stevenage’s opening goal against his side had Wanderers not gone on to win.

Confusion reigned around the Lamex Stadium as it took several minutes for confirmation Darius Charles had given the hosts the lead despite a heavy challenge on Wanderers keeper Matt Ingram.

The Blues stopper needed an extended period of treatment after a booming tackle from Charles won a 50/50 challenge against Ingram, and with the former John Hampden Grammar School pupil collapsed in agony clutching his ankle the Boro striker reacted to poke the ball home.

At one point goalkeeping coach Barry Richardson – named among the Wanderers substitutes at the age of 45 – was preparing to come on, giving some credence to Blues’ claims the goal should have been disallowed for a foul on the stricken Ingram.

Ainsworth admitted he would have made more of it had the goal turned out to be the game’s pivotal moment.

He said: “I wasn’t sure myself. It seemed to be a nasty collision. Whether Matty got the ball first and he’s been crashed by forward, or whether the forward’s put in a legitimate challenge, I don’t know.

“I probably would have been questioning it more if that had been the only goal of the game, which is obvious. Winning 3-1 takes the edge off that, but it’s still something we should look at.”

Ainsworth added: “I thought the ref had a good game today. He didn’t crumble under a lot of pressure, which refs do here.”

Wanderers midfielder Stuart Lewis, a former Stevenage player, had a different view however: “Very controversial. Sometimes you get them, sometimes you don’t.

“It was a very, very strong tackle from their centre forward. I’d probably say it was a foul, but I’m biased towards Wycombe. We bounced back from that and won the game – that’s the main thing.”

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:38am Tue 26 Aug 14

kerlmann says...

I was at the game - it didn't seem like a foul at the time and having looked at the replay I'm not changing my mind. Ingram and Charles arrived at the ball at the same time - neither pulled out, BOTH got injured (which the reporter glosses over), but Charles got up and curled the ball into the empty net. I just don't see it as a controversial decision, especially as Ingram was out of his box and effectively playing as a defender.
I was at the game - it didn't seem like a foul at the time and having looked at the replay I'm not changing my mind. Ingram and Charles arrived at the ball at the same time - neither pulled out, BOTH got injured (which the reporter glosses over), but Charles got up and curled the ball into the empty net. I just don't see it as a controversial decision, especially as Ingram was out of his box and effectively playing as a defender. kerlmann
  • Score: 0
Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree